Eur J Pediatr Surg 2016; 26(02): 207-214
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1546755
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Contrast Enema for Hirschsprung Disease Investigation: Diagnostic Accuracy and Validity for Subsequent Diagnostic and Surgical Planning

Giovanni Frongia
1   Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Patrick Günther
1   Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Jens-Peter Schenk
2   Division of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Kai Strube
1   Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Markus Kessler
1   Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Arianeb Mehrabi
3   Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Philipp Romero
1   Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

30. Juli 2014

16. Dezember 2014

Publikationsdatum:
24. März 2015 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Introduction A targeted Hirschsprung disease (HD) diagnostic is necessary, as it determines a specific approach primarily based on surgical resection of the affected aganglionic colonic segment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a contrast enema (CE) for HD diagnosis and to determine whether it should be performed before or after rectal biopsies (RBs).

Methods A retrospective observational study of children undergoing RB for HD investigation was performed. In the performed CE, the occurrence and the level of a colonic caliber change (CCC) were recorded and its concordance with the histologically assessed level of aganglionosis by RB and the odds ratio were calculated.

Results A total of 107 cases were included. Sensitivity and specificity for a CCC in CE were 74.1% and 94.6%. A CCC present in CE was associated with a 50-fold increased probability for a histologically proven HD. The overall concordance between a CCC and the histologically assessed level of aganglionosis was high (kappa 0.642, p = 0.003), being correct in 94.4% of cases when the CCC was located in the rectosigmoid, but only in 50% of cases when it was located in more proximal segments. By performing a CE only after HD diagnosis confirmation by RB would avoid 67.5% of CE with no loss of diagnostic accuracy.

Conclusion We confirm that CE is a valuable tool for HD diagnosis; however, it should only be performed for subsequent diagnostic and surgical planning following histological confirmation of HD by RB. On the basis of this, an algorithm for an optimized investigation and management of HD is presented.