Download PDF
Semin Hear 2017; 38(01): 130-150
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1598069
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

A Sound Therapy-Based Intervention to Expand the Auditory Dynamic Range for Loudness among Persons with Sensorineural Hearing Losses: Case Evidence Showcasing Treatment Efficacy

Craig Formby
1   Department of Communicative Disorders, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama
,
LaGuinn P. Sherlock
2   Army Hearing Division, United States Army Public Health Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, Maryland
3   National Military Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
,
Monica L. Hawley
4   Department of Otolaryngology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
,
Susan L. Gold
5   Retired; previously affiliated with the University of Maryland Tinnitus and Hyperacusis Center, Baltimore, Maryland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
09 March 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Case evidence is presented that highlights the clinical relevance and significance of a novel sound therapy-based treatment. This intervention has been shown to be efficacious in a randomized controlled trial for promoting expansion of the dynamic range for loudness and increased sound tolerance among persons with sensorineural hearing losses. Prior to treatment, these individuals were unable to use aided sound effectively because of their limited dynamic ranges. These promising treatment effects are shown in this article to be functionally significant, giving rise to improved speech understanding and enhanced hearing aid benefit and satisfaction, and, in turn, to enhanced quality of life posttreatment. These posttreatment sound therapy effects also are shown to be sustained, in whole or part, with aided environmental sound and to be dependent on specialized counseling to maximize treatment benefit. Importantly, the treatment appears to be efficacious for hearing-impaired persons with primary hyperacusis (i.e., abnormally reduced loudness discomfort levels [LDLs]) and for persons with loudness recruitment (i.e., LDLs within the typical range), which suggests the intervention should generalize across most individuals with reduced dynamic ranges owing to sensorineural hearing loss. An exception presented in this article is for a person describing the perceptual experience of pronounced loudness adaptation, which apparently rendered the sound therapy inaudible and ineffectual for this individual. Ultimately, these case examples showcase the enormous potential of a surprisingly simple sound therapy intervention, which has utility for virtually all audiologists to master and empower the adaptive plasticity of the auditory system to achieve remarkable treatment benefits for large numbers of individuals with sensorineural hearing losses.

Keywords

Adaptive plasticity - sound therapy - dynamic range expansion - hearing aid benefit - hyperacusis - loudness recruitment - sensorineural hearing loss - sound tolerance.
 

