PDF herunterladen
Methods Inf Med 2002; 41(04): 342-348
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634392
Original article
Schattauer GmbH

Implications of Nondifferential Misclassification on Estimates of Attributable Risk

C. Vogel
1   Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
,
O. Gefeller
1   Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received 30. November 2001

Accepted 31. Januar 2002

Publikationsdatum:
07. Februar 2018 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints

Summary

Objectives: Only the effects of isolated nondifferential misclassification of exposure or disease on the estimates of attributable risk have been discussed in the literature. The aim of this paper is to broaden the spectrum of scenarios for which implications of misclassification are available.

Methods: For this purpose, a matrix-based approach allowing a comprehensive, unified analysis of various structures of misclassification is introduced. The relative bias or – in the situation of covariate misclassification – the relative adjustment are presented for the different misclassification scenarios.

Results: Under nondifferential misclassification of exposure or disease, the attributable risk is biased towards the null with the only exception of perfect sensitivity of exposure classification or perfect specificity of disease classification both leading to an unbiased attributable risk. From these two marginal effects, the consequences of simultaneous nondifferential independent misclassification of exposure and disease on the attributable risk are derived in the matrix-based approach. Misclassification of a dichotomous covariate leads to partial adjustment.

Conclusions: To a large extent, the results for the attributable risk are in accordance with the well-known results for the relative risk. The algebraic differences between the two risk measures, however, make it necessary to repeat the methodological considerations for the attributable risk.

Keywords

Epidemiology - epidemiologic methods - bias - confounding factors (epidemiology) - effect modifiers (epidemiology)
 

  • References

  • 1 Barron BA. The effects of misclassification on the estimation of relative risk. Biometrics 1977; 33 (Suppl. 02) 414-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Blettner M, Wahrendorf J. What does an observed relative risk convey about possible misclassification?. Methods Inf Med 1984; 23 (Suppl. 01) 37-40.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Copeland KT, Checkoway H, McMichael AJ, Holbrook RH. Bias due to misclassification in the estimation of relative risk. Am J Epidemiol 1977; 105 (Suppl. 05) 488-95.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Cox B, Elwood JM. The effect on the stratum-specific odds ratios of nondifferential misclassification of a dichotomous covariate. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 133 (Suppl. 02) 202-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Flegal KM, Brownie C, Haas JD. The effects of exposure misclassification on estimates of relative risk. Am J Epidemiol 1986; 123 (Suppl. 04) 736-51.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Greenland S. The effect of misclassification in the presence of covariates. Am J Epidemiol 1980; 112 (Suppl. 04) 564-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Greenland S, Kleinbaum DG. Correcting for misclassification in two-way tables and matched-pair studies. Int J Epidemiol 1983; 12 (Suppl. 01) 93-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rippin G. Design issues and sample size when exposure measurement is inaccurate. Methods Inf Med 2001; 40 (Suppl. 02) 137-40.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Savitz DA, Baron AE. Estimating and correcting for confounder misclassification. Am J Epidemiol 1989; 129 (Suppl. 05) 1062-71.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Tzonou A, Kaldor J, Smith PG, Day NE, Trichopoulos D. Misclassification in case-control studies with two dichotomous risk factors. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 1986; 34 (Suppl. 01) 10-7.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Armstrong BG. Effect of measurement error on epidemiological studies of environmental and occupational exposures. Occup Environ Med 1998; 55 (Suppl. 10) 651-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Brenner H, Gefeller O. Use of the positive predictive value to correct for disease misclassification in epidemiologic studies. Am J Epidemiol 1993; 138 (Suppl. 11) 1007-15.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Holcroft CA, Spiegelman D. Design of validation studies for estimating the odds ratio of exposure- disease relationships when exposure is misclassified. Biometrics 1999; 55 (Suppl. 04) 1193-201.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Marshall RJ. Confounder prevalence and stratum-specific relative risks: implications for misclassified and missing confounders. Epidemiology 1994; 5 (Suppl. 04) 439-42.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Weinkam JJ, Rosenbaum WL, Sterling TD. Recovering true risks when multilevel exposure and covariables are both misclassified. Am J Epidemiol 1999; 150 (Suppl. 08) 886-91.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Thürigen D, Spiegelman D, Blettner M, Heuer C, Brenner H. Measurement error correction using validation data: a review of methods and their applicability in case-control studies. Stat Methods Med Res 2000; 9 (Suppl. 05) 447-74.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Tinnerberg H, Bjork J, Welinder H. Evaluation of occupational and leisure time exposure assessment in a population-based case control study on leukaemia. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2001; 74 (Suppl. 08) 533-40.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lash TL, Silliman RA. A sensitivity analysis to separate bias due to confounding from bias due to predicting misclassification by a variable that does both. Epidemiology 2000; 11 (Suppl. 05) 544-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Emsley CL, Gao S, Hall KS, Hendrie HC. Estimating odds ratios adjusting for misclassification in Alzheimer’s disease risk factor assessment. Stat Med 2000; 19 11-12 1523-30. L (pii).
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Koster M, Alfredsson L, Michelsen H, Vingard E, Kilbom A. Retrospective versus original information on physical and psychosocial exposure at work. Scand J Work Environ Health 1999; 25 (Suppl. 05) 410-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hsieh CC. The effect of non-differential outcome misclassification on estimates of the attributable and prevented fraction. Stat Med 1991; 10 (Suppl. 03) 361-73.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Hsieh CC, Walter SD. The effect of non-differential exposure misclassification on estimates of the attributable and prevented fraction. Stat Med 1988; 7 (Suppl. 10) 1073-85.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Walter SD. Effects of interaction, confounding and observational error on attributable risk estimation. Am J Epidemiol 1983; 117 (Suppl. 05) 598-604.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Levin ML. The occurrence of lung cancer in man. Acta Unio Int Contra Cancrum 1953; 9: 531-41.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Walter SD. Prevention for multifactorial diseases. Am J Epidemiol 1980; 112 (Suppl. 03) 409-16.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Whittemore AS. Statistical methods for estimating attributable risk from retrospective data. Stat Med 1982; 1 (Suppl. 03) 229-43.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Benichou J. A review of adjusted estimators of attributable risk. Stat Methods Med Res 2001; 10 (Suppl. 03) 195-216.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Vogel C, Land M, Gefeller O. Effects of independent non-differential misclassification on the attributable risk. In: Gaul W, Ritter G. eds. Classification, Automation, and New Media, Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the GfKl. Berlin: Springer; 2002: 515-22.
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Greenland S. Basic methods of sensitivity analysis and external adjustment. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S. editors. Modern Epidemiology. 2 ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998. p. 343-357.
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Vogel C, Gefeller O. The effects of simultaneous misclassification on the attributable risk. In: Opitz O, Schwaiger M. eds. Exploratory Data Analysis in Empirical Research, Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the GfKl. Berlin: Springer; 2002: 392-400.
    Google Scholar