Leveraging Technology to Improve Radiology Workflow

Abstract

Although advancements in the last decade have automated much of the radiology workflow, there are several areas in the complex imaging process where standardization and innovation can be implemented. We discuss multiple tools and integrations that can help improve operational efficiency, quality, and safety.

Keywords

communication - technology - workflow - value - imaging

• References

• 1 Dickerson EC, Alam HB, Brown RKJ, Stojanovska J, Davenport MS. ; Michigan Radiology Quality Collaborative. In-person communication between radiologists and acute care surgeons leads to significant alterations in surgical decision making. J Am Coll Radiol 2016; 13 (08) 943-949
• 2 Nitrosi A, Bertolini M, Sghedoni R. , et al. RIS-PACS, patient safety, and clinical risk management. Radiol Med (Torino) 2015; 120 (06) 498-503
• 3 Kovacs MD, Cho MY, Burchett PF, Trambert M. Benefits of integrated RIS/PACS/Reporting due to automatic population of templated reports. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2018; January 6 (Epub ahead of print)
• 4 Khorasani R. Clinical decision support in radiology: what is it, why do we need it, and what key features make it effective?. J Am Coll Radiol 2006; 3 (02) 142-143
• 5 American College of Radiology. Clinical decision support. Available at: https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Clinical-Decision-Support
• 6 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Clinical decision support mechanism. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/Appropriate-Use-Criteria-Program/CDSM.html . Accessed May 9, 2018
• 7 Huber TC, Krishnaraj A, Patrie J, Gaskin CM. Impact of a commercially available clinical decision support program on provider ordering habits. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 15 (07) 951-957
• 8 Mills AM, Ip IK, Langlotz CP, Raja AS, Zafar HM, Khorasani R. Clinical decision support increases diagnostic yield of computed tomography for suspected pulmonary embolism. Am J Emerg Med 2018; 36 (04) 540-544
• 9 Raja AS, Ip IK, Prevedello LM. , et al. Effect of computerized clinical decision support on the use and yield of CT pulmonary angiography in the emergency department. Radiology 2012; 262 (02) 468-474
• 10 Tajmir S, Raja AS, Ip IK. , et al. Impact of clinical decision support on radiography for acute ankle injuries: a randomized trial. West J Emerg Med 2017; 18 (03) 487-495
• 11 Blackmore CC, Mecklenburg RS, Kaplan GS. Effectiveness of clinical decision support in controlling inappropriate imaging. J Am Coll Radiol 2011; 8 (01) 19-25
• 12 Moriarity AK, Klochko C, O'Brien M, Halabi S. The effect of clinical decision support for advanced inpatient imaging. J Am Coll Radiol 2015; 12 (04) 358-363
• 13 Bookman K, West D, Ginde A. , et al. Embedded clinical decision support in electronic health record decreases use of high-cost imaging in the emergency department: EmbED study. Acad Emerg Med 2017; 24 (07) 839-845
• 14 Morgan MB, Branstetter IV BF, Clark C, House J, Baker D, Harnsberger HR. Just-in-time radiologist decision support: the importance of PACS-integrated workflow. J Am Coll Radiol 2011; 8 (07) 497-500
• 15 Boonn WW, Langlotz CP. Radiologist use of and perceived need for patient data access. J Digit Imaging 2009; 22 (04) 357-362
• 16 Sharpe Jr RE, Surrey D, Gorniak RJT, Nazarian L, Rao VM, Flanders AE. Radiology Report Comparator: a novel method to augment resident education. J Digit Imaging 2012; 25 (03) 330-336
• 17 Gorniak RJT, Flanders AE, Sharpe Jr RE. Trainee report dashboard: tool for enhancing feedback to radiology trainees about their reports. Radiographics 2013; 33 (07) 2105-2113
• 18 Harari AA, Conti MB, Bokhari SAJ, Staib LH, Taylor CR. The role of report comparison, analysis, and discrepancy categorization in resident education. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016; 207 (06) 1223-1231
