Medical Informatics: Once More Towards Systematization

Abstract:

Commenting on a paper by Van Bemmel (Medical Informatics, Art or Science? [1]), the following questions are raised: What is the meaning of medical informatics?, How to systematize medical informatics?, Is medical informatics an art, a science or a technology?. It is argued that medical informatics is concerned with the systematic processing of data, information and knowledge in medicine and health care, and that medical informatics is not just the application of computers in these fields. Three classifications for medical informatics research and education are presented. It is concluded that medical informatics is a scientific medical discipline, similar to surgery, internal medicine, epidemiology, or microbiology; and that medical informatics has a strong relationship with the health sciences concerning its field of application, and to informatics concerning its methods and tools. It is a cross-sectional discipline, with relevance for virtually all other specialties of medicine and the health sciences. This is the reason for its impact on research and education in these specialties. It also causes that the quality of the processing of data, information and knowledge has a direct and considerable effect upon the quality of health care in practically all these specialties.

Keywords:

Medical Informatics - Health Informatics - Medicine - Health Care

• References

• 1 Van Bemmel JH. Medical informatics, art or science?. Meth Inform Med 1996; 35: 157-72.
• 2 Van Bemmel JH. A comprehensive model for medical information processing. Meth Inform Med 1983; 22: 124-30.
• 3 Van Bemmel JH. The structure of medical informatics. Med Inform 1984; 9: 175-80.
• 4 Reichertz PL. Towards systematisation. Meth Inform Med 1977; 16: 125-30.
• 5 Reichem PL. Preparing for change: concepts and education in medical informatics. Comput Meth Programs Biomed 1987; 25: 89-102.
• 6 Van Bemmel JH. Decision support in medicine: comparative support and impact on the medical curriculum. In: Rienhoff O, Piccolo U, Schneider B. eds. Expert Systems and Decision Support in Medicine. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1988: 3-15
• 7 Hasman A. et al. A systematic view on medical informatics. Comp Meth Progr Biomed. (to be publ).
• 8 Haux R. Aims and tasks of medical informatics. Internat J Bio-Med Comp. (to be publ).
• 9 Haux R, Leven FJ. Twenty years medical informatics education at Heidelberg/Heilbronn: Evolution of a specialized curriculum for medical informatics. Meth Inform Med 1994; 33: 285-9 (also published in Van Bemmel JH, McCray AT, eds. IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics 1994. Stuttgart: Schattauer 1994:111-5.)
• 10 Dimitrov I. The questions of medical informatics. Meth Inform Med 1996; 35: 81-1.
• 11 Recommendations of the German Association of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology on Education in Medical Informatics. Meth Inform Med 1992; 31: 60-70 (also published in Hasman A et al., eds. Education and Training in Health Informatics in Europe. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1995: 111-29.
• 12 Leiner F. et al. Medizinische Dokumentation. Stuttgart: Schattauer Verlag; 1985
• 13 Protti DJ. et al. Can Health/Medical Informatics be regarded as a separate discipline?. Meth Inform Med 1995; 33: 318-26 (also published in Van Bemmel JH, McCray AT, eds. IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics 1995. Stuttgart: Schattauer Verlag 1995: 617-25.)
• 14 Smullyan RM. The Tao is Silent. New York: Harper & Row; 1977