CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Academic Ophthalmology 2018; 10(01): e185-e188
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1676856
Research Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

The Relative Financial Cost and Benefit of an Ophthalmology Resident Compared to an Advanced Practice Provider, Optometrist, or Faculty Ophthalmologist

Daniel B. Moore
1   Department of Ophthalmology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
,
William Barr
2   Department of Finance, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

07 July 2018

20 November 2018

Publication Date:
28 December 2018 (online)

Abstract

Objective The main objective of the article is to determine the relative direct financial cost and benefit of an advanced practice provider (APP), optometrist, and faculty ophthalmologist compared with an ophthalmology resident.

Design Single center cost–benefit financial analysis.

Methods The direct total expenses, including mean salary and benefits; the cost/week, based upon calculated hours worked; and net revenue, based upon technical collections subtracted from total expenses were collected for all APPs, optometrists, faculty ophthalmologists, and ophthalmology residents at the University of Kentucky for the 2016 to 2017 academic year. Optometry and ophthalmology faculty collections were adjusted for clinical full-time equivalents.

Results Total annual mean salary and benefits for 242 APPs, 4 optometrists, 17 faculty ophthalmologists, and 9 ophthalmology residents were $126,797, $117,021, $338,233, and $71,210, respectively. Assuming a 50-hour-work week, the calculated hourly costs were $48.77, $45.01, $130.09, and $27.39, respectively. Ophthalmology residents do not directly generate work relative value units or collections. On this basis, the net annual revenues were −$62,729, $122,757, $566,119, and −$71,210, respectively.

Conclusions Ophthalmology residents are relatively inexpensive compared with potential substitute health care providers, although they are unable to generate direct revenue. Indirect costs and benefits are likely substantial, but currently incalculable. More candid analyses of the role and financial impact of trainees in health care are needed.

 
  • References

  • 1 Schuster BL. Funding of Graduate Medical Education in a market-based healthcare system. Am J Med Sci 2017; 353 (02) 119-125
  • 2 Rich EC, Liebow M, Srinivasan M. , et al. Medicare financing of graduate medical education. J Gen Intern Med 2002; 17 (04) 283-292
  • 3 Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Report to the Congress: aligning incentives in Medicare. June 2010. Available at: http://www.medpac.gov/docs/default-source/congressional-testimony/20100623_EandC_Testimony_AligningIncentivesinMedicare.pdf?sfvrsn=0 . Accessed October 26, 2017
  • 4 The National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform. The moment of truth. December 2010. Available at: http://www.momentoftruthproject.org/sites/default/files/TheMomentofTruth12_1_2010.pdf . Accessed October 26, 2017
  • 5 Institute of Medicine. Graduate Medical Education that Meets the Nation's Health Needs. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2014
  • 6 Riaz M, Palermo T, Yen M, Edelman NH. The projected response of residency-sponsoring institutions to a reduction in Medicare support for graduate medical education: a national survey. Acad Med 2015; 90 (10) 1380-1385
  • 7 Wynn BO, Smalley R, Cordasco KM. Does it cost more to train residents or to replace them?: A look at the costs and benefits of operating graduate medical education programs. Rand Health Q 2013; 3 (03) 7 eCollection.
  • 8 DeMarco DM, Forster R, Gakis T, Finberg RW. Eliminating residents increases the cost of care. J Grad Med Educ 2017; 9 (04) 514-517
  • 9 Stephenson M. Is there a place for PAs in ophthalmology?. Rev Ophthalmol 2015; 13: 52-58
  • 10 Browning DJ. Physician assistants and nurse practitioners in ophthalmology – has the time come?. Am J Ophthalmol 2018; 186: ix-xi
  • 11 Lee B, D'Souza M, Singman EL. , et al. Integration of a physician assistant into an ophthalmology consult service in an academic setting. Am J Ophthalmol 2018; 190: 125-133 ; Epub ahead of print
  • 12 Sklar DP. Graduate Medical Education and the institute of medicine report. Acad Med 2014; 89 (12) 1575-1577
  • 13 Stoller J, Pratt S, Stanek S, Zelenock G, Nazzal M. Financial contribution of residents when billing as “junior associates” in the “surgical firm”. J Surg Educ 2016; 73 (01) 85-94
  • 14 Feinstein AJ, Deckelbaum DL, Madan AK, McKenney MG. Unsupervised procedures by surgical trainees: a windfall for private insurance at the expense of graduate medical education. J Trauma 2011; 70 (01) 136-139 , discussion 139–140
  • 15 Jackson III JB, Vincent S, Davies J. , et al. A prospective multicenter evaluation of the value of the on-call orthopedic resident. J Grad Med Educ 2018; 10 (01) 91-94
  • 16 Committee on the Governance and Financing of Graduate Medical Education; Board on Health Care Services. Institute of Medicine; Eden J, Berwick D, Wilensky G, editors. Graduate medical education that meets the nation's health needs. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2014
  • 17 Stoff BK, MacKelfresh JB, Stoddard HA. Education versus service in residency: a false dichotomy?. J Grad Med Educ 2017; 9 (03) 395-396