How Groups Co-ordinate their Concepts and Terminology: Implications for Medical Informatics

Abstract

Conceptual and terminological systems are established and maintained by the communities who use them. This paper reports experiments which investigate the role of communication and interaction in the process. The experiments show that isolated pairs of communicators and virtual communities of interacting pairs naturally converge on their own conceptual and terminological systems when confronted with a common task. The results also indicate that the system converged on is optimal for that particular group engaged in that particular task. These findings are discussed in relation to the increasing use of tightly coordinated medical teams and its implications for getting them to adopt standardized medical terminologies.

Keywords

Concepts - Medical Terminology - Communication

• REFERENCES

• 1 Bruner JS, Goodnow J, Austin GA. A Study of Thinking. New York: Wiley; 1956
• 2 Biederman I. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review 1987; 94: 115-47.
• 3 Schank R. Conceptual dependency: a theory of natural language understanding. Cognitive Psychology 1972; 3: 552-631.
• 4 Schyns PG, Goldstone RL, Thibaut JP. The development of features in object concepts. Behaviour and Brain Sciences. (in press).
• 5 Murphy GL, Medin D. The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review 1985; 92: 289-316.
• 6 Glucksberg S, Danks JH. Experimental Psycholinguistics: an introduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1975
• 7 Anderson A, Garrod S. The dynamics of referential meaning in spontaneous dialogue: some preliminary studies. In: Reilly R. ed. Communication failure in dialogue and discourse. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1987: 161-83.
• 8 Garrod S, Anderson A. Saying what you mean in dialogue: a study in conceptual and semantic coordination. Cognition 1987; 27: 181-218.
• 9 Garrod S, Doherty G. Conversation, coordination and convention: an empirical investigation of how groups establish linguistic conventions. Cognition 1994; 53: 181-215.
• 10 Levelt WJM. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.;
• 11 Clark HH, Wilkes-Gibbs D. Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition 1986; 22: 1-39.