Consultation of Medical Narratives in the Electronic Medical Record

H. J. Tange

doi:10.1055/s-0038-1634417

Methods of Information in Medicine, Table of Contents

Methods Inf Med 1999; 38(04/05): 289-293
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634417

Original Article

Schattauer GmbH

Consultation of Medical Narratives in the Electronic Medical Record

H. J. Tange

¹Department of Medical Informatics, Maastricht University, The Netherlands

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

This article presents an overview of a research project concerning the consultation of medical narratives in the electronic medical record (EMR). It describes an analysis of user needs, the design and implementation of a prototype EMR system, and the evaluation of the ease of consultation of medical narratives when using this system. In a questionnaire survey, 85 hospital physicians judged the quality of their paper-based medical record with respect to data entry, information retrieval and some other aspects. Participants were more positive about the paper medical record than the literature suggests. They wished to maintain the flexibility of data entry but indicated the need to improve the retrieval of information. A prototype EMR system was developed to facilitate the consultation of medical narratives. These parts were divided into labeled segments that could be arranged source-oriented and problem-oriented. This system was used to evaluate the ease of information retrieval of 24 internists and 12 residents at a teaching hospital when using free-text medical narratives divided at different levels of detail. They solved, without time pressure, some predefined problems concerning three voluminous, inpatient case records. The participants were randomly allocated to a sequence that was balanced by patient case and learning effect. The division of medical narratives affected speed, but not completeness of information retrieval. Progress notes divided into problem-related segments could be consulted 22% faster than when undivided. Medical history and physical examination divided into segments at organ-system level could be consulted 13% faster than when divided into separate questions and observations. These differences were statistically significant. The fastest divisions were also appreciated as the best combination of easy searching and best insight in the patient case. The results of our evaluation study suggest a trade-off between searching and reading: too much detailed segments will delay the consultation of medical narratives. Validation of the results in daily practice is recommended.

Keywords

Electronic Medical Record - Medical Narratives - Information Retrieval - Structure - User Needs

Full Text

References

REFERENCES
1 What is an Electronic Patient Record? World Wide Web 1995 htpm://www.medrecinst.com/mri/levels.html (page not available any more).
2 Dick RS, Steen EB. eds. The computer-based patient record – an essential technology for health care . Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1991
3 Tange HJ, Hasman A, de Vries Robbé PF, Schouten HC. Medical narratives in electronic medical records: a literature review. Int J Med Inform 1997; 46: 7-29.
4 Tange HJ. The paper-based medical record: Is it really so bad?. Comput Meth Prog Biomed 1995; 48: 127-32.
5 Tange HJ. How to approach the structuring of the medical record? Towards a model for flexible access to free text medical data. Int J Biomed Comput 1996; 42: 27-34.
6 Barnett GO. The application of computer-based medical-record systems in ambulatory practice. N Engl J Med 1984; 310: 1643-50.
7 McDonald CJ, Blevins L, Tierney WM, Martin DK. The Regenstrief medical records. Comput 1988; 5: 34-47.
8 Safran C, Rury C, Rind DM, Taylor WC. A computer-based outpatient medical record for a teaching hospital. Comput 1991; 8: 291-9.
9 Scherrer JR, Baud RH, Hochstrasser D, Ratib O. An integrated hospital information system in Geneva. Comput 1990; 7: 81-9.
10 Stead WW, Hammond WE. Computer-based medical records: the centerpiece of TMR. Comput 1988; 5: 48-62.
11 McDonald CJ, Barnett GO. Medical-record systems. In: Shortliffe EH, and Perreault LE. eds. Medical Informatics - Computer Applications in Health Care.,. vol., Shortliffe EH. and Perreault LE. eds. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley; 1990. pp. 181-218.
12 Weed LL. Medical records that guide and teach. N Engl J Med 1968; 278: 593-600 652-7.
13 Tange HJ, Dreessen VAB, Hasman A, Donkers HHLM. An experimental electronic medical-record system with multiple views on medical narratives. Comput Meth Prog Biomed 1997; 50: 157-72.
14 Tange HJ, Schouten HC, Kester ADM, Hasman A. The granularity of medical narratives and its effect on the speed and completeness of information retrieval. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998; 5: 571-82.
15 Nygren E, Johnson M, Henriksson P. Reading the medical record. II. Design of a human-computer interface for basic reading of computerized medical records. Comput Meth Prog Biomed 1992; 39: 13-25.
16 Poon AD, Fagan LM. PEN-Ivory: the design and evaluation of a pen-based computer system for structured data entry. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994: 447-51.
17 Barrows Jr RC, Johnson SB. A data model that captures clinical reasoning about patient problems. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995: 402-5.
18 van Ginneken AM, Stam H. Can one patient record accommodate the diversity of specialized care?. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995: 406-10.
19 Heathfield HA, Kirby J, Hardiker NR. Data entry in computer-based care planning. Comput Meth Prog Biomed 1995; 48: 103-7.
20 McDonald CJ, Tierney WM, Blevins L. The benifits of automated medical record systems for ambulatory care. In: Orthner HF, and Blum BI. eds. Implementing health care information systems . New York: Springer-Verlag; 1988
21 Poon AD, Fagan LM, Shortliffe EH. The PEN-Ivory project: Exploring user-interface design for the selection of items from large controlled vocabularies in medicine. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1996; 3: 168-83.