Download PDF
Semin Plast Surg 2019; 33(03): 173-184
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1693019
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Acellular Dermal Matrices: Applications in Plastic Surgery

Shahryar Tork
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
,
Ryan C. Jefferson
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
,
Jeffrey E. Janis
2   Department of Plastic Surgery, University Hospitals, Wexner Medical Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 August 2019 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Modern advances in tissue engineering have transformed the plastic surgeon's management strategies across a wide variety of applications. Comprehension of the fundamentals of biologic constructs is critical to navigating the available armamentarium. It is essential that plastic surgeons become familiar with some of the existing methods for utilizing biologics as well as the advantages and limitations to their use. In this article, the authors describe the basic science of biologics with a focus on acellular dermal matrices (ADMs), and review the recent evidence behind their use for a variety of reconstructive and aesthetic purposes. The review is organized by system and examines the common indications, techniques, and outcomes pertaining to the application of ADMs in select anatomic areas. The final section briefly considers possible future directions for using biologics in plastic and reconstructive surgery.

Keywords

Biologics - acellular dermal matrix - plastic surgery - reconstructive surgery
 

  • References

  • 1 Banyard DA, Bourgeois JM, Widgerow AD, Evans GR. Regenerative biomaterials: a review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (06) 1740-1748
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Tenenhaus M, Rennekampff HO. Current concepts in tissue engineering: skin and wound. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (3, Suppl): 42S-50S
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Badylak SF. The extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2002; 13 (05) 377-383
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Wan D, Potter JK. Biomaterials. In: Janis JE. , ed. Essentials of Plastic Surgery. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2016: 87-104
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 5 Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ. The biology of biologics: basic science and clinical concepts. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (05) (Suppl. 02) 9S-17S
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Hughes OB, Rakosi A, Macquhae F, Herskovitz I, Fox JD, Kirsner RS. A review of cellular and acellular matrix products: indications, techniques, and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (3, Suppl): 138S-147S
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 DeGeorge Jr BR, Ning B, Salopek LS. , et al. Advanced imaging techniques for investigation of acellular dermal matrix biointegration. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (02) 395-405
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Dunn RM. Cross-linking in biomaterials: a primer for clinicians. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (05) (Suppl. 02) 18S-26S
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Osoria H, Jacoby A, Hooper RC. , et al. Perforation of acellular dermal matrices increases the rate of cellular invasion. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (04) (Suppl. 01) 26
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Mendenhall SD, Schmucker RW, Daugherty THF. , et al. A microbiological and ultrastructural comparison of aseptic versus sterile acellular dermal matrix as a reconstructive material and a scaffold for stem cell ingrowth. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (01) 97-108
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Jansen LA, De Caigny P, Guay NA, Lineaweaver WC, Shokrollahi K. The evidence base for the acellular dermal matrix AlloDerm: a systematic review. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 70 (05) 587-594
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Daar DA, Gandy JR, Clark EG, Mowlds DS, Paydar KZ, Wirth GA. Plastic surgery and acellular dermal matrix: highlighting trends from 1999 to 2013. World J Plast Surg 2016; 5 (02) 97-108
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Shridharani SM, Tufaro AP. A systematic review of acelluar dermal matrices in head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (05) (Suppl. 02) 35S-43S
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Gryskiewicz JM, Rohrich RJ, Reagan BJ, Schwartz BM. The use of AlloDerm for the correction of nasal contour deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107 (02) 561-570 , discussion 571
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Jackson IT, Yavuzer R. AlloDerm for dorsal nasal irregularities. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107 (02) 553-558 , discussion 559–560
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Kridel RW, Foda H, Lunde KC. Septal perforation repair with acellular human dermal allograft. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998; 124 (01) 73-78
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Govindaraj S, Cohen M, Genden EM, Costantino PD, Urken ML. The use of acellular dermis in the prevention of Frey's syndrome. Laryngoscope 2001; 111 (11 Pt 1): 1993-1998
