Medical Reasoning and Patient Requests in Decision-Making for Female Genitourinary Infections

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate General Practitioners’ (GPs’) collection and analysis of data on women presenting with lower genitourinary (GU) complaints, also taking into account patient preferences. For 135 patients seen after nurse triage, eleven GPs recorded the clinical data they had explored, an evaluation of the patient’s desire (or not) for medical interventions, a preliminary diagnosis with certainty estimate, and management actions.

Whether a clinical data item was explored varied between 97% of the patients for fever to 15% for pelvic examination. Decisions regarding diagnosis followed to a large extent results from screening laboratory tests. For prescription of antibiotics the patient’s desire (or not) for medical interventions was a significant discriminant. The GPs reported the lowest diagnostic certainty for diagnosis of urethritis, the highest for cystitis. Factors contributing to physicians’ uncertainty in their decisionmaking were assumed patient reluctance for medical interventions and negative screening tests.

In conclusion, patient requests and preferences significantly influenced the GPs, even though results from screening laboratory tests were mainly used as the basis for decisions. The high reliance on screening tests may often cause other clinical information to be neglected. Thus, the uncertainty regarding patients with negative laboratory test results may reflect that important information is not included in the clinical analysis.

Key-Words

Genitourinary Infections - Decision-Making - Patient Participation - Practice Research - Doctor-Patient Relation

• REFERENCES

• 1 Stamm WE, Hooton TM, Johnson JR. et al. Urinary tract infections: from pathogenesis to treatment. J Infect Dis 1989; 159: 400-6.
• 2 Dobbs FF, Fleming DM. A simple scoring system for evaluating symptoms, history and urine dipstick testing in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection. J R Coll Gen Pract 1987; 37: 100-4.
• 3 Timpka T, Bjurulf P, Buur T. Audit in primary care: The case of genitourinary infections. Scand J Inf Dis 1990; 22: 49-57.
• 4 Howie JGR. Clinical judgement and antibiotic use in general practice. Br Med J 1976; ii: 1061-4.
• 5 O’Dowd TC, Small JE, West RR. Clinical judgement in the diagnosis, management, frequency and dysuria in general practice. Br Med J 1984; 288: 1347-9.
• 6 Eisenberg JM. Sociological influences on decision-making by clinicians. Ann Intern Med 1979; 90: 957-64.
• 7 Brody DS. The patient’s role in medical decisions. Ann Int Med 1980; 93: 718-22.
• 8 Weiner J. A comparison of primary care in the USA, Denmark, Finland and Sweden: Lessons for Scandinavia?. Scand J Prim Health Care 1988; 06: 13-27.
• 9 Freidson E. Coping with work problems. Doctoring Together. A Study of Professional Social Control. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1975: 39-102.
• 10 Timpka T, Arborelius E. The primary care nurse’s dilemmas: a study of knowledge use and needs during telephone consultations. Advanced Nursing 1990; 15: 1457-69.
• 11 Hallander HO, Kallner A, Lundin A. et al. Evaluation of rapid methods for the detection of bacteriuria in primary health care. Acta Microbiol Immunol Scand (sect B) 1986; 94: 39-49.
• 12 SPSS-X User’s Guide. New York: SPSS Inc; 1983
• 13 Howie JGR, Porter AMD, Forbes JF. Quality and the use of time in general practice; widening the discussion. Br Med J 1989; 298: 1008-10.
• 14 Aronsson K, Sätterlund-Larsson U. Politeness strategies and doctor-patient communication. On the social choreography of collaborative thinking. J Lang Soc Psychol 1987; 06: 1-27.
• 15 Sätterlund-Larsson U, Svärdsudd K, Wedel H, Säljö R. Patient involvement in surgical and orthopaedic practice. The project perioperative risk. Soc Sci Med 1989; 28: 829-35.
• 16 Vertinsky IB, Thompson WA, Uyeno D. Measuring consumer desire for participation in clinical decision-making. Health Serv Res 1974; 09: 121-34.
• 17 Sorensen JR. Biomedical innovation, uncertainty, and doctor-patient interaction. J Health Soc Behav 1974; 15: 366-74.
• 18 Fihn SD, Johnson C, Roberts PL, Running K, Stamm WE. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for acute dysuria in women: a single-dose or 10-day course. Ann Intern Med 1988; 108: 350-7.
• 19 Trienekens TA, Stobberingh EE, Winkens RA, Houben AW. Different lengths of treatment with co-trimoxazole for acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women. Brit Med J 1989; 299: 1319-22.
• 20 Berg AO, Heidrich FE, Fihn SD. et al. Establishing the cause of genitourinary symptoms in women in a family practice. JAMA 1984; 251: 620-5.
• 21 Komaroff AL, Pass TM, McCue JD. et al. Management strategies for urinary and vaginal infections. Arch Intern Med 1978; 138: 1069-73.
• 22 Timpka T, Bjurulf P. The semantics of diagnosis and management of genitourinary infections: a cross-specialty study. Fam Pract 1989; 06: 279-85.
• 23 Ferry S, Burman LG, Mattson B. Urinary tract infection in primary health care in northern Sweden. II. Clinical presentation. Scand J Prim Health Care 1987; 05: 176-80.
• 24 Parsons CL, Schmidt JD, Pollen JJ. Successful treatment of interstitial cystitis with sodium pentosanpolysulfate. J Urol 1983; 130: 51-55.
• 25 Balla JI. Logical thinking and the decisio process. Meth Inf Med 1980; 19: 88-92.
• 26 Pill R. Models and management: the case of “cystitis” in women. Soc Health Illness 1987; 09: 265-85.
• 27 Wigton RS, Hoellerich VL, Ornato JP. et al. Use of clinical findings in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in women. Arch Intern Med 1985; 145: 2222-7.
• 28 Marklund B, Bengtsson C. Medical advice by telephone at Swedish Health Centers: Who calls and what are the problems?. Fam Pract 1989; 06: 42-6.
• 29 Robinson G. The future for practice nurses (editorial). Br J Gen Pract 1990; 41: 132-3.