Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1690772
Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Novel 2-Substituted Analogues of (–)-Pentenomycin I
A.K.H.H. gratefully acknowledges the European Research Council (ERC, Grant No. 757913), the Helmholtz-Association’s Initiative and Networking Fund, and the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (COFUND-ALERT, Grant No. 665250).Publication History
Received: 31 October 2019
Accepted after revision: 27 November 2019
Publication Date:
02 January 2020 (online)
Published as part of the Special Section 11th EuCheMS Organic Division Young Investigator Workshop
Abstract
A library of novel 2-substituted derivatives of the antibiotic natural product pentenomycin I is presented. The new collection of analogues is divided in two main classes, 2-alkynyl- and 2-aryl- derivatives, which are accessed by the appropriate type of palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reaction of the 2-iodo-protected pentenomycin I with suitable nucleophiles. The new derivatives were tested for their activity against certain types of bacteria and one of them, compound 8h, was found to exhibit significant inhibitory activity against several Gram-positive bacteria but also displayed cytotoxic activity against eukaryotic cell lines.
Supporting Information
- Supporting information for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1690772.
- Supporting Information
-
References and Notes
- 1a Umino K, Furumai T, Matsuzawa N, Awataguchi Y, Ito Y, Okuda T. J. Antibiot. 1973; 26: 506
- 1b Umino K, Takeda N, Ito Y, Okuda T. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1974; 22: 1233
- 2 Umino K, Yamaguchi T, Ito Y. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1974; 22: 2113
- 3 Christos Stathakis, Dissertation; Aristotle University of Thessaloniki: Greece, 2007.
- 4a Miller MW, Johnson CR. J. Org. Chem. 1997; 62: 1582
- 4b Negishi E. J. Organomet. Chem. 1999; 576: 179
- 4c Negishi E, Tan Z, Liou S.-Y, Liao B. Tetrahedron 2000; 56: 10197
- 4d Pohmakotr M, Kambutong S, Tuchinda P, Kuhakarn C. Tetrahedron 2008; 64: 6315
- 5a Gallos JK, Damianou KC, Dellios CC. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001; 42: 5769
- 5b Gallos JK, Stathakis CI, Kotoulas SS, Koumbis AE. J. Org. Chem. 2005; 70: 6884
- 6a Sonogashira K, Tohda Y, Hagihara N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975; 16: 4467
- 6b Sonogashira K. J. Organomet. Chem. 2002; 653: 46
- 7 Typical Procedure for the Sonogashira Coupling 2-Iodopentenomycin (7, 100 mg, 0.181 mmol, 1.0 equiv) was dissolved in THF (3.5 mL) and Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (8 mg, 0.011 mmol, 0.06 equiv) and CuI (10 mg, 0.05 mmol, 0.3 equiv) were added successively. The mixture was deoxygenated and flashed with argon carefully and then was cooled to 0 °C. 1-Decyne (65.3 μL, 0.362 mmol, 2.0 equiv) was added dropwise, followed by addition of i Pr2NH (0.13 mL, 0.905 mmol, 5 equiv). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h before it was diluted with EtOAc and acidified with 1 N HCl. The organic layer was separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with EtAOc (2 × 10 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4. The solvent was removed in vacuo, and the residue was purified by flash column chromatography (hexanes/EtOAc, 15:1) to afford the enone 10h (87mg) in 85% yield. Next, compound 10h was dissolved in a mixture 90% TFA/H2O (2.0 mL) at 0 °C, and the resulting solution was stirred for 90 min at this temperature. Upon completion of deprotection, as determined by TLC, volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in methanol and evaporated till dry. The above procedure was repeated twice. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography using EtOAc/MeOH (9:1) as the eluent to afford 8h as a yellow sticky oil (42 mg, 96% yield). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 7.53 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 1 H), 4.74 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.69 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.55 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.40 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2 H), 1.60–1.52 (m, 2 H), 1.43 (dq, J = 13.0, 6.7 Hz, 2 H), 1.34–1.29 (m, 8 H), 0.90 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 3 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 204.0, 161.3, 129.7, 98.7, 75.4, 70.4, 70.0, 63.0, 31.6, 28.9, 28.8, 28.5, 28.1, 22.3, 18.7, 13.0. FTIR (neat): 3462, 2913, 2234, 1738, 1492, 1245, 704 cm–1. [α]D 25 +13.6° (c 1.57 EtOH). HRMS (ESI): m/z [M – H]– calcd for C16H23O4: 279.1596; found: 279.1589.
- 8 Typical Procedure for the Suzuki Reaction 2-Iodopentenomycin (7, 100 mg, 0.181 mmol, 1.0 equiv) was dissolved in a mixture of THF (2.5 mL) and H2O (0.75 mL). Naphthalene-1-boronic acid (47 mg, 0.272 mmol, 1.5 equiv), Ag2O (67 mg, 0.29 mmol, 1.6 equiv), Ph3As (12 mg, 0.04 mmol, 0.2 equiv), and Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (7 mg, 0.018 mmol, 0.1 equiv) were added successively, and the reaction was stirred at ambient temperature for 3 h. Upon completion the mixture was filtered through Celite. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography (hexanes/EtOAc, 15:1) to afford the respective enone 12d (100 mg, 99% yield). Next, compound 12d was dissolved in a mixture of 90% TFA/H2O at 0 °C, and the resulting solution was stirred for 90 min at this temperature. When the reaction was completed as determined by TLC, volatiles were removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was dissolved in methanol and evaporated down. The above procedure was repeated twice, and the residue was purified by flash column chromatography using EtOAc/MeOH (9:1) as the eluent. Derivative 13d was afforded as brown solid (32 mg, 67% yield, mp 52–55 °C). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 7.89 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.82 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.69 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1 H), 7.49 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.46–7.43 (m, 1 H), 7.38 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1 H), 4.97 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.89 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.73 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, 1 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 205.7, 160.2, 144.7, 133.6, 131.2, 129.3, 128.6, 127.9, 126.5, 125.8, 125.6, 125.1, 124.7, 76.2, 70.3, 63.4. FTIR (neat): 3388, 2924, 2852, 1715, 1509, 1141, 778 cm–1. [α]D 25 –20.5° (c 1.46 EtOH). HRMS (ESI): m/z [M – H]– calcd for C16H13O4: 269.0814; found: 269.0819.
- 9a Ruel FS, Braun MP, Johnson WS. Org. Synth., Coll. Vol. X 2004; 467
- 9b Miyaura N, Suzuki A. Chem. Rev. 1995; 95: 2457
- 10 Kamishima T, Suzuki M, Aoyagi S, Watanabe T, Koseki Y, Kasai H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2019; 60: 1375
- 11 Antibacterial Testing Compounds were prepared as DMSO stock solutions, and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined as described in the literature.12 Bacteria were handled according to standard procedures and were obtained from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ) or were part of our internal strain collection. In brief, bacterial cultures were diluted in Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB; 1.7% peptone casein, 0.3% peptone soymeal, 0.25% glucose, 0.5% NaCl, 0.25% K2HPO4; pH 7.3; for Enterococci and Streptococci), Luria Broth (LB; 0.05% sodium chloride, 1.0% tryptone, and 0.5% yeast extract for S. aureus, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa), BBL Middlebrook 7H9 with glycerol (0.1% w/v casitone, 5.6 μg/mL palmitic acid, 5 mg/mL bovine serum albumin, 4 μg/mL catalase; for M. smegmatis), or Müller-Hinton broth (0.2% beef infusion solids, 1.75% casein hydrolysate, 0.15% starch; pH 7.4; for all other listed bacteria) to achieve a final inoculum of approximately 104 to 105 colony-forming units (cfu)/mL. Compounds were tested in serial dilution (0.06–128 μM) in 96-well plates, and MIC values were determined by visual inspection after 16–48 h incubation at 37 °C. MTT Assay HepG2 (human hepatocellular carcinoma), HEK293 (human embryonal kidney), and A549 (human lung carcinoma) cells (2 × 105 cells per well) were seeded in 24-well in flat-bottomed plates. Culturing of cells, incubations and OD measurements were performed as described previously with small modification.13 After seeding for 24 h, the incubation was started by the addition of compounds in a final DMSO concentration of 1%. The living cell mass was quantified after 48 h. Rifampicin was used as negative control, doxorubicin as positive control. Full experimental details for the synthesis of all pentenomycin derivatives, as well as pictures of 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra thereof are provided in the Supporting Information section.
- 12 Hüttel S, Testolin G, Herrmann J, Planke T, Gille F, Moreno M, Stadler M, Brönstrup M, Kirschning A, Müller R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017; 56: 12760
- 13 Haupenthal J, Baehr C, Zeuzem S, Piiper A. Int. J. Cancer 2007; 121: 206