RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632633
Evaluation of Stiffness and Stress of External Fixators with Curved Acrylic Connecting Bars
Publikationsverlauf
Received
20. Dezember 1998
Accepted
16. August 1999
Publikationsdatum:
09. Februar 2018 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00035023/200002/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0038-1632633-1.jpg)
Summary
The use of acrylic connecting bars in external fixators has become widespread in veterinary orthopaedics. One of the main advantages of an acrylic connecting bar is the ability to contour it into a curved shape. This allows the surgeon to place the transcortical pins according to safety and convenience considerations, without being bound by the requirement of the standard stainless steel connecting bar, that all transcortical pins be in the same plane.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stiffness of unilateral and bilateral medium-sized external fixator frames with different curvatures of acrylic connecting bars. Finite element analysis was used to model the various frames and obtain their stiffness under four types of load: Axial compression, four-point medio-lateral bending, fourpoint antero-posterior bending and torsion. The analysis also provided the maximal pin stresses occurring in each frame for each loading condition.
Based on the results of this study, curvatures of acrylic connecting bars of up to a maximal angular difference between pins of 25° will result in very similar stiffness and maximal pin stresses to those of the equivalent, uniplanar stainless steel system. In both unilateral and bilateral systems the stiffness decreases slightly as angulation increases for axial compression and medio-lateral bending, increases slightly for torsion and increases substantially for antero-posterior bending.
External fixator systems with curved acrylic connecting bars are commonly used in veterinary orthopaedics. This paper evaluates the biomechanical performance of such systems by applying the finite element analysis method. It shows that external fixators with curved acrylic connecting bars exhibit stiffness and maximal pin stresses which are similar to those of the standard stainless steel system.
-
REFFERENCES
- 1 Anderson MA, Mann FA, Wagner-Mann C. et al. A comparison of non threaded, enhanced threaded, and Ellis fixation pins used in type I external skeletal fixators in dogs. Vet Surg 1993; 22: 482-9.
- 2 Bathe KJ. Finite Element Procedures. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1-330 1996
- 3 Brekelmans WAM, Poort HW, Slooff TJ. A new method to analyze the mechanical behavior of skeletal part. Acta Orthop Scand 1972; 43: 301-7.
- 4 Chao EYS, Kasman RA, An KN. Rigidity and stress analyses of external fracture fixation devices-a theoretical approach. J Biomech 1982; 15: 971-83.
- 5 Chao EYS, An KN. Biomechanical analysis of external fixation devices for the treatment of open bone fractures. in Gallagher RH, Simon BR, Johnson PC, Gross JF. (eds): Finite Elements in Biomechanics. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 1982: 195-222.
- 6 Clary EM, Roe SC. In vitro biomechanical and histological assessment of pilot hole diameter for positive-profile external skeletal fixation pins in canine tibiae. Vet Surg 1996; 25: 453-62.
- 7 Cross AR, Aron DN, Budsberg SC, Foutz TL, Pearman BT, Evans MD. Validation of a finite element model of the Kirschner- Ehmer external skeletal fixation system. Am J Vet Res 1999; 60: 615-20.
- 8 Davis M, Schulz KS, Fawcett A. et al. Flexural and torsional analysis of five acrylics for use i n external skeletal fixation. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1998; 11: 53-8.
- 9 Drijber FLIP, Finlay JB, Dempsey AJ. Evaluation of linear finite element analysis models ‘ assumptions for external fixation device. J Biomech 1992; 25: 849-55.
- 10 Duda NG, Kirchner H, Wilke HJ, Claes L. A method to determine the 3-D stiffness of fracture fixation devices and its application to predict inter-fragmentary movement. J Biomech 1998; 31: 247-52.
- 11 Egan JM, Phil D, Shearer JR. Behavior of an external fixation frame incorporating an angular separation of the fixator pins. A finite element approach. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1986; 223: 265-74.
- 12 Egger EL. Static strength evaluation of six external skeletal fixation configurations. Vet Surg 1983; 12: 130-6.
- 13 Font J, Franch J, Cairo J. A review of 116 clinical cases treated with external fixators. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1997; 10: 173-82.
- 14 Fox SM, Bray JC, Guerin SR. et al. Antebrachial deformities in the dog: Treatment with external fixation. J Small Anim Pract 1995; 36: 315-20.
- 15 Harari J. External skeletal fixation. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1992; 22: 1-238.
- 16 Herndon GD, Egger EL, Fitzgerald DG. The effect of contouring the connecting column in the acrylic-pin external fixator. Vet Surg 1998; 27: 508.
- 17 Huiskes R, Chao EYS. A survey of finite element analysis in orthopaedic biomechanics: The first decade. J Biomech 1983; 16: 385-409.
- 18 Huiskes R, Chao EYS, Crippen TE. Parametric analyses of pin-bone stresses in external fracture fixation devices. J Orthop Res 1985; 03: 341-9.
- 19 Huiskes R, Verdonschot N. Biomechanics of artificial joints: The hip. in Mow VC, Hayes WC. (eds): Basic Orthopaedic Biomechanics (ed 2). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1997: 395-460.
- 20 Hulse D, Auer J, Nelson J. Finite element analysis of a fracture fixation system. Vet Surg 1987; 16: 93.
- 21 Johnson WD, Fischer DA. Skeletal stabilization with a multiplane external fixation device. Biomechanical evaluation and finite element model. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1983; 180: 34-43.
- 22 Kenwright J, Goodship AE. Controlled mechanical stimulation in the treatment of tibial fractures. Clin Orthopaedics 1989; 241: 36-47.
- 23 Nepola JV. External fixation. in Rockwood CA, Green DP. (eds): Fractures in Adults (ed 4). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1996: 229-59.
- 24 Okrasinski EB, Pardo AD, Graehler RA. Biomechanical evaluation of acrylic external skeletal fixation in dogs and cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1991; 199: 1590-3.
- 25 Oni OOA, Capper M, Soutis C. A finite element analysis of the effect of pin distribution on the rigidity of a unilateral external fixation system. Injury 1993; 24: 525-7.
- 26 Pollo FE, Hyman WA, Hulse DA. The role of the external bar in a 6-pin type I external skeletal fixation device. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1993; 06: 75-9.
- 27 Prendergast PJ. Finite element models in tissue mechanics and orthopaedic implant design. Clin Biomech 1997; 12: 343-66.
- 28 Roe SC, Keo T. Epoxy putty for free form external skeletal fixator. Vet Surg 1997; 26: 472-7.
- 29 Tomlinson JL, Constantinescu GM. Acrylic external skeletal fixation of fractures. Comp Con t Ed 1991; 13: 235-40.
- 30 Willer RL, Egger EL, Histand MB. Comparison of stainless steel versus acrylic for the connecting bar of external skeletal fixators. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1991; 27: 541-8.