• 19 Surrey D, Sharpe Jr RE, Gorniak RJT, Nazarian LN, Rao VM, Flanders AE. QRSE: a novel metric for the evaluation of trainee radiologist reporting skills. J Digit Imaging 2013; 26 (04) 678-682
• 20 Mahgerefteh S, Kruskal JB, Yam CS, Blachar A, Sosna J. Peer review in diagnostic radiology: current state and a vision for the future. Radiographics 2009; 29 (05) 1221-1231
• 21 Kaewlai R, Abujudeh H. Peer review in clinical radiology practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199 (02) W158–62
• 22 Flanders AE, Sharpe RE, Roth CG, Flanders A, Sharpe R, Merritt C. Peer-to-Peer: an Integrated PACS based solution for improving compliance with the radiology peer review process. Available at: https://www.rsna.org/uploadedFiles/RSNA/Content/Science/Quality/Storyboards/2012/Flanders.pdf . Accessed September 28, 2018
• 23 American College of Radiology. RADPEER. Available at: https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/RADPEER . Accessed July 9, 2018
• 24 Filice R. Who you gonna call? Automatically connecting radiologists to the right clinician. J Digit Imaging 2017; 30 (05) 595-601
• 25 Nuance Communications. Primordial. Available at: http://engage.nuance.com/primordial . Accessed July 9, 2018
• 26 Gunn AJ, Mangano MD, Choy G, Sahani DV. Rethinking the role of the radiologist: enhancing visibility through both traditional and nontraditional reporting practices. Radiographics 2015; 35 (02) 416-423
• 27 Bosmans JML, Peremans L, De Schepper AM, Duyck PO, Parizel PM. How do referring clinicians want radiologists to report? Suggestions from the COVER survey. Insights Imaging 2011; 2 (05) 577-584
• 28 Balint BJ, Steenburg SD, Lin H, Shen C, Steele JL, Gunderman RB. Do telephone call interruptions have an impact on radiology resident diagnostic accuracy?. Acad Radiol 2014; 21 (12) 1623-1628
• 29 Watura C, Blunt D, Amiras D. Ring! Characterising telephone interruptions during radiology reporting and how to reduce these. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2018; January 11 (Epub ahead of print)
• 30 Desai V, Deshmukh S, Roth C. Web/Mobile apps improve radiology communication. Paper presented at: American Roentgen Ray Society; April 17–22, 2016; Los Angeles, CA
• 31 Dashevsky B, Gorovoy M, Weadock WJ, Juluru K. Radiology teaching files: an assessment of their role and desired features based on a national survey. J Digit Imaging 2015; 28 (04) 389-398
• 32 Radiological Society of North America Medical Imaging Resource Community Available at: https://www.rsna.org/MIRC.aspx . Accessed July 9, 2018
• 33 Kruskal JB, Eisenberg R, Sosna J, Yam CS, Kruskal JD, Boiselle PM. Quality initiatives: quality improvement in radiology: basic principles and tools required to achieve success. Radiographics 2011; 31 (06) 1499-1509
• 34 Trello. Available at: https://trello.com/ . Accessed July 9, 2018
• 35 Asana. Available at: https://asana.com/welcome?utm_expid=.O7ONgeBRQr65MgeeutQ_6g.1&utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F . Accessed July 9, 2018
• 36 Taiga.io. Available at: https://taiga.io/ . Accessed July 9, 2018
• 37 Wekan—open-source kanban. Available at: https://wekan.github.io/ . Accessed July 9, 2018
• 38 Jira issue & project tracking software. Atlassian. Available at: https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira . Accessed July 9, 2018
• 39 Faulkner X, Culwin F. When fingers do the talking: a study of text messaging. Interact Comput 2005; 17 (02) 167-185
• 40 Lenhart A, Ling R, Campell S, Purcell K. Teens and mobile phones: text messaging explodes as teens embrace it as the centerpiece of their communication strategies with friends. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/2010/04/20/teens-and-mobile-phones . Accessed September 28, 2018
• 41 Hall AK, Cole-Lewis H, Bernhardt JM. Mobile text messaging for health: a systematic review of reviews. Annu Rev Public Health 2015; 36 (01) 393-415