PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Academic Ophthalmology 2018; 10(01): e12-e15
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1626731
Research Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Neuro-ophthalmology Training in Ophthalmology Residency Programs in the United States

Laura L. Wayman
1   Department of Ophthalmology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
,
John J. Chen
2   Department of Neurology and Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
,
Jacqueline A. Leavitt
3   Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
› Institutsangaben Funding This work was supported in part by an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, New York.
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

27. März 2017

19. Dezember 2017

Publikationsdatum:
05. Februar 2018 (online)

   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background The status of neuro-ophthalmology education in ophthalmology residency training in the United States is unknown. There are numerous articles in the literature detailing resident outcomes for surgical procedures; however, there are no articles detailing teaching of a nonprocedural specialty. There are no specific Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requirements for neuro-ophthalmology training within ophthalmology residency. Each program determines the amount of neuro-ophthalmology training and level of training within ophthalmology residency. There are no publications that detail the extent of neuro-ophthalmology training during ophthalmology residency.

Objective To determine the status of neuro-ophthalmology education in ophthalmology residency training programs in the United States.

Methods A survey was sent in 2014 to residency directors and neuro-ophthalmologists of all ophthalmology residency programs who participated in the Ophthalmology Residency Matching Program in the United States to determine the amount of neuro-ophthalmology training that residents receive.

Results From a total of 113 ophthalmology residency programs in the United States utilizing the Ophthalmology Residency Matching Program, 104 surveys were returned (92% response rate). Duration of neuro-ophthalmology training ranged from 1 to 112 days, with an average of 34.5 days. Most rotations occurred within postgraduate year 2 or 3.

Conclusion This is the first evaluation of the amount of neuro-ophthalmology training within ophthalmology residencies participating in the matching program in the United States, which demonstrates large variability among the different programs. Future studies could ascertain if there is a correlation between resident satisfaction in neuro-ophthalmology training and the amount of training.

Keywords

neuro-ophthalmology - residency - education

Presentations

This article was presented at the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society Meeting in 2016.


 

  • References

  • 1 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education - Common Program Requirements. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/CPRs_07012016.pdf . Accessed December 15, 2017
    PubMed
  • 2 Zhou AW, Noble J, Lam WC. Canadian ophthalmology residency training: an evaluation of resident satisfaction and comparison with international standards. Can J Ophthalmol 2009; 44 (05) 540-547
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Millán T, de Carvalho KM. Satisfaction with ophthalmology residency training from the perspective of recent graduates: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ 2013; 13: 75
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 McDonnell PJ, Kirwan TJ, Brinton GS. , et al. Perceptions of recent ophthalmology residency graduates regarding preparation for practice. Ophthalmology 2007; 114 (02) 387-391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Yeu E, Reeves SW, Wang L, Randleman JB. ; ASCRS Young Physicians and Residents Clinical Committee. Resident surgical experience with lens and corneal refractive surgery: survey of the ASCRS Young Physicians and Residents Membership. J Cataract Refract Surg 2013; 39 (02) 279-284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Golden RP, Krishna R, DeBry PW. Resident glaucoma surgical training in United States residency programs. J Glaucoma 2005; 14 (03) 219-223
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Shah VA, Reddy AK, Bonham AJ, Sabates NR, Lee AG. Resident surgical practice patterns for vitreoretinal surgery in ophthalmic training programs in the United States. Ophthalmology 2009; 116 (04) 783-789
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rowden A, Krishna R. Resident cataract surgical training in United States residency programs. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28 (12) 2202-2205
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kwon RO, Shah VA, Krishna R, Hausheer J. Resident laser in situ keratomileusis surgical training in United States residency programs. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35 (09) 1629-1632
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Wong RK, Ventura CV, Espiritu MJ. , et al. Training fellows for retinopathy of prematurity care: a Web-based survey. J AAPOS 2012; 16 (02) 177-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Binenbaum G, Volpe NJ. Ophthalmology resident surgical competency: a national survey. Ophthalmology 2006; 113 (07) 1237-1244
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Oetting TA. Surgical competency in residents. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2009; 20 (01) 56-60
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Le K, Bursztyn L, Rootman D, Harissi-Dagher M. National survey of Canadian ophthalmology residency education. Can J Ophthalmol 2016; 51 (03) 219-225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Shah M, Knoch D, Waxman E. The state of ophthalmology medical student education in the United States and Canada, 2012 through 2013. Ophthalmology 2014; 121 (06) 1160-1163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Chan TY, Rai AS, Lee E, Glicksman JT, Hutnik CM. Needs assessment of ophthalmology education for primary care physicians in training: comparison with the International Council of Ophthalmology recommendations. Clin Ophthalmol 2011; 5: 311-319
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Cruz OA, Pole CJ, Thomas SM. Burnout in chairs of academic departments of ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2007; 114 (12) 2350-2355
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar