Student Perceptions of the Ophthalmology Curriculum in Medical School

Abstract

Purpose There is no national standard for ophthalmology curricula in U.S. and Canadian medical schools. We aim to evaluate medical students' perceptions of the current ophthalmology curriculum without mandatory rotation at New York University School of Medicine (NYUSOM).

Design A cross-sectional Internet survey.

Methods A cross-sectional Internet survey was distributed to all NYUSOM students in March to May 2017. The main parameters measured in the study were students' self-reported confidence with ophthalmology skills and satisfaction with curriculum.

Results Response rate was 27.5% (166 of 604) of NYUSOM students. Many students reported they were not comfortable diagnosing eye emergencies (64%), using a direct ophthalmoscope (71%), or testing visual acuity (50%). The majority of students did not want ophthalmology to become a mandatory rotation, but reported additional in-person training would be most helpful, compared with videos, web-based didactics, lectures, or virtual training. Completion of an ophthalmology elective and more hours of ophthalmology training were associated with increased confidence with eye examination and greater satisfaction with the curriculum.

Conclusions It is critical for all physicians-in-training to have adequate skills in eye examination. Identifying areas of improvement and determining the best teaching modality will be important in updating the ophthalmology curriculum for medical students. The majority of medical students are not at all or only slightly confident with eye examinations. Increasing the amount of in-person ophthalmology training in medical school improves confidence with eye examination.

Keywords

medical school - education - ophthalmology - curriculum

• References

• 1 Quillen DA, Harper RA, Haik BG. Medical student education in ophthalmology: crisis and opportunity. Ophthalmology 2005; 112 (11) 1867-1868
• 2 Shah M, Knoch D, Waxman E. The state of ophthalmology medical student education in the United States and Canada, 2012 through 2013. Ophthalmology 2014; 121 (06) 1160-1163
• 3 Chan TY, Rai AS, Lee E, Glicksman JT, Hutnik CM. Needs assessment of ophthalmology education for primary care physicians in training: comparison with the International Council of Ophthalmology recommendations. Clin Ophthalmol 2011; 5: 311-319
• 4 Esparaz ES, Binder SB, Borges NJ. How prepared are medical students to diagnose and manage common ocular conditions. J Educ Eval Health Prof 2014; 11: 29
• 5 Lippa LM, Boker J, Duke A, Amin A. A novel 3-year longitudinal pilot study of medical students' acquisition and retention of screening eye examination skills. Ophthalmology 2006; 113 (01) 133-139
• 6 Stern GA. ; The Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology Education Committee. Teaching ophthalmology to primary care physicians. Arch Ophthalmol 1995; 113 (06) 722-724
• 7 Yusuf IH, Salmon JF, Patel CK. Direct ophthalmoscopy should be taught to undergraduate medical students-yes. Eye (Lond) 2015; 29 (08) 987-989
• 8 Sussman EJ, Tsiaras WG, Soper KA. Diagnosis of diabetic eye disease. JAMA 1982; 247 (23) 3231-3234
• 9 Levin AV, Christian CW. ; Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect, Section on Ophthalmology. The eye examination in the evaluation of child abuse. Pediatrics 2010; 126 (02) 376-380
• 10 Wu DJ, Greenberg PB. A self-directed preclinical course in ophthalmic surgery. J Surg Educ 2016; 73 (03) 370-374
• 11 Gupta RR, Lam W-C. Medical students' self-confidence in performing direct ophthalmoscopy in clinical training. Can J Ophthalmol 2006; 41 (02) 169-174
• 12 Clarkson JG. Training in ophthalmology is critical for all physicians. Arch Ophthalmol 2003; 121 (09) 1327
• 13 Lockwood JH, Sabharwal RK, Danoff D, Whitcomb ME. Quality improvement in medical students' education: the AAMC medical school graduation questionnaire. Med Educ 2004; 38 (03) 234-236
• 14 Pugnaire MP, Purwono U, Zanetti ML, Carlin MM. Tracking the longitudinal stability of medical students' perceptions using the AAMC graduation questionnaire and serial evaluation surveys. Acad Med 2004; 79 (10, Suppl): S32-S35
• 15 Ulman CA, Binder SB, Borges NJ. Assessment of medical students' proficiency in dermatology: Are medical students adequately prepared to diagnose and treat common dermatologic conditions in the United States?. J Educ Eval Health Prof 2015; 12: 18
• 16 Slavin SJ, Schindler DL, Chibnall JT. Medical student mental health 3.0: improving student wellness through curricular changes. Acad Med 2014; 89 (04) 573-577
• 17 Kuan EC, Badran KW, Passy V, Armstrong WB. Medical students' comfort levels with performing the basic head and neck examination in practice: follow-up during the core clerkship year. J Surg Educ 2015; 72 (01) 117-121
• 18 Day CS, Yeh AC, Franko O, Ramirez M, Krupat E. Musculoskeletal medicine: an assessment of the attitudes and knowledge of medical students at Harvard Medical School. Acad Med 2007; 82 (05) 452-457
• 19 Kleinberg TT, Kaushal S, Asdourian G. Ophthalmology Education in Medical School Curriculum Design: Assessing the Home Front. 2010. Available at: http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/ssp/106/ . Accessed November 13, 2016
• 20 Gogate P, Deshpande M, Dharmadhikari S. Which is the best method to learn ophthalmology? Resident doctors' perspective of ophthalmology training. Indian J Ophthalmol 2008; 56 (05) 409-412