Electronically Divergent Triscyclometalated Iridium(III) 2-(1-naphthyl)pyridine Complexes and Their Application in Three-Component Methoxytrifluoromethylation of Styrene

^◊ These authors contributed equally.

Published as part of the Special Section 10th EuCheMS Organic Division Young Investigator Workshop

Abstract

A systematic study of the photophysical and electrochemical properties of triscyclometalated homoleptic iridium(III) complexes based on 2-(1-naphthyl)pyridine (npy) ligands is presented. A systematic investigation of ligand substitution patterns showed an influence on the lifetime of the excited state, with slight changes in the absorption and emission spectral features. Specifically, the emission lifetime of a complex of an npy ligand substituted with a strongly electron-withdrawing trifluoromethyl group was longer than that of the corresponding complex with the electronically nonperturbed ligand (3.7 μs versus 1.5 μs). Electronically complementary ligands and complexes with ­orthogonal configurations showed slightly shorter excited state lifetimes compared with unsubstituted npy (1.4–3.0 μs). All complexes displayed reversible or quasireversible redox-couple processes, with the complex of the trifluoromethylated ligand showing the highest ground-state oxidation potential E_1/2 ^ox [Ir(III)/Ir(IV) = 0.95 V vs. SCE in CH₂Cl₂]. This study showed that these complexes can be used as efficient photoredox catalysts, as demonstrated by their application in a regioselective methoxytrifluoromethylation in which the npy complexes showed equal or better performance compared with the archetypical photo­redox catalyst tris[2-phenylpyridinato]iridium(III).

Key words

photoredox catalysis - iridium catalysis - oxytrifluoromethylation - styrene - naphthylpyridines - ligands