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Sinha UK, Saadat D, Doherty CM, Rice DH. Use of AlloDerm implant to prevent frey syndrome after parotidectomy. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003; 5 (01) 109-112
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Rohrich RJ, Reagan BJ, Adams Jr WP, Kenkel JM, Beran SJ. Early results of vermilion lip augmentation using acellular allogeneic dermis: an adjunct in facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (01) 409-416 , discussion 417–418
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Castor SA, To WC, Papay FA. Lip augmentation with AlloDerm acellular allogenic dermal graft and fat autograft: a comparison with autologous fat injection alone. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1999; 23 (03) 218-223
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Girod DA, Sykes K, Jorgensen J, Tawfik O, Tsue T. Acellular dermis compared to skin grafts in oral cavity reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2009; 119 (11) 2141-2149
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Sinha UK, Chang KE, Shih CW. Reconstruction of pharyngeal defects using AlloDerm and sternocleidomastoid muscle flap. Laryngoscope 2001; 111 (11 Pt 1): 1910-1916
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Clark JM, Saffold SH, Israel JM. Decellularized dermal grafting in cleft palate repair. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003; 5 (01) 40-44 , discussion 45
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Steele MH, Seagle MB. Palatal fistula repair using acellular dermal matrix: the University of Florida experience. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 56 (01) 50-53 , discussion 53
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Calì Cassi L, Massei A. The use of acellular dermal matrix in the closure of oronasal fistulae after cleft palate repair. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2015; 3 (03) e341
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Helling ER, Dev VR, Garza J, Barone C, Nelluri P, Wang PT. Low fistula rate in palatal clefts closed with the Furlow technique using decellularized dermis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (07) 2361-2365
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Cole P, Horn TW, Thaller S. The use of decellularized dermal grafting (AlloDerm) in persistent oro-nasal fistulas after tertiary cleft palate repair. J Craniofac Surg 2006; 17 (04) 636-641
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Kirschner RE, Cabiling DS, Slemp AE, Siddiqi F, LaRossa DD, Losee JE. Repair of oronasal fistulae with acellular dermal matrices. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (06) 1431-1440
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Losee JE, Smith DM. Acellular dermal matrix in palatoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2011; 31 (7, Suppl): 108S-115S
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Rubin PA, Fay AM, Remulla HD, Maus M. Ophthalmic plastic applications of acellular dermal allografts. Ophthalmology 1999; 106 (11) 2091-2097
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Shorr N, Perry JD, Goldberg RA, Hoenig J, Shorr J. The safety and applications of acellular human dermal allograft in ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery: a preliminary report. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 16 (03) 223-230
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 McCord C, Nahai FR, Codner MA, Nahai F, Hester TR. Use of porcine acellular dermal matrix (Enduragen) grafts in eyelids: a review of 69 patients and 129 eyelids. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (04) 1206-1213
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Hayek B, Hatef E, Nguyen M, Ho V, Hsu A, Esmaeli B. Acellular dermal graft (AlloDerm) for upper eyelid reconstruction after cancer removal. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 25 (06) 426-429
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Levin F, Turbin RE, Langer PD. Acellular human dermal matrix as a skin substitute for reconstruction of large periocular cutaneous defects. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 27 (01) 44-47
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Chang M, Ahn SE, Baek S. The effect and applications of acellular dermal allograft (AlloDerm) in ophthalmic plastic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014; 42 (05) 695-699
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Barret JP, Dziewulski P, McCauley RL, Herndon DN, Desai MH. Dural reconstruction of a class IV calvarial burn with decellularized human dermis. Burns 1999; 25 (05) 459-462
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Warren WL, Medary MB, Dureza CD. , et al. Dural repair using acellular human dermis: experience with 200 cases: technique assessment. Neurosurgery 2000; 46 (06) 1391-1396
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Germani RM, Vivero R, Herzallah IR, Casiano RR. Endoscopic reconstruction of large anterior skull base defects using acellular dermal allograft. Am J Rhinol 2007; 21 (05) 615-618
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Kinsella Jr CR, Grunwaldt LJ, Cooper GM, Mills MC, Losee JE. Scalp reconstruction: regeneration with acellular dermal matrix. J Craniofac Surg 2010; 21 (02) 605-607
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Singh M, Ricci JA, Dunn IF, Caterson EJ. AlloDerm covering over titanium cranioplasty may minimize contour deformities in the frontal bone position. J Craniofac Surg 2016; 27 (05) 1292-1294