  • References

  • 1 Formby C, Hawley ML, Sherlock LP , et al. A sound therapy-based intervention to expand the auditory dynamic range for loudness among persons with sensorineural hearing losses: a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Semin Hear 2015; 36 (2) 77-110
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Hazell JWP, Sheldrake JB. Hyperacusis and tinnitus. In: Aran JM, Dauman R, , eds. Tinnitus 91. Proceedings of the Fourth International Tinnitus Seminar. Amsterdam, Netherlands/New York, NY: Kugler Publications; 1992. : 245-248
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Goldstein B, Shulman A. Tinnitus—hyperacusis and the loudness discomfort level test—a preliminary report. Int Tinnitus J 1996; 2: 83-89
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Tyler RS, Pienkowski M, Roncancio ER , et al. A review of hyperacusis and future directions: part I. Definitions and manifestations. Am J Audiol 2014; 23 (4) 402-419
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Jastreboff PJ, Jastreboff MM. Tinnitus Retraining Therapy (TRT) as a method for treatment of tinnitus and hyperacusis patients. J Am Acad Audiol 2000; 11 (3) 162-177
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Schecklmann M, Landgrebe M, Langguth B ; TRI Database Study Group. Phenotypic characteristics of hyperacusis in tinnitus. PLoS One 2014; 9 (1) e86944
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Anari M, Axelsson A, Eliasson A, Magnusson L. Hypersensitivity to sound—questionnaire data, audiometry and classification. Scand Audiol 1999; 28 (4) 219-230
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Formby C, Gold SL, Keaser ML , et al. Secondary benefits from Tinnitus Retraining Therapy: clinically significant increases in loudness discomfort level and expansion of the auditory dynamic range. Semin Hear 2007; 28: 227-260
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Sheldrake J, Diehl PU, Schaette R. Audiometric characteristics of hyperacusis patients. Front Neurol 2015; 6: 105
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Baguley DM, Andersson G. Hyperacusis: Mechanisms, Diagnosis, and Therapies. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing Inc.; 2007
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 11 Fowler EP. The recruitment of loudness phenomenon. Laryngoscope 1950; 60 (7) 680-695
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Buus S, Florentine M. Growth of loudness in listeners with cochlear hearing losses: recruitment reconsidered. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2002; 3 (2) 120-139
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Baguley DM. Hyperacusis. J R Soc Med 2003; 96 (12) 582-585
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Sherlock LP, Formby C. Estimates of loudness, loudness discomfort, and the auditory dynamic range: normative estimates, comparison of procedures, and test-retest reliability. J Am Acad Audiol 2005; 16 (2) 85-100
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Davis H, Hudgins CV, Marquis RJ , et al. The selection of hearing aids. Laryngoscope 1946; 56: 135-163
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Silverman SR. Tolerance for pure tones and speech in normal and defective hearing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1947; 56 (3) 658-677
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Schmitz HD. Loudness discomfort level modification. J Speech Hear Res 1969; 12 (4) 807-817
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Gold SL, Formby C. Structured counseling for dynamic range expansion. Semin Hear 2017; 38 (1) 113-127
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Cox RM, Alexander GC, Taylor IM, Gray GA. The contour test of loudness perception. Ear Hear 1997; 18 (5) 388-400
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Tillman TW, Carhart R. An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. SAM-TR-66–55 [technical report]. SAM-TR. USAF School of Aerospace Medicine; ; 1966: 1-12
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Studebaker GA, Gray GA, Branch WE. Prediction and statistical evaluation of speech recognition test scores. J Am Acad Audiol 1999; 10 (7) 355-370
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Formby C, Korczak PA, Sherlock LP, Gold SL, Hawley M. Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses measured pre- and posttreatment for hyperacusic hearing-impaired persons successfully treated to improve sound tolerance and expand the dynamic range for loudness: case evidence. Semin Hear 2017; 38 (1) 69-91
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Hawley ML, Keaser ML, Formby C. Predicting hyperacusis in tinnitus patients. Semin Hear 2007; 28: 261-275
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Formby C, Gold SL. Modification of loudness discomfort levels: evidence for adaptive chronic gain and its clinical relevance. Semin Hear 2002; 23: 21-34
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Studebaker GAA. A “rationalized” arcsine transform. J Speech Hear Res 1985; 28 (3) 455-462
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Dillon H. Hearing Aids. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Thieme; 2012
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 27 Zeng FG, Grant G, Niparko J , et al. Speech dynamic range and its effect on cochlear implant performance. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 111 (1 Pt 1): 377-386
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Nilsson M, Soli SD, Sullivan JA. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95 (2) 1085-1099
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Cox RM, Alexander GC. Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life: the SADL scale. Ear Hear 1999; 20 (4) 306-320
