Read Codes Version 3: A User Led Terminology

Abstract:

Version 3 of the Read Codes was designed in response to a new set of requirements generated by three new terming initiatives in the UK, the Clinical Terms Project, the Professions Allied to Medicine Terms Project and the Nursing Terms Project. The challenge was to cope with the detail required by clinical specialists for maintaining a computerised record, to capture the natural language used by clinicians in their everyday work, and to support efficient analysis across medical records required to extract information from clinicians’ individual patient data. The structure of Version 3 allows a directed acyclic graph to replace the traditional hierarchy; permits multiple such graphs if necessary; introduces qualifiers, embedding these in an information model to support analysis; introduces one-to-many mapping to external classifications where this is necessary; and maintains the tradition of a dynamic terminology that stresses the inclusion of natural clinical terms.

Keywords:

Read Codes - Terminology - Classification - Coding System - Knowledge Representation

• References

• 1 Read Codes File Structure, Version 3.1: The qualifier extensions. NHS CCC Technical Report. 1994
• 2 Read Codes File Structure, Version 3: Technical Overview and Technical Description. NHS CCCTechnical Report 1994; 1-16.
• 3 Read JD, Benson TJR. Comprehensive coding. Br J Health Camp 1986; May: 22-25.
• 4 GMSC-RCGP Joint Computing Group Technical Working Party. The classification of general practive data. JCG 1978; 88 20.
• 5 International Classification of Diseases. Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries and Causes of Death: 9th Revision. Geneva: WHO; 1977
• 6 International Classification of Diseases. 10th revision. Geneva: WHO; 1992
• 7 Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. Classification of Surgical Operations and Procedures, (Fourth Revision). London: OPCS; 1987
• 8 Read Codes evaluation study: Outline methodology proposal. NHS CCC Technical Report. 1994
• 9 Cote RA, Rothwell DJ, Palotay JL, Beckett RS, Brochu L. The Systematized Nomenclature of Human and Veterinary Medicine – SNOM ED International (4 volumes). College of American Pathologists; April 1993
• 10 Cimino JJ, Clayton PD, Hripcsak G, Johnson S. Knowledge-based approaches to the maintenance of a large controlled medical terminology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994; 1: 35-50.
• 11 Campbell KE, Musen MA. Representation of clinical data using SNOMED III and conceptual graphs. Stanford CA: Stanford University; Knowledge Systems Laboratory Report KSL-92-13. 1992
• 12 Sager N, Lyman M, Nhan NT, Tick LJ. Medical language processing: applications to patient data representation and automatic encoding. Meth Inform Med 1995; 34: 140-6.
• 13 Rector AL, Nowlan W A, Kay S. Unifying medical information using an architecture based on descriptions. In: Miller RA. ed. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. New York: IEEE Comp Soc Press; 1990: 190-4.