Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000051.xml
Semin Plast Surg 2019; 33(02): 114-119
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1685478
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1685478
Review Article
Orbitocranial Approaches to the Skull Base
Further Information
Publication History
Publication Date:
26 April 2019 (online)
Abstract
There are a myriad of approaches and surgical options for removal and treatment of skull base diseases. While, historically, large open approaches have been preferred, several endoscopic and minimally invasive techniques are now available that preserve intraoperative visualization and surgical success while minimizing morbidity and recovery times. Herein, the authors review common open, minimally invasive, and endoscopic approaches to the anterior skull base.
-
References
- 1 Perkins EL, Brandon BM, Sreenath SB. , et al. Transfacial and craniofacial approaches for resection of sinonasal and ventral skull base malignancies. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2017; 50 (02) 287-300
- 2 Kim SR, Lee JW, Han YS, Kim HK. Transfacial surgical approaches to secure wide exposure of the skull base. Arch Craniofac Surg 2015; 16 (01) 17-23
- 3 Feiz-Erfan I, Spetzler RF, Horn EM. , et al. Proposed classification for the transbasal approach and its modifications. Skull Base 2008; 18 (01) 29-47
- 4 Soleman J, Leiggener C, Schlaeppi AJ, Kienzler J, Fathi AR, Fandino J. The extended subfrontal and fronto-orbito-zygomatic approach in skull base meningioma surgery: clinical, radiologic, and cosmetic outcome. J Craniofac Surg 2016; 27 (02) 433-440
- 5 El-Bahy K. Validity of the frontolateral approach as a minimally invasive corridor for olfactory groove meningiomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2009; 151 (10) 1197-1205
- 6 Pontius AT, Ducic Y. Extended orbitozygomatic approach to the skull base to improve access to the cavernous sinus and optic chiasm. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130 (05) 519-525
- 7 Jane JA, Park TS, Pobereskin LH, Winn HR, Butler AB. The supraorbital approach: technical note. Neurosurgery 1982; 11 (04) 537-542
- 8 Fujitsu K, Kuwabara T. Zygomatic approach for lesions in the interpeduncular cistern. J Neurosurg 1985; 62 (03) 340-343
- 9 Zada G, Du R, Laws Jr ER. Defining the “edge of the envelope”: patient selection in treating complex sellar-based neoplasms via transsphenoidal versus open craniotomy. J Neurosurg 2011; 114 (02) 286-300
- 10 Raveh J. Modified frontobasal approach. Chirurgie 1983; 54: 677-686
- 11 Ducic Y, Coimbra C. Minimally invasive transfrontal sinus approach to resection of large tumors of the subfrontal skull base. Laryngoscope 2011; 121 (11) 2290-2294
- 12 Barzo P, Zador Z, Bodosi M. , et al. Combined minimally invasive supraciliary and transfacial approach for large tumors with skull base and sinonasal involvement. World Neurosurg 2018; 109: 1-9
- 13 Paluzzi A, Gardner P, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Snyderman C. The expanding role of endoscopic skull base surgery. Br J Neurosurg 2012; 26 (05) 649-661
- 14 Locatelli D, Pozzi F, Turri-Zanoni M. , et al. Transorbital endoscopic approaches to the skull base: current concepts and future perspectives. J Neurosurg Sci 2016; 60 (04) 514-525
- 15 Moe KS, Kim LJ, Bergeron CM. Transorbital endoscopic repair of cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Laryngoscope 2011; 121 (01) 13-30
- 16 Moe KS, Bergeron CM, Ellenbogen RG. Transorbital neuroendoscopic surgery. Neurosurgery 2010; 67 (3, Suppl Operative): ons16-ons28
- 17 Sonig A, Nanda A. Transorbital approach to the anterior cranial skull base. World Neurosurg 2013; 80 (06) 810-812
- 18 Moe KS. The precaruncular approach to the medial orbit. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003; 5 (06) 483-487
- 19 Dallan I, Castelnuovo P, Locatelli D. , et al. Multiportal combined transorbital transnasal endoscopic approach for the management of selected skull base lesions: preliminary experience. World Neurosurg 2015; 84 (01) 97-107
- 20 Ganly I, Patel SG, Singh B. , et al. Complications of craniofacial resection for malignant tumors of the skull base: report of an International Collaborative Study. Head Neck 2005; 27 (06) 445-451
- 21 Irish JC, Gullane PJ, Gentili F. , et al. Tumors of the skull base: outcome and survival analysis of 77 cases. Head Neck 1994; 16 (01) 3-10
- 22 Wornom III IL, Neifeld JP, Mehrhof Jr AI, Young HF, Chinchilli VM. Closure of craniofacial defects after cancer resection. Am J Surg 1991; 162 (04) 408-411
- 23 Miller JD, Taylor RJ, Ambrose EC, Laux JP, Ebert CS, Zanation AM. Complications of open approaches to the skull base in the endoscopic era. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2017; 78 (01) 11-17
- 24 Devaiah AK, Andreoli MT. Treatment of esthesioneuroblastoma: a 16-year meta-analysis of 361 patients. Laryngoscope 2009; 119 (07) 1412-1416
- 25 Komotar RJ, Starke RM, Raper DM, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic endonasal compared with anterior craniofacial and combined cranionasal resection of esthesioneuroblastomas. World Neurosurg 2013; 80 (1–2): 148-159
- 26 Komotar RJ, Starke RM, Raper DMS, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic endonasal versus open transcranial resection of anterior midline skull base meningiomas. World Neurosurg 2012; 77 (5–6): 713-724
- 27 Shetty SR, Ruiz-Treviño AS, Omay SB. , et al. Limitations of the endonasal endoscopic approach in treating olfactory groove meningiomas. A systematic review. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2017; 159 (10) 1875-1885