Download PDF
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2018; 22(05): 528-539
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1673385
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Leveraging Technology to Improve Radiology Workflow

Vishal Desai
1   Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Adam Flanders
1   Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Adam C. Zoga
1   Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
06 November 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Although advancements in the last decade have automated much of the radiology workflow, there are several areas in the complex imaging process where standardization and innovation can be implemented. We discuss multiple tools and integrations that can help improve operational efficiency, quality, and safety.

Keywords

communication - technology - workflow - value - imaging
 

  • References

  • 1 Dickerson EC, Alam HB, Brown RKJ, Stojanovska J, Davenport MS. ; Michigan Radiology Quality Collaborative. In-person communication between radiologists and acute care surgeons leads to significant alterations in surgical decision making. J Am Coll Radiol 2016; 13 (08) 943-949
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Nitrosi A, Bertolini M, Sghedoni R. , et al. RIS-PACS, patient safety, and clinical risk management. Radiol Med (Torino) 2015; 120 (06) 498-503
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kovacs MD, Cho MY, Burchett PF, Trambert M. Benefits of integrated RIS/PACS/Reporting due to automatic population of templated reports. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2018; January 6 (Epub ahead of print)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Khorasani R. Clinical decision support in radiology: what is it, why do we need it, and what key features make it effective?. J Am Coll Radiol 2006; 3 (02) 142-143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 American College of Radiology. Clinical decision support. Available at: https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Clinical-Decision-Support
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Clinical decision support mechanism. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/Appropriate-Use-Criteria-Program/CDSM.html . Accessed May 9, 2018
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Huber TC, Krishnaraj A, Patrie J, Gaskin CM. Impact of a commercially available clinical decision support program on provider ordering habits. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 15 (07) 951-957
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Mills AM, Ip IK, Langlotz CP, Raja AS, Zafar HM, Khorasani R. Clinical decision support increases diagnostic yield of computed tomography for suspected pulmonary embolism. Am J Emerg Med 2018; 36 (04) 540-544
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Raja AS, Ip IK, Prevedello LM. , et al. Effect of computerized clinical decision support on the use and yield of CT pulmonary angiography in the emergency department. Radiology 2012; 262 (02) 468-474
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Tajmir S, Raja AS, Ip IK. , et al. Impact of clinical decision support on radiography for acute ankle injuries: a randomized trial. West J Emerg Med 2017; 18 (03) 487-495
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Blackmore CC, Mecklenburg RS, Kaplan GS. Effectiveness of clinical decision support in controlling inappropriate imaging. J Am Coll Radiol 2011; 8 (01) 19-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Moriarity AK, Klochko C, O'Brien M, Halabi S. The effect of clinical decision support for advanced inpatient imaging. J Am Coll Radiol 2015; 12 (04) 358-363
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Bookman K, West D, Ginde A. , et al. Embedded clinical decision support in electronic health record decreases use of high-cost imaging in the emergency department: EmbED study. Acad Emerg Med 2017; 24 (07) 839-845
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Morgan MB, Branstetter IV BF, Clark C, House J, Baker D, Harnsberger HR. Just-in-time radiologist decision support: the importance of PACS-integrated workflow. J Am Coll Radiol 2011; 8 (07) 497-500
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Boonn WW, Langlotz CP. Radiologist use of and perceived need for patient data access. J Digit Imaging 2009; 22 (04) 357-362
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Sharpe Jr RE, Surrey D, Gorniak RJT, Nazarian L, Rao VM, Flanders AE. Radiology Report Comparator: a novel method to augment resident education. J Digit Imaging 2012; 25 (03) 330-336
