Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1588320
Proline-Mediated Baylis–Hillman Reaction of Methyl Vinyl Ketone without a Co-catalyst under Solvent-Free Conditions
Publication History
Received: 23 June 2016
Accepted after revision: 30 August 2016
Publication Date:
27 September 2016 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/synlett/201701/lookinside/thumbnails/st-2016-b0406-l_10-1055_s-0036-1588320-1.jpg)
Abstract
A proline-mediated Baylis–Hillman reaction of methyl vinyl ketone with aromatic aldehydes has been carried out without using any co-catalyst, under solvent-free conditions. The reaction works efficiently at 60 °C in the presence of a small amount of water to afford the Baylis–Hillman adducts in reasonable to very good yields over 8–48 h. The absence of a co-catalyst suggests that proline plays a role in the proton-transfer step of the reaction mechanism, in addition to its proposed involvement in the iminium ion formation and conjugate addition. This would, in principle, imply that proline acts as a trifunctional catalyst in the reaction, and mechanistic studies to gain a deeper understanding of this aspect should provide further insights in the future.
-
References and Notes
- 1a Baylis AB, Hillman ME. D. Ger. Offen. 1972; 2 155, 113; Chem. Abstr. 1972, 77, 34174q; Hillman M. E. D., Baylis, A B. US Patent 1973, 3,743,669
- 1b Morita K, Suzuki Z, Hirose H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1968; 41: 2815
- 2a Basavaiah D, Veeraraghavaiah G. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012; 41: 68
-
2b Basavaiah D, Reddy BS, Badsara SS. Chem. Rev. 2010; 110: 5447
- 2c Basavaiah D, Venkateswara Rao K, Jannapu Reddy R. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007; 36: 1581
- 2d Basavaiah D, Jaganmohan Rao A, Satyanarayana T. Chem. Rev. 2003; 103: 811
- 2e The Chemistry of the Morita–Baylis–Hillman Reaction . Shi M, Wang F, Zhao M.-X, Wei Y. RSC Publishing; London: 2011
- 3a Bharadwaj KC. RSC Adv. 2015; 5: 75923
- 3b Xie P, Huang Y. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015; 13: 8578
- 3c Bhowmik S, Batra S. Curr. Org. Chem. 2014; 18: 3078
- 3d Liu T.-Y, Xie M, Chen Y.-C. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012; 41: 4101
- 3e Rios R. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2012; 2: 267
- 3f Ma G.-N, Jiang J.-J, Shi M, Wei Y. Chem. Commun. 2009; 5496
- 4a Wei Y, Shi M. Chem. Rev. 2013; 113: 6659
- 4b Mansilla J, Saa JM. Molecules 2010; 15: 709
- 4c Masson G, Housseman C, Zhu J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007; 46: 4614
- 4d Shi M, Jiang J.-K. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2002; 13: 1941
- 5 Shi M, Jiang J.-K, Li C.-Q. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002; 43: 127
- 6 Guo P.-F, Wei Q.-Y, Jiang H, Xie P.-F. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2012; 38: 639
- 7 Gruttadauria M, Giacalone F, Lo Meo P, Marculescu AM, Riela S, Noto R. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008; 1589
- 8a Chen S.-H, Hong B.-C, Su C.-F, Sarshar S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005; 46: 8899
- 8b Duarte FJ. S, Cabrita EJ, Frenking G, Santos AG. Chem. Eur. J. 2009; 15: 1734
- 9a Imbriglio JE, Vasbinder MM, Miller SJ. Org. Lett. 2003; 5: 3741
- 9b Tang H, Zhao G, Zhou Z, Zhou Q, Tang C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006; 47: 5717
- 9c Tang H, Gao P, Zhao G, Zhou Z, He L, Tang C. Catal. Commun. 2007; 8: 1811
- 9d Tang H, Zhao G, Zhou Z, Gao P, He L, Tang C. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008; 126
- 10 Davies HJ, Ruda AM, Tomkinson NC. O. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007; 48: 1461
- 11 Luo S, Wang PG, Cheng J.-P. J. Org. Chem. 2004; 69: 555
- 12 Luo S, Mi X, Wang PG, Cheng J.-P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004; 45: 5171
- 13 Determined by HPLC analysis on a chiral stationary phase: Chiralcel OD-H column; hexane–i-PrOH, 95:5; 1 mL/min; 23.09 and 24.74 min.
- 14 Cai J, Zhou Z, Zhao G, Tang C. Org. Lett. 2002; 4: 4723
- 15a Roy D, Patel C, Sunoj RB. J. Org. Chem. 2009; 74: 6936
- 15b Roy D, Sunoj RB. Chem. Eur. J. 2008; 14: 10530
- 16 Although a similar reaction at 40 °C gave an identical yield, 60 °C was chosen for the reactions with other aldehydes to ensure better yields with less reactive substrates.
- 17 Proline-Catalysed Baylis–Hillman Reaction; Typical Procedure: Methyl vinyl ketone (2; 5.0 mmol) and H2O (25 μL) were added to l-proline (0.5 mmol) in a 5-mL vial and the solution was stirred for 15 min at room temperature. p-Nitrobenzaldehyde (1a; 1.0 mmol) was then added and the reaction mixture was stirred for 8 h and heated at 60 °C. Direct silica gel column chromatographic purification of the reaction mixture (EtOAc–petroleum ether, 1:4) afforded the pure product 3a (201 mg, 91%) as a light-brown solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 8.19 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.57 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2 H), 6.28 (s, 1 H), 6.04 (s, 1 H), 5.68 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.38 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1 H), 2.36 (s, 3 H).
- 18 3-[(4-Chloro-3-nitrophenyl)(hydroxy)methyl]but-3-en-2-one (3m): Yellow semisolid; IR (KBr): 3427, 1668, 1537 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 7.90 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1 H), 7.56 (dd, J = 8.4, 1.9 Hz, 1 H), 7.52 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1 H), 6.31 (s, 1 H), 6.12 (s, 1 H), 5.63 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.42 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1 H), 2.38 (s, 3 H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz): δ = 200.0, 148.6, 147.8, 142.4, 131.7, 131.2, 127.9, 125.9, 123.5, 71.5, 25.3; HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H] calcd. for C11H10ClNO4: 256.0298; found: 255.9916.
- 19a Price KE, Broadwater SJ, Jung HM, McQuade DT. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 147
- 19b Price KE, Broadwater SJ, Walker BJ, McQuade DT. J. Org. Chem. 2005; 70: 3980
- 20a Aggarwal VK, Fulford SY, Lloyd-Jones GC. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005; 44: 1706
- 20b Robiette R, Aggarwal VK, Harvey JN. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007; 129: 15513
- 21 Amarante GW, Milagre HM. S, Vaz BG, Ferreira BR. V, Eberlin MN, Coelho F. J. Org. Chem. 2009; 74: 3031
- 22 Xu JJ. J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 2006; 767: 61
- 23 Roy D, Sunoj RB. Org. Lett. 2007; 9: 4873
- 24 Utsumi N, Zhang H, Tanaka F, Barbas CF. III. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007; 46: 1878
For reviews and books, see:
A proline-catalysed enantioselective intramolecular Baylis–Hillman reaction in the absence of a co-catalyst has been reported and studied, see: