Sociotechnical Requirements Analysis for Clinical Systems

Summary

Objective: We explore sociotechnical requirements by examining the use of a computerized patient record system in an intensive care unit of a U.S. hospital and present two sociotechnical requirements, awareness and coordination, embedded in the users’ work.

Method: The study is based on observation during seven months of the use of a computerized patient record system in a surgical intensive care unit. During that period semi-formal interviews, informal interviews were held.

Results and Conclusions: A key step in the design of clinical systems is the development and analysis of requirements. However, traditional requirements analysis is based on a set of assumptions that break down in the highly collaborative, exception-filled clinical domain. Sociotechnical requirement analysis enabled the designers to gather a much richer description of the environment surrounding the computer system, highlighting awareness and coordination, embedded in the users’ work.

Keywords

Sociotechnical requirements analysis - clinical systems - computerized patient record system - collaborative work - intensive care unit

• References

• 1 Robertson S, Robertson J. Mastering the requirements process. Menlo Park: ACM Press; 1999
• 2 The Standish Group. The Chaos Report. [Online]. 1994 [cited 2001]. Available from URL: www.pm2go.com/sample_research/chaos_1994_1.asp
• 3 Travers DA, Downs SM. Comparing user acceptance of a computer system in two pediatric offices: a qualitative study. Proc AMIA Symp 2000; 853-7.
• 4 Barley SR. Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1986; 31: 78-108.
• 5 Heath C, Luff P. Documents and professional practice,‘bad’ organisational reasons for ‘good’ clinical records. ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 1996; 354-63.
• 6 Goddard BL. Termination of a Contract to Implement an Enterprise Electronic Medical Record System. J Am Med Inf Assoc 2000; 7: 564-8.
• 7 Jirotka M, Goguen J. Requirements engineering, social and technical Issues. San Diego: Academic Press Limited; 1994
• 8 Daley E. Management of software development. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 1997; 3: 229-42.
• 9 Boehm BW. Software Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 1976; 1: 1226-41.
• 10 Jackson M. Software requirements and specifications. Menlo Park: Addison-Wesley; 1999
• 11 NCC. The STARTS Purchasers’ Handbook. UK: NCC; 1989
• 12 McDermid JA. Requirements analysis: Orthodoxy, fundamentalism, and heresy. In: M. Jirotka M, Gougen J. editors. Requirements engineering, social and technical issues. San Diego: Academic Press; 1994. pp. 17-40.
• 13 Gougen JA, Linde C. Techniques for requirements elicitation. IEEE Conference on Requirements Engineering 1999; 152-64.
• 14 Baggs JG. Intensive care unit use and collaboration between nurses and physicians. Heart Lung 1989; 18: 332-8.
• 15 Berg M. Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach. Int J Med Inf 1999; 55: 87-101.
• 16 Forsythe DE, Buchanan BG, Osheroff JA, Miller RA. Expanding the concept of medical information, an observational study of physicians’ information needs. Computers and Biomedical Research 1992; 25: 181-200.
• 17 Baggs JG, Schmitt MH, Mushlin AI, Mitchell PH, Eldredge DH, Oakes D, Hutson AD. Association between nurse-physician collaboration and patient outcomes in three intensive care units. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 1991-8.
• 18 Symon G, Long K, Ellis J. The Coordination of work activities: cooperation and conflict in a hospital context. Comp Supp Coop Work 1996; 5: 1-31.
• 19 Katzenberg B, Pickard F, McDermott J. Computer support for clinical practice: embedding and evolving protocols of care. ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 1996
• 20 Berg M, Langenberg C vd Berg, Kwakkernaat JK. Considerations for sociotechnical design, experiences with an electronic patient record in a clinical context. Int J Med Inf 1998; 52: 243-51.
• 21 Strauss A, Fagerhaugh S, Suczek B, Wiener C. Social organization of medical work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1985
• 22 Bikson T, Eveland J. Groupware implementation, reinvention in the sociotechnical frame. ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 1996; 428-37.
• 23 Viller S, Sommerville I. Social analysis in the requirements engineering process: from ethnography to method. IEEE Conference on Requirements Engineering 1999; 6-13.
• 24 Sommerville I, Rodden T, Sawyer P, Bentley R, Twidale M. Integrating ethnography into the requirements engineering process. Requirements Engineering 1992; 165-73.
• 25 Bentley R, Hughes JA, Randall D, Rodden T, Sawyer P, Shapiro D, Summerville I. Ethno-graphically-informed systems design for air traffic control. ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 1992; 123-29.
• 26 Heath C, Luff P. Collaboration and control: crisis management and multimedia technology in London Underground line control rooms. Comp Supp Coop Work 1992; 1: 69-118.
• 27 Hughes J, King V, Rodden T, Anderson H. Moving out of the control room, ethnography in system design. ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 1994; 429-39.
• 28 Sommerville I. Software engineering. San Francisco: Addison-Wesley; 2001
• 29 Berg M. Accumulating and coordinating, occasions for information technologies in medical work. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work 1999; 8: 373-401.
• 30 Forsythe DE. Using ethnography to investigate life scientists’ information needs. Bulletin of Medical Library Association 1998; 86: 402-9.
• 31 Hughes JA, Randall D, Shapiro D. Faltering from ethnography to design. ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 1992; 115-22.
• 32 Shabot MM. The HP CareVue clinical information system. International Journal of Clinical Monitoring Computing 1997; 14: 177-84.
• 33 Dourish P, Bellotti V. Awareness and Coordination in Shared Workspaces. ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 1992; 107-14.
• 34 Bricon-Souf N, Renard JM, Beuscart R. Dynamic workflow model for complex activity in intensive care unit. Medinfo 1998; 9: 227-31.
• 35 Berg M, Bowker G. The multiple bodies of the medical record, toward a sociology of an artifact. The Sociological Quarterly 1997; 38: 511-35.
• 36 Malone TW, Crowston K. The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys 1994; 26: 87-119.