Two Patient Care Information Systems in the Same Hospital: Beyond Technical Aspects

Summary

Objectives: To compare two clinical workstations in one hospital with respect to technical, organizational, cultural and human factors. One clinical workstation was a GUI to the HIS. The other was an electronic patient record for stroke.

Methods: Data were collected by means of in-depth interviews with end-users of both clinical workstations. The interviews were audio taped and transcribed for analysis.

Results: End users assessed both clinical workstations as user friendly. Coordination between health care workers was perceived to be enhanced. However, in both situations poor communication between management, implementers and users resulted in uncertainty and skepticism about future perspectives. Furthermore, it appeared that inpatient and outpatient settings needed clinical workstations with different requirements for an optimal fit between work practices and information system.

Conclusions: Regardless of the domain and content of a workstation, it can support coordination between disciplines. The communication concerning the information technology strategy deserves much attention. Finally, the requirements for inpatient and outpatient workstations differ.

Keywords

Computerized medical records systems - hospital information systems - evaluation studies

• References

• 1 Ash JS. Managing change: Analysis of a hypothetical case. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000; 7: 125-34.
• 2 Aydin CE, Rice RE. Social worlds, individual differences, and implementation. Predicting attitudes toward a medical information system. Information & Management 1991; 20: 119-36.
• 3 Franz CR, Robey D. Organizational context, user involvement, and the usefulness of information systems. Decision Sciences 1986; 17: 329-56.
• 4 Brooke C, Maguire S. Systems Development: A Restrictive Practice?. Int J Inform Manag 1998; 18 (Suppl. 03) 165-80.
• 5 Lorenzi NM, Riley RT. Organizational aspects of health informatics, managing technological change. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1994
• 6 Berg M. Considerations for sociotechnical design: experiences with an electronic patient record in a clinical context. Int J Med Inf 1998; 52: 243-51.
• 7 Van der Meijden MJ, Tange HJ, Boiten J, Troost J, Hasman A. An experimental electronic patient record for stroke patients, part 2: system description. Int J Med Inf 2000; 58/59: 127-40.
• 8 Kaplan B, Lundsgaarde H. Toward an evaluation of an integrated clinical imaging system: identifying clinical benefits. Methods Inf Med 1996; 35: 221-9.
• 9 Ash J. Organizational factors that influence information technology diffusion in academic health science centers. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997; 4: 102-11.
• 10 Martin-Baranera M, Planas I, Palau J, Miralles M, Sancho JJ, Sanz F. Assessing physician’s expectations and attitudes toward hospital information systems. The IMASIS experience. MD Comput 1999; 2: 73-6.
• 11 Strauss A, Fagerhaugh S, Suczek B, Wiener C. Social organization of medical work. 2nd edition. New Brunswick (NJ): Transaction Publishers; 1997
• 12 Goodhue DL, Thompson RL. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly 1995; 19: 213-36.
• 13 Hebert MA. Impact of IT on health care professionals: changes in work and the productivity paradox. Health Serv Manage Res 1998; 11: 69-79.