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Gatehouse S. Glasgow hearing aid benefit profile: derivation and validation of a client-centered outcome measure for hearing aid services. J Am Acad Audiol 1999; 10: 80-103
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Chang JE, Zeng FG. Tinnitus suppression by electric stimulation of the auditory nerve. Front Syst Neurosci 2012; 6: 19
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Joris PX. Recruitment of neurons and loudness. Commentary on “Encoding intensity in ventral cochlear nucleus following acoustic trauma: implications for loudness recruitment” by Cai et al. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-008-0142-y. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2009; 10 (1) 1-4
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Auerbach BD, Rodrigues PV, Salvi RJ. Central gain control in tinnitus and hyperacusis. Front Neurol 2014; 5: 206
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Phillips DP. Stimulus intensity and loudness recruitment: neural correlates. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82 (1) 1-12
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Heinz MG, Issa JB, Young ED. Auditory-nerve rate responses are inconsistent with common hypotheses for the neural correlates of loudness recruitment. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2005; 6 (2) 91-105
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Heinz MG, Young ED. Response growth with sound level in auditory-nerve fibers after noise-induced hearing loss. J Neurophysiol 2004; 91 (2) 784-795
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Cai S, Ma WL, Young ED. Encoding intensity in ventral cochlear nucleus following acoustic trauma: implications for loudness recruitment. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2009; 10 (1) 5-22
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Diehl PU, Schaette R. Abnormal auditory gain in hyperacusis: investigation with a computational model. Front Neurol 2015; 6: 157
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Zeng FG. An active loudness model suggesting tinnitus as increased central noise and hyperacusis as increased nonlinear gain. Hear Res 2013; 295: 172-179
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Bartnik G, Hawley ML, Rogowski M , et al. Distortion product otoacoustic emission levels and input/output growth functions in normal-hearing individuals with tinnitus and/or hyperacusis. Semin Hear 2007; 28: 303-318
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Qiu C, Salvi R, Ding D, Burkard R. Inner hair cell loss leads to enhanced response amplitudes in auditory cortex of unanesthetized chinchillas: evidence for increased system gain. Hear Res 2000; 139 (1–2) 153-171
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Salvi RJ, Henderson D, Fiorino F , et al. Auditory System Plasticity and Regeneration. New York, NY: Thieme; 1996
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 43 Westcott M. Acoustic shock injury (ASI). Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 2006; (556) 54-58
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 McFerran DJ, Baguley DM. Acoustic shock. J Laryngol Otol 2007; 121 (4) 301-305
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Jastreboff PJ, Hazell JWP. Tinnitus Retraining Therapy: Implementing the Neurophysiological Model. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2004
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Jastreboff PJ, Jastreboff MM. Decreased sound tolerance. In: Snow JB, ed. Tinnitus: Theory and Management. Ontario, Canada: Hamilton Decker; 2004: 8-15
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 47 Hazell JWP. Tinnitus masking therapy. In: Hazell JWP, ed. Tinnitus. London, UK: Churchill Livingston; 1987: 96-117
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 48 Jastreboff PJ, Hazell JW. A neurophysiological approach to tinnitus: clinical implications. Br J Audiol 1993; 27 (1) 7-17
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Noreña AJ, Chery-Croze S. Enriched acoustic environment rescales auditory sensitivity. Neuroreport 2007; 18 (12) 1251-1255
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Brotherton H, Plack CJ, Maslin M, Schaette R, Munro KJ. Pump up the volume: could excessive neural gain explain tinnitus and hyperacusis?. Audiol Neurootol 2015; 20 (4) 273-282
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Pienkowski M, Tyler RS, Roncancio ER , et al. A review of hyperacusis and future directions: part II. Measurement, mechanisms, and treatment. Am J Audiol 2014; 23 (4) 420-436
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Schaette R. Tinnitus Related Hyperactivity through Homeostatic Plasticity in the Auditory Pathway. Humboldt-Universität Berlin; ; 2007
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 53 Turrigiano GG, Leslie KR, Desai NS, Rutherford LC, Nelson SB. Activity-dependent scaling of quantal amplitude in neocortical neurons. Nature 1998; 391 (6670) 892-896
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Robinson BL, McAlpine D. Gain control mechanisms in the auditory pathway. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2009; 19 (4) 402-407
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Knipper M, Van Dijk P, Nunes I, Rüttiger L, Zimmermann U. Advances in the neurobiology of hearing disorders: recent developments regarding the basis of tinnitus and hyperacusis. Prog Neurobiol 2013; 111: 17-33
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 Hawley ML, Sherlock LP, Formby C. Intra- and intersubject variability in audiometric measures and loudness judgments in older listeners with normal hearing. Semin Hear 2017; 38 (1) 3-26
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar