Synlett 2018; 29(12): 1622-1626
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1591588
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

A Practical Access to Functionalized Alkyl Sulfinates

C. Tran
a   PSL Research University, Chimie ParisTech, CNRS, Institut de Recherche de Chimie Paris, 11, rue Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, 75005, France   Email: mansour.haddad@chimie-paristech.fr   Email: phannarath.phansavath@chimie-paristech.fr   Email: virginie.vidal@chimie-paristech.fr
,
B. Flamme
a   PSL Research University, Chimie ParisTech, CNRS, Institut de Recherche de Chimie Paris, 11, rue Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, 75005, France   Email: mansour.haddad@chimie-paristech.fr   Email: phannarath.phansavath@chimie-paristech.fr   Email: virginie.vidal@chimie-paristech.fr
,
A. Chagnes
a   PSL Research University, Chimie ParisTech, CNRS, Institut de Recherche de Chimie Paris, 11, rue Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, 75005, France   Email: mansour.haddad@chimie-paristech.fr   Email: phannarath.phansavath@chimie-paristech.fr   Email: virginie.vidal@chimie-paristech.fr
b   Université de Lorraine, CNRS, GéoRessources, 54500, Nancy, France
,
M. Haddad*
a   PSL Research University, Chimie ParisTech, CNRS, Institut de Recherche de Chimie Paris, 11, rue Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, 75005, France   Email: mansour.haddad@chimie-paristech.fr   Email: phannarath.phansavath@chimie-paristech.fr   Email: virginie.vidal@chimie-paristech.fr
,
P. Phansavath*
a   PSL Research University, Chimie ParisTech, CNRS, Institut de Recherche de Chimie Paris, 11, rue Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, 75005, France   Email: mansour.haddad@chimie-paristech.fr   Email: phannarath.phansavath@chimie-paristech.fr   Email: virginie.vidal@chimie-paristech.fr
,
V. Ratovelomanana-Vidal*
a   PSL Research University, Chimie ParisTech, CNRS, Institut de Recherche de Chimie Paris, 11, rue Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, 75005, France   Email: mansour.haddad@chimie-paristech.fr   Email: phannarath.phansavath@chimie-paristech.fr   Email: virginie.vidal@chimie-paristech.fr
› Author Affiliations
This work was funded by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) within the framework of the project DEVEGA (2014-2019).
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 03 April 2018

Accepted after revision: 24 April 2018

Publication Date:
07 June 2018 (online)


Abstract

We describe herein a three-step synthesis of aliphatic sulfinates. This cost-effective method involves the use of 2-mercaptobenzothiazole under mild conditions and exhibits good yields (up to 78% over three steps). This approach provides an access to a wide range of functionalized sulfinates. A good tolerance with respect to diverse functional groups (alkene, alkyne, ether, acetal) was also noted.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes

  • 1 Aziz J. Messaoudi S. Alami M. Hamze A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014; 12: 9743
  • 2 Boufatah N. Gellis A. Maldonado J. Vanelle P. Tetrahedron 2004; 60: 9131
  • 3 Guan Z.-H. Zuo W. Zhao L.-B. Ren Z.-H. Liang Y.-M. Synthesis 2007; 1465
  • 4 Liu C.-R. Li M.-B. Cheng D.-J. Yang C.-F. Tian S.-K. Org. Lett. 2009; 11: 2543
  • 5 Xia D. Miao T. Li P. Wang L. Chem. Asian J. 2015; 10: 1919
  • 7 Taniguchi N. Tetrahedron 2014; 70: 1984
  • 8 Lu Q. Zhang J. Peng P. Zhang G. Huang Z. Yi H. Miller JT. Lei A. Chem. Sci. 2015; 6: 4851
  • 13 Xiao F. Chen S. Chen Y. Huang H. Deng G.-J. Chem. Commun. 2015; 51: 652
  • 15 Chan WY. Berthelette C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002; 43: 4537
  • 16 Shyam PK. Jang H.-Y. J. Org. Chem. 2017; 82: 1761
  • 17 Woolven H. González-Rodríguez C. Marco I. Thompson AL. Willis MC. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 4876
  • 18 Wu S. Zhang Y. Zhu M. Yan J. Synlett 2016; 27: 2699
  • 19 Davies AT. Curto JM. Bagley SW. Willis MC. Chem. Sci. 2017; 8: 1233
  • 20 Shavnya A. Coffey SB. Hesp KD. Ross SC. Tsai AS. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 5848
  • 22 Nair V. Augustine A. Suja TD. Synthesis 2002; 2259
  • 23 Pinnick HW. Reynolds MA. J. Org. Chem. 1979; 44: 160
  • 25 Liu N.-W. Liang S. Manolikakes G. Synthesis 2016; 48: 1939
  • 29 Baskin JM. Wang Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002; 43: 8479
  • 30 Prakash GK. S. Ni C. Wang F. Hu J. Olah GA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 123: 2607
  • 31 Nassoy A.-CM. A. Raubo P. Harrity JP. A. Chem. Commun. 2015; 51: 5914
  • 32 Day JJ. Yang Z. Chen W. Pacheco A. Xian M. ACS Chem. Biol. 2016; 11: 1647
  • 33 Brownbridge P. Jowett I. Synthesis 1988; 252
  • 34 Day JJ. Neill DL. Xu S. Xian M. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 3819
  • 35 Ueno Y. Kojima A. Okawara M. Chem. Lett. 1984; 2125
  • 37 It should be noted that BTS was prepared from 2,2′-dithiobis(benzothiazole).
  • 38 Alkylation Conditions General Procedure A (for 2b–d,f,g,i,j) To a suspension of NaH (720 mg, 30 mmol, 3.0 equiv) in DMF (35 mL), was added a solution of mercaptobenzothiazole (1.7 g, 10 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in DMF (5 mL). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30 min. Alkyl halide (11 mmol, 1.1 equiv) diluted in DMF (2 mL) was then introduced to the yellow solution. The reaction was stirred at 70 °C for 3 h, quenched with water, and extracted with Et2O. The organic layer was washed five times with brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The yellow residue was then purified by column chromatography on silica gel to afford the expected compound. General Procedure B (for 2a,e) To a solution of Na (rinsed with heptane, 345 mg, 15 mmol, 1.5 equiv) in dry MeOH (dried over CaH2, 30 mL) was slowly added mercaptobenzothiazole (1.7 g, 10 mmol, 1.0 equiv). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 10 min. The alkyl halide (11 mmol, 1.1 equiv) was then introduced to the yellow solution. The reaction was stirred at 60 °C for 3 h, quenched with water, and extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic layer was washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The yellow residue was then purified by column chromatography on silica gel to obtain the desired compound. General Procedure C (for 2h,k–n) Mercaptobenzothiazole (1.7 g, 10 mmol, 1.0 equiv) was dissolved in DMF (11 mL). Alkyl halide (15 mmol, 1.5 equiv) and K2CO3 (2.8 g, 20 mmol, 2.0 equiv) were added, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 h. The reaction was then quenched with water and extracted with Et2O. The organic layer was washed five times with brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The yellow residue was then purified by column chromatography on silica gel to afford the expected compound. Compound 2j was prepared according to procedure A starting from 1-(chloromethyl)-4-methoxybenzene (1.5 mL, 1.7 g, 11 mmol, 1.1 equiv). Purification on silica gel (cyclohexane to cyclohexane/ethyl acetate = 95:5) afforded 2j as a white solid (2.5 g, 87%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.95–7.88 (m, 1 H), 7.75 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1 H), 7.46–7.35 (m, 3 H), 7.34–7.27 (m, 1 H), 6.89–6.82 (m, 2 H), 4.57 (s, 2 H), 3.80 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 166.7, 159.3, 153.3, 135.4, 130.5, 128.1, 126.2, 124.4, 121.7, 121.1, 114.2, 55.4, 37.5. Rf = 0.48 (cyclohexane/EtOAc = 80:20); mp 64 °C. IR: 1610, 1513, 1454, 1424, 1251, 1172, 1026, 1007, 836, 755, 729, 699 cm-1.
  • 39 Oxidation Conditions 2-Alkylthiobenzothiazole (1.0 equiv) was dissolved in CH2Cl2, mCPBA 70% (3.0 equiv) was then introduced, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. The reaction was then quenched with a saturated solution of Na2S2O3 and extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic layer was washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was then purified by column chromatography on silica gel to obtain the corresponding sulfone. Sulfone 3j was prepared according to procedure D starting from 2-[(4-methoxybenzyl)thio]benzo[d]thiazole (1.5 g, 5.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in CH2Cl2 (26 mL) and mCPBA (2.7 g, 15.0 mmol, 3.0 equiv). Purification on silica gel (cyclohexane to cyclohexane/ethyl acetate = 95:5) afforded 3j as a white solid (1.7 g, quant.). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.25 (ddd, J = 8.3, 1.2, 0.7 Hz, 1 H), 7.94 (ddd, J = 8.1, 1.4, 0.7 Hz, 1 H), 7.64 (ddd, J = 8.4, 7.2, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.57 (ddd, J = 8.3, 7.2, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.20–7.14 (m, 2 H), 6.83–6.73 (m, 2 H), 4.70 (s, 2 H), 3.75 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 165.5, 160.4, 152.7, 137.2, 132.5, 128.1, 127.7, 125.5, 122.4, 118.1, 114.5, 60.5, 55.4. Rf = 0.18 (cyclohexane/EtOAc = 80:20); mp 124 °C. IR: 1513, 1406, 1313, 1250, 1145, 1065, 760 cm–1.
  • 40 Reduction Conditions To a solution of sulfone (1.0 equiv) in EtOH was added NaBH4(2.0 equiv). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h, then concentrated under reduced pressure, and triturated with Et2O. The supernatant was removed using a Pasteur pipette. The white solid was then dried under reduced pressure to afford the corresponding sulfinate. Sulfinate 4j was prepared according to procedure E starting from 2-[(4-methoxybenzyl)sulfonyl]benzo[d]thiazole (1 g, 3.1 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in EtOH (16 mL) and NaBH4 (237 mg, 6.3 mmol, 2.0 equiv), sulfinate 4j was obtained as a white solid (940 mg, quant.); mp >266 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 7.20 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2 H), 6.86 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2 H), 3.77 (s, 3 H), 3.46 (s, 2 H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 160.1, 132.0, 126.7, 114.7, 69.9, 55.6. IR: 1513, 1251, 1010, 982, 822, 676, 637 cm–1.