• References and Notes

• 1 Current address: Key Laboratory of Mesoscopic Chemistry of MOE, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering and Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Vehicle Emissions Control, Nanjing University, Nanjing, P. R. of China.
• 2 Baldo MA, O’Brien DF, You Y, Shoustikov A, Sibley S, Thompson ME, Forrest SR. Nature 1998; 395: 151
• 3 Jung S, Kang Y, Kim H.-S, Kim Y.-H, Lee C.-L, Kim J.-J, Lee S.-K, Kwon S.-K. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2004; 3415
• 4 Ning Z, Zhang Q, Wu W, Tian H. J. Organomet. Chem. 2009; 694: 2705
• 5 Lo KK.-W, Zhang KY. RSC Adv. 2012; 2: 12069
• 6 Zhao Q, Yu M, Shi L, Liu S, Li C, Shi M, Zhou Z, Huang C, Li F. Organometallics 2010; 29: 1085
• 7 Yu M, Zhao Q, Shi L, Li F, Zhou Z, Yang H, Yi T, Huang C. Chem. Commun. 2008; 2115
• 8 You Y, Han Y, Lee Y.-M, Park SY, Nam W, Lippard SJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 11488
• 9 Singh A, Teegardin K, Kelly M, Prasad KS, Krishnan S, Weaver JD. J. Organomet. Chem. 2015; 776: 51
• 10 Flamigni L, Barbieri A, Sabatini C, Ventura B, Barigelletti F. In Photochemistry and Photophysics of Coordination Compounds II . Balzani V, Campagna S. Springer; Berlin: 2007: 143
• 11 Narayanam JM. R, Stephenson CR. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011; 40: 102
• 12 Lang X, Chen X, Zhao J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014; 43: 473
• 13 Telitel S, Dumur F, Telitel S, Soppera O, Lepeltier M, Guillaneuf Y, Poly J, Morlet-Savary F, Fioux P, Fouassier J.-P, Gigmes D, Lalevée J. Polym. Chem. 2015; 6: 613
• 14 Bossi A, Rausch AF, Leitl MJ, Czerwieniec R, Whited MT, Djurovich PI, Yersin H, Thompson ME. Inorg. Chem. 2013; 52: 12403
• 15 Lowry MS, Bernhard S. Chem. Eur. J. 2006; 12: 7970
• 16 Denisov SA, Cudré Y, Verwilst P, Jonusauskas G, Marín-Suárez M, Fernández-Sánchez JF, Baranoff E, McClenaghan ND. Inorg. Chem. 2014; 53: 2677
• 17 Bae HJ, Kim H, Lee KM, Kim T, Eo M, Lee YS, Do Y, Lee MH. Dalton Trans. 2013; 42: 8549
• 18 Constable EC, Ertl CD, Housecroft CE, Zampese JA. Dalton Trans. 2014; 43: 5343
• 19 Takizawa S.-y, Shimada K, Sato Y, Murata S. Inorg. Chem. 2014; 53: 2983
• 20 Kondrashov M, Raman S, Wendt OF. Chem. Commun. 2015; 51: 911
• 21 Shaw MH, Twilton J, MacMillan DW. C. J. Org. Chem. 2016; 81: 6898
• 22 Koike T, Akita M. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2014; 1: 562
• 23 2-(1-Naphthyl)pyridine (L1); Typical Procedure A Straus flask equipped with a stirrer bar was charged with 2-bromopyridine (1.0 equiv.), 1-naphthylboronic acid (1.1 equiv), Pd(PPh₃)₄ (4 mol%), 2 M aq Na₂CO₃ (2.5 mL/mmol), toluene (3.8 mL/mmol), and ethanol (1.3 mL/mmol). The mixture was degassed by three freeze–pump–thaw cycles and then refluxed under inert conditions overnight. The mixture was cooled to r.t. and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 20 mL). The organic phases were combined, dried (MgSO₄), and concentrated. The pure ligand was obtained by flash column chromatography [silica gel, EtOAc–hexane (1:4)]. Compound was isolated as viscous liquid that solidified upon standing. Yield: 1.6 g (99%). ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 8.81 (ddd, J = 4.9, 1.9, 1.0 Hz, 1 H), 8.11 (dd, J = 8.5, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.93 (dt, J = 7.2, 1.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.82 (td, J = 7.7, 1.8 Hz, 1 H), 7.63–7.54 (m, 3 H), 7.54–7.46 (m, 2 H), 7.33 (ddd, J = 7.6, 4.9, 1.2 Hz, 1 H). ¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 159.27, 149.56, 138.51, 136.44, 133.96, 131.18, 128.93, 128.39, 127.51, 126.52, 125.90, 125.62, 125.33, 125.09, 122.06. HRMS (ESI+): m/z: [M + H]⁺ calcd for C₁₅H₁₂N: 206.0970; found: 206.095.
• 24 Iridium(III) Complexes C1–6; General Procedure A Straus flask was charged with the ligand L1–6 (12.0 equiv), Na₂CO₃ (6.0 equiv), IrCl₃ (1.0 equiv), and deionized H₂O (60 mL). The mixture was degassed by three freeze–pump–thaw cycles, and the sealed Straus flask was heated at 205 °C for 48 h. The mixture was then cooled and extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3 × 20 mL). The extracts were dried (MgSO₄), filtered through a pad of Celite, and concentrated. The product was isolated by flash chromatography [silica gel, EtOAc–hexane (1:3) (for ligand), then CH₂Cl₂ (for complexes)].
• 25 CCDC 1875304 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for compound C1. The data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/getstructures.
• 26 Jiang X, Peng J, Wang J, Guo X, Zhao D, Ma Y. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016; 8: 3591
• 27 Coppo P, Plummer EA, De Cola L. Chem. Commun. 2004; 1774
• 28 Arias-Rotondo DM, McCusker JK. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016; 45: 5803
• 29 Millett AJ, Habtemariam A, Romero-Canelón I, Clarkson GJ, Sadler PJ. Organometallics 2015; 34: 2683
• 30 Okada S, Okinaka K, Iwawaki H, Furugori M, Hashimoto M, Mukaide T, Kamatani J, Igawa S, Tsuboyama A, Takiguchi T, Ueno K. Dalton Trans. 2005; 1583
• 31 Hofbeck T, Yersin H. Inorg. Chem. 2010; 49: 9290
• 32 Tucker JW, Stephenson CR. J. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 77: 1617
• 33 Juris A, Balzani V, Belser P, von Zelewsky A. Helv. Chim. Acta 1981; 64: 2175
• 34 Yasu Y, Koike T, Akita M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012; 51: 9567
• 35 Kou J, Lu C, Wang J, Chen Y, Xu Z, Varma RS. Chem. Rev. 2017; 117: 1445
• 36 Prier CK, Rankic DA, MacMillan DW. C. Chem. Rev. 2013; 113: 5322
• 37 Oxytrifluoromethylation of Styrene; General Procedure The oxytrifluoromethylation was performed according to the reported procedure; see ref. 33. An oven-dried microwave vial was cooled to r.t. under high vacuum then charged with 5-(trifluoromethyl)dibenzo[b,d]thiophenium tetrafluoroborate (42.0 mg, 1.1 equiv), the appropriate catalyst (0.5 mol%), and styrene (10.4 mg, 0.1 mmol), which had been filtered through a pad of basic Al₂O₃ before addition. The microwave vial was sealed and carefully degassed in by three vacuum–nitrogen cycles. A mixture of MeOH (0.2 mL) and CH₂Cl₂ (1.8 mL), previously degassed by three freeze–pump–thaw cycles, was added. The resulting mixture was irradiated with a blue LED light strip (7 W) at a distance of 2 cm with stirring for 4 h. The vial was then opened, and the internal standard trimethoxybenzene was added. The reaction mixture with the internal standard was briefly stirred and then transferred to an NMR tube equipped with a sealed D₂O capillary, which was used for locking and shimming of the spectrometer. The yield was determined by using 128 scans with a relaxation time of 60 s. The reported yield is based on the integration of the most upfield signals (δ = 2.27 and 2.43 ppm) of the product. The experiments were performed twice, and the conversions and yields are reported as average values.
• 38 Griffin JD, Zeller MA, Nicewicz DA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015; 137: 11340
• 39 Devery JJ. III, Douglas JJ, Nguyen JD, Cole KP, Flowers RA. II, Stephenson CR. J. Chem. Sci. 2015; 6: 537