An Activity-Theoretical Method for Studying User Participation in IS Design

Summary

Objectives: This paper aims to present an activity-theoretical method for studying the effects of user participation in IS development.

Methods: This method is developed through a case study of the process of designing a diabetes database.

Results and Conclusions: The method consists of a historical analysis of the design process, an ethno-graphical study of the use of the database, and researcher-driven interventions into the on-going user-producer interaction. In the historical analysis, we study particularly which user groups of the database have influenced the design work and which perspectives need to be incorporated into the design in the near future. An analytical model consisting of perspectives on local design, particular technology, and societal domain is introduced as a conceptual tool for this analysis. We also introduce the possibility of employing the historical analysis in guiding an ethno-graphical study of the user sites and researcher-driven interventions, which provide the participants with tools for improving their design process.

Keywords

Diabetes databases - activity theory - historical analysis - ethnography - interventions

• References

• 1 Greenbaum J, Kyng M. editors. Design at work, cooperative design of computer systems. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1991
• 2 Schuler D, Namioka A. editors. Participatory design, principles and practices. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1993
• 3 Ehn P. Scandinavian design: on participation and skill. In: Adler PS, Winograd T. editors. Usability, turning technologies into tools. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992. pp. 96-132.
• 4 Beyer H, Holzblatt K. Contextual design, defining customer centered systems. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers; 1998
• 5 Hearstatt C, von Hippel E. From experience: developing new product concepts via the lead user method. A case study in a “low tech” field. Journal of Product Innovation Management 1992; 9: 213-21.
• 6 Vygotsky LS. Mind in society, the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1978
• 7 Leontjev AN. Activity, consciousness, and personality. Moscow: Progress Publishers; 1978
• 8 Engeström Y, Escalante V. Mundane tool or object of affection? The rise and fall of postal buddy. In: Nardi B. editor. Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge (MA); MIT Press; 1995. pp. 325-73.
• 9 Nardi BA. Context and consciousness, activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1996
• 10 Miettinen R. Object construction and networks in research work, the case of research on cellulose degrading enzymes. Social Studies of Science 1998; 28: 423-63.
• 11 Hasu M. Constructing clinical use, an activity-theorectical perspective on implementing new technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 2000; 12: 369-82.
• 12 Engeström Y. From individual action to collective activity and back, developmental work research as an interventionist methodology. In: Luff P, Hindmarsh J. et al, editors. Workplace studies: recovering work practice and informing system design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000
• 13 Engeström Y. Collaborative expertise, expansive learning in medical work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; in press.
• 14 Miettinen R. The riddle of things, activity theory and actorn network theory as approaches of studying innovations. Mind, Culture, and Activity 1999; 6: 170-95.
• 15 Lehenkari J. Studying innovation trajectories and networks, the case of Benecol margarine. Science Studies 2000; 13: 50-67.
• 16 Latour B. Science in action, how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1987
• 17 Bijker WE, Law J. editors. Shaping technology/Building society, studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1992
• 18 Bijker WE, Hughes TP, Pinch TJ. The social construction of technological systems, new directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1987
• 19 Engeström Y. Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics 2000; 43: 960-74.
• 20 Engeström Y. Learning, working, imagining, twelve studies in activity theory. Helsinki: Orienta Consulting; 1990
• 21 Dewey J. Logic: the theory of inquiry. In: Boyndston JA. editor. The later works of John Dewey, volume 12. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press; 1986. pp. 108-20.