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Gorniak RJT, Flanders AE, Sharpe Jr RE. Trainee report dashboard: tool for enhancing feedback to radiology trainees about their reports. Radiographics 2013; 33 (07) 2105-2113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Harari AA, Conti MB, Bokhari SAJ, Staib LH, Taylor CR. The role of report comparison, analysis, and discrepancy categorization in resident education. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016; 207 (06) 1223-1231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Surrey D, Sharpe Jr RE, Gorniak RJT, Nazarian LN, Rao VM, Flanders AE. QRSE: a novel metric for the evaluation of trainee radiologist reporting skills. J Digit Imaging 2013; 26 (04) 678-682
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Mahgerefteh S, Kruskal JB, Yam CS, Blachar A, Sosna J. Peer review in diagnostic radiology: current state and a vision for the future. Radiographics 2009; 29 (05) 1221-1231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kaewlai R, Abujudeh H. Peer review in clinical radiology practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199 (02) W158–62
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Flanders AE, Sharpe RE, Roth CG, Flanders A, Sharpe R, Merritt C. Peer-to-Peer: an Integrated PACS based solution for improving compliance with the radiology peer review process. Available at: https://www.rsna.org/uploadedFiles/RSNA/Content/Science/Quality/Storyboards/2012/Flanders.pdf . Accessed September 28, 2018
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 American College of Radiology. RADPEER. Available at: https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/RADPEER . Accessed July 9, 2018
    PubMed
  • 24 Filice R. Who you gonna call? Automatically connecting radiologists to the right clinician. J Digit Imaging 2017; 30 (05) 595-601
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Nuance Communications. Primordial. Available at: http://engage.nuance.com/primordial . Accessed July 9, 2018
    PubMed
  • 26 Gunn AJ, Mangano MD, Choy G, Sahani DV. Rethinking the role of the radiologist: enhancing visibility through both traditional and nontraditional reporting practices. Radiographics 2015; 35 (02) 416-423
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Bosmans JML, Peremans L, De Schepper AM, Duyck PO, Parizel PM. How do referring clinicians want radiologists to report? Suggestions from the COVER survey. Insights Imaging 2011; 2 (05) 577-584
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Balint BJ, Steenburg SD, Lin H, Shen C, Steele JL, Gunderman RB. Do telephone call interruptions have an impact on radiology resident diagnostic accuracy?. Acad Radiol 2014; 21 (12) 1623-1628
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Watura C, Blunt D, Amiras D. Ring! Characterising telephone interruptions during radiology reporting and how to reduce these. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2018; January 11 (Epub ahead of print)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Desai V, Deshmukh S, Roth C. Web/Mobile apps improve radiology communication. Paper presented at: American Roentgen Ray Society; April 17–22, 2016; Los Angeles, CA
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Dashevsky B, Gorovoy M, Weadock WJ, Juluru K. Radiology teaching files: an assessment of their role and desired features based on a national survey. J Digit Imaging 2015; 28 (04) 389-398
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Radiological Society of North America Medical Imaging Resource Community Available at: https://www.rsna.org/MIRC.aspx . Accessed July 9, 2018
    PubMed
  • 33 Kruskal JB, Eisenberg R, Sosna J, Yam CS, Kruskal JD, Boiselle PM. Quality initiatives: quality improvement in radiology: basic principles and tools required to achieve success. Radiographics 2011; 31 (06) 1499-1509
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Trello. Available at: https://trello.com/ . Accessed July 9, 2018
    PubMed
  • 35 Asana. Available at: https://asana.com/welcome?utm_expid=.O7ONgeBRQr65MgeeutQ_6g.1&utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F . Accessed July 9, 2018
    PubMed
  • 36 Taiga.io. Available at: https://taiga.io/ . Accessed July 9, 2018
    PubMed
  • 37 Wekan—open-source kanban. Available at: https://wekan.github.io/ . Accessed July 9, 2018
    PubMed
  • 38 Jira issue & project tracking software. Atlassian. Available at: https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira . Accessed July 9, 2018
    PubMed
  • 39 Faulkner X, Culwin F. When fingers do the talking: a study of text messaging. Interact Comput 2005; 17 (02) 167-185
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Lenhart A, Ling R, Campell S, Purcell K. Teens and mobile phones: text messaging explodes as teens embrace it as the centerpiece of their communication strategies with friends. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/2010/04/20/teens-and-mobile-phones . Accessed September 28, 2018
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Hall AK, Cole-Lewis H, Bernhardt JM. Mobile text messaging for health: a systematic review of reviews. Annu Rev Public Health 2015; 36 (01) 393-415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar