Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1669952
Comparison of Knee Kinematics and Kinetics during Stair Ascent in Single-Radius and Multiradius Total Knee Arthroplasty
Publication History
29 June 2018
27 July 2018
Publication Date:
18 September 2018 (online)
Abstract
Traditionally total knee arthroplasty (TKA) design has been based on theories of the movement of the healthy knee joint. Currently, there are two competing theories on the flexion/extension axis of rotation of the knee with disparate radii of rotation, and thus differing movement patterns. The purpose of our study was to compare stair ascent kinematics and kinetics of single-radius (SR) and multiradius (MR) TKA subjects. We hypothesized that the knee kinematics and kinetics of SR TKA patients would more closely replicate healthy age matched controls during stair ascent than MR TKA patients, 1 year after TKA. Both patient groups had large improvements in biomechanical and clinical outcome measures following surgical intervention. However, the SR knee design performs closer to healthy controls than MR knees during stair ascent, supporting results that have been previously obtained for level walking. SR TKA subjects demonstrated reduced power production and sagittal moment compared with controls, albeit more than MR TKA subjects. This study demonstrates that patients who receive SR TKA have kinematics more closely aligned to normal patterns postoperatively than those who received an MR TKA. The power production and sagittal moment of the healthy controls most closely match previously published values of younger adults, SR TKA group most closely matches older adults, while the MR TKA group has lower power production and sagittal moments than either previously published age group. This strongly suggests that the biomechanical differences found in this study are evidence of functional deficiencies. Further research is needed to determine how these deficiencies progress with patient aging.
-
References
- 1 Gunaratne R, Pratt DN, Banda J, Fick DP, Khan RJK, Robertson BW. Patient dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (12) 3854-3860
- 2 Scott CE, Oliver WM, MacDonald D, Wade FA, Moran M, Breusch SJ. Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty in patients under 55 years of age. Bone Joint J 2016; 98-B (12) 1625-1634
- 3 Williams DP, O'Brien S, Doran E. , et al. Early postoperative predictors of satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2013; 20 (06) 442-446
- 4 Cook LE, Klika AK, Szubski CR, Rosneck J, Molloy R, Barsoum WK. Functional outcomes used to compare single radius and multiradius of curvature designs in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2012; 25 (03) 249-253
- 5 Larsen B, Jacofsky MC, Jacofsky DJ. Quantitative, comparative assessment of gait between single-radius and multi-radius total knee arthroplasty designs. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (06) 1062-1067
- 6 Mahoney OM, McClung CD, dela Rosa MA, Schmalzried TP. The effect of total knee arthroplasty design on extensor mechanism function. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17 (04) 416-421
- 7 Liu S, Long H, Zhang Y, Ma B, Li Z. Meta-analysis of outcomes of a single-radius versus multi-radius femoral design in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (03) 646-654
- 8 Ostermeier S, Hurschler C, Stukenborg-Colsman C. Quadriceps function after TKA--an in vitro study in a knee kinematic simulator. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2004; 19 (03) 270-276
- 9 Gómez-Barrena E, Fernandez-García C, Fernandez-Bravo A, Cutillas-Ruiz R, Bermejo-Fernandez G. Functional performance with a single-radius femoral design total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468 (05) 1214-1220
- 10 Hamilton DF, Burnett R, Patton JT. , et al. Implant design influences patient outcome after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B (01) 64-70
- 11 Wang H, Simpson KJ, Chamnongkich S, Kinsey T, Mahoney OM. A biomechanical comparison between the single-axis and multi-axis total knee arthroplasty systems for the stand-to-sit movement. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2005; 20 (04) 428-433
- 12 Wang H, Simpson KJ, Ferrara MS, Chamnongkich S, Kinsey T, Mahoney OM. Biomechanical differences exhibited during sit-to-stand between total knee arthroplasty designs of varying radii. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21 (08) 1193-1199
- 13 Andriacchi TP, Andersson GB, Fermier RW, Stern D, Galante JO. A study of lower-limb mechanics during stair-climbing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980; 62 (05) 749-757
- 14 Andriacchi TP, Galante JO, Fermier RW. The influence of total knee-replacement design on walking and stair-climbing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982; 64 (09) 1328-1335
- 15 Startzell JK, Owens DA, Mulfinger LM, Cavanagh PR. Stair negotiation in older people: a review. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000; 48 (05) 567-580
- 16 McAndrew Young PM, Dingwell JB. Voluntary changes in step width and step length during human walking affect dynamic margins of stability. Gait Posture 2012; 36 (02) 219-224
- 17 Kadaba MP, Ramakrishnan HK, Wootten ME. Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking. J Orthop Res 1990; 8 (03) 383-392
- 18 Reeves ND, Spanjaard M, Mohagheghi AA, Baltzopoulos V, Maganaris CN. Influence of light handrail use on the biomechanics of stair negotiation in old age. Gait Posture 2008; 28 (02) 327-336
- 19 Varnell MS, Bhowmik-Stoker M, McCamley J, Jacofsky MC, Campbell M, Jacofsky D. Difference in stair negotiation ability based on TKA surgical approach. J Knee Surg 2011; 24 (02) 117-123
- 20 Saleh KJ, Mulhall KJ, Bershadsky B. , et al. Development and validation of a lower-extremity activity scale. Use for patients treated with revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87 (09) 1985-1994
- 21 Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; (248) 13-14
- 22 R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2015
- 23 Riener R, Rabuffetti M, Frigo C. Stair ascent and descent at different inclinations. Gait Posture 2002; 15 (01) 32-44
- 24 Wilken JM, Sinitski EH, Bagg EA. The role of lower extremity joint powers in successful stair ambulation. Gait Posture 2011; 34 (01) 142-144
- 25 Nadeau S, McFadyen BJ, Malouin F. Frontal and sagittal plane analyses of the stair climbing task in healthy adults aged over 40 years: what are the challenges compared to level walking?. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2003; 18 (10) 950-959
- 26 Novak AC, Brouwer B. Sagittal and frontal lower limb joint moments during stair ascent and descent in young and older adults. Gait Posture 2011; 33 (01) 54-60
- 27 Reeves ND, Spanjaard M, Mohagheghi AA, Baltzopoulos V, Maganaris CN. Older adults employ alternative strategies to operate within their maximum capabilities when ascending stairs. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2009; 19 (02) e57-e68