RSS-Feed abonnieren
Bitte kopieren Sie die angezeigte URL und fügen sie dann in Ihren RSS-Reader ein.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/de/10.1055-s-00035037.xml
Methods Inf Med 1998; 37(03): 307-308
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634525
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634525
Commentary
A Comment on Gefeller and Brenner's Chance-Corrected Sensitivity and Specificity
Weitere Informationen
Publikationsverlauf
Publikationsdatum:
14. Februar 2018 (online)
-
REFERENCES
- 1 Connell FA, Koepsell TD. Measures of gain in certainty from a diagnostic test. Am J Epidemiol 1985; 121: 744-53.
- 2 Kraemer HC. The robustness of common measures of 2 x 2 association to bias due to misclassifications. Am Stat 1985; 39: 286-90.
- 3 Kraemer HC. Assessment of 2 x 2 associations: generalization of signal-detection methodology. Am Stat 1988; 42: 37-49.
- 4 Kraemer HC, Bloch DA. Kappa coefficients in epidemiology: an appraisal of a reappraisal. J Clin Epidemiol 1988; 41: 959-68.
- 5 Coughlin SS, Pickle LW. Sensitivity and specificity-like measures of the validity of a diagnostic test that are corrected for chance agreement. Epidemiology 1992; 3: 178-81.
- 6 Jamart J. Chance-corrected sensitivity and specificity for three-zone diagnostic tests. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45: 1035-7.
- 7 Jamart J. Rejoinder: chance-corrected sensitivity and specificity for three-zone diagnostic tests. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46: 206.
- 8 Gefeller O, Brenner H. How to correct for chance agreement in the estimation of sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests. Meth Inform Med 1994; 33: 180-6.
- 9 Brenner H, Gefeller O. Chance-corrected measures of the validity of a binary diagnostic test. J Clin Epidemiol 1994; 47: 627-33.
- 10 Diamond GA, Denton TA. Alternative perspectives on the biased foundations of medical technology assessment. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118: 455-64.
- 11 Diamond GA. Monkey business. Am J Cardiol 1986; 57: 471-5.