RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634181
Labeling and Filtering of Medical Information on the Internet
Publikationsverlauf
Received:
00. Oktober 1997
Accepted after major revision:
00. November 1998
Publikationsdatum:
08. Februar 2018 (online)
Abstract
Internet information undergoes no quality controls and virtually anybody can publish anything. Because of this, it is difficult for searchers to take information retrieved from the Internet at face value. A related problem is the uncontrolled promotion of medical products on the Internet. A further problem of today’s Internet is that authors use no uniform keywords and other descriptive labels, which deteriorates the quality of search results. A solution for all these problems could be widespread use of descriptive and evaluative metainformation associated with medical Internet information. Our concept is based on a recently established infrastructure for assigning metadata to Internet information, the so-called PICS Standard (Platform for Internet Content Selection). We prototyped a PICS-based rating vocabulary for medical information (med-PICS), containing descriptive and evaluative categories, to be used by the webauthor and third-party label services (such as medical associations), respectively. We propose an international effort to assign metadata to medical Internet information.
-
References
- 1 Eysenbach G, Diepgen TL. Patients looking for information on the Internet and seeking tele-advice: Their motivation, expectations and misconceptions as expressed in electronic mails sent to doctors. Arch Dermatol 1999; 135: 151-6.
- 2 FDA/DHHS. FDA and the Internet – Advertising and Promotion of Medical Products. Transcripts of a FDA Conference, held 16-17 Oct 1996 in Silver Spring, MD; [published online at http://www.fda.gov/opacom/morechoices/transcript1096/fdainet.html , accessed 1.9.1997].
- 3 WHO.. General policy issues: Sale of medical products through the Internet. WHO Drug Information 1997; 11 (Suppl. 02) 51-2.
- 4 Weisbord SD, Soule JB, Kimmel PL. Brief Report: Poison on Line – Acute Renal Failure Caused by Oil of Wormwood Purchased through the Internet. N Engl J Med 1997; 337 (Suppl. 12) 825.
- 5 Coiera E. The Internet‘s challenge to health care provision – A free market in information will conflict with a controlled market in health care. [editorial] BMJ 1996; 312: 3-4 [also published online at http://www.bmj.combmj/archive/7022e.htm , accessed 4.8.97].
- 6 Impicciatore P, Pandolfini C, Casella N, Bonati M. Reliability of health information for the public on the world wide web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home. BMJ 1997; 314: 1875-81.
- 7 Culver JD, Gerr F, Frumkin H. Medical Information on the Internet: a study of an electronic bulletin board. J Gen Intern Med 1997; 12: 466-70.
- 8 Eysenbach G, Diepgen TL. Responses to Unsolicited Patient E-mail Requests for Medical Advice on the World Wide Web. JAMA 1998; 280: 1333-5.
- 9 Eysenbach G, Diepgen TL. Evaluation of Cyberdocs. Lancet 1998; 352: 1526.
- 10 Eysenbach G, Diepgen TL. Towards distributed quality management of medical information on the Internet. BMJ 1998; 317: 1496-500.
- 11 Smith A. Criteria for evaluation of Internet Information Ressources. [published online at http://www.vuw.ac.nz/dlis/courses/847/m2resev1.htm , accessed 4.8.97].
- 12 Kwan J. Criteria for evaluating Internet Information Ressources. University Library Skill; Guide No. 4 (P.S.105), Science & Engineering Library, University of Southern California: November 1993. [also published online at http://www-lib.usc.edu/Info/Sci/pubs/criteval.html , accessed 4.8.97].
- 13 Lehigh University Library Services: Evaluating Scholarly/Information Sites on the Web. [published online at http://moe.cc.lehigh.edu/guides/evaluating.web.html , accessed 4.8.97].
- 14 OMNI Advisory Group for Evaluation Criteria. OMNI guidelines for resource evaluation. [published online at http://www.omni.ac.uk/agec/evalguid.html , accessed 4.8.97].
- 15 Anagnostelis B, Cox J. Data on the Internet: Evaluating the Quality or "Less is More". In: Armstrong CJ, Hartley RJ. eds. UKOLUG State-of-the-Art Conference Warwick 17-19 July 1996 . London: UKOLUG; 1996: 59-69 [also published online at http://www.omni.ac.uk/agec/ukolug.html accessed 4.8.97].
- 16 Health On the Net Foundation. Code of Conduct for medical web sites. [published online at http://www.hon.ch/HONcode/Conduct.html , accessed 4.8.97].
- 17 BMIA-REC-Quality Standards for Medical Publishing on the Web-7/12/96. [published online at http://www.bhia.org/document_park/standards.htm , accessed 4.8.97].
- 18 Malet G. Medical Matrix Code of Conduct Beta Version 1.0. [published online at http://206.1.96.60/forums/Thread.cfm?CFApp = 3&Thread_ID = 33&mc = 2 , accessed 4.8.97].
- 19 Silberg M, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Chicago. Ill. Assessing, Controlling, and Assuring the Quality of Medical Information on the Internet. Caveant Lector et Viewor – Let the Reader and Viewer Beware. JAMA 1997; 277 7016 1244-5 [also published online at http://www.ama-assn.org/sci-pubs/journals/archive/jama/vol_277/no_15/ed7016/x.htm , accessed 28.8.1997].
- 20 Krauskopf T, Miller J, Resnick P, Treese GW. Label Syntax and Communication Protocols. The World Wide Web Journal 1996; 1 (Suppl. 04) 45-69. [also published online at http://w3.org/PICS/labels.html , accessed 4.8.97].
- 21 Miller J, Resnick P, Singer D. Rating Services and Rating Systems (and Their Machine-Readable Descriptions). The World Wide Web Journal 1996; 1 (Suppl. 04) 23-43. [also published online at http://w3.org/PICS/services.html , accessed 4.8.97].
- 22 Resnick P, Miller J. PICS: Internet Access Controls Without Censorship. Communications of the ACM, 1996; 39 (Suppl. 10) 87-93. [also published online at http://www.w3.org/PICS/iacwcv2.htm , accessed 4.8.97].
- 23 Resnick P. Filtering Information on the Internet. Scientific American, March 1997: 106-108 [also published online at http://www.sciam.com/0397issue/0397resnick.html , accessed 4.8.97].
- 24 Presler-Marshall M, Evans C, Feather CDW, Hopmann A, Resnick P. PICSRules 1.1, working draft 28.8.1997. [published online at http://www.w3.org/PICS/picsrules/spec11.htm , accessed 5.9.97].
- 25 Ambre J, Guard R, Perveiler FM, Renner J, Rippen H. et al. Criteria for Assessing the Quality of Health Information on the Internet, Working Draft White Paper,. 27 May 1997 [published online at http://www.mitre-tek.org/hiti/showcase/documents/criteria.html , accessed 28.8.1997].
- 26 Lindberg DA, Humphreys BL, McCray AT. The Unified Medical Language System. Methods Inf Med 1993; 32 (Suppl. 04) 281-91.
- 27 International Organization for Standardization. ISO 3166 Country Codes. 7.8.1997 [downloadable at ftp://info.ripe.net/iso3166-codes ].
- 28 Michigan Internet Health Kiosk Project. [published online at http://www.cancer.med.umich.edu/nwskiosk.html , accessed 5.9.97].
- 29 Electronic Frontier Foundation: Public interest principles for online filtration, ratings and labelling systems. Public Discussion Draft, Version 1.0b, 28. Feb. 1997 [published online at http://www.eff.org/pub/Net_info/Tools/Ratings_filters/eff_filter.principles , accessed 4.8.97].