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Sodha NR, Azoury SC, Sciortino C, Sacks JM, Yang SC. The use of acellular dermal matrices in chest wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (05) (Suppl. 02) 175S-182S
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Uflacker AB, Janis JE. The use of acellular dermal matrix in the correction of visible parasternal deformities after breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (01) 34e-36e
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Komorowska-Timek E, Oberg KC, Timek TA, Gridley DS, Miles DA. The effect of AlloDerm envelopes on periprosthetic capsule formation with and without radiation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (03) 807-816
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Moyer HR, Pinell-White X, Losken A. The effect of radiation on acellular dermal matrix and capsule formation in breast reconstruction: clinical outcomes and histologic analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (02) 214-221
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Seth AK, Hirsch EM, Fine NA, Kim JY. Utility of acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction in the setting of radiation: a comparative analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (04) 750-758
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Cothren CC, Gallego K, Anderson ED, Schmidt D. Chest wall reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm) and a latissimus muscle flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114 (04) 1015-1017
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Ge PS, Imai TA, Aboulian A, Van Natta TL. The use of human acellular dermal matrix for chest wall reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 90 (06) 1799-1804
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Butler CE, Langstein HN, Kronowitz SJ. Pelvic, abdominal, and chest wall reconstruction with AlloDerm in patients at increased risk for mesh-related complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116 (05) 1263-1275 , discussion 1276–1277
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Mirzabeigi MN, Moore Jr JH, Tuma GA. The use of Permacol for chest wall reconstruction in a case of desmoid tumour resection. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64 (03) 406-408
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Huston TL, Taback B, Rohde CH. Chest wall reconstruction with porcine acellular dermal matrix (Strattice) and a latissimus myocutaneous flap. Am Surg 2011; 77 (06) e115-e116
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Brunbjerg ME, Juhl AA, Damsgaard TE. Chest wall reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix (Strattice) and a TRAM flap. Acta Oncol 2013; 52 (05) 1052-1054
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Schmidt J, Redwan B, Koesek V. , et al. Thoracic wall reconstruction with acellular porcine dermal collagen matrix. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 64 (03) 245-251
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Lee KH, Kim KT, Son HS, Jung JS, Cho JH. Porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) for sternal reconstruction. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 46 (04) 312-315
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Kaplan KM, Chopra K, Feiner J, Gastman BR. Chest wall reconstruction with Strattice in an immunosuppressed patient. Eplasty 2011; 11: e46
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Yurteri-Kaplan LA, Gutman RE. The use of biological materials in urogynecologic reconstruction: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (05) (Suppl. 02) 242S-253S
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 Mericli AF, Martin JP, Campbell CA. An algorithmic anatomical subunit approach to pelvic wound reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (03) 1004-1017
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 57 Brizendine JB, LeFaivre JF, Yost MJ, Fann SA. Reconstruction of parasacral hernia with acellular human dermis graft. Hernia 2006; 10 (04) 360-363
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 58 Dasenbrock HH, Clarke MJ, Bydon A. , et al. Reconstruction of extensive defects from posterior en bloc resection of sacral tumors with human acellular dermal matrix and gluteus maximus myocutaneous flaps. Neurosurgery 2011; 69 (06) 1240-1247
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 59 Said HK, Bevers M, Butler CE. Reconstruction of the pelvic floor and perineum with human acellular dermal matrix and thigh flaps following pelvic exenteration. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 107 (03) 578-582
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 60 Musters GD, Lapid O, Stoker J, Musters BF, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ. Is there a place for a biological mesh in perineal hernia repair?. Hernia 2016; 20 (05) 747-754
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 61 Musters GD, Klaver CEL, Bosker RJI. , et al. Biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (the BIOPEX-study). Ann Surg 2017; 265 (06) 1074-1081
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 62 Abhinav K, Shaaban M, Raymond T, Oke T, Gullan R, Montgomery AC. Primary reconstruction of pelvic floor defects following sacrectomy using Permacol graft. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009; 35 (04) 439-443
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 63 Korn JM, Connolly MM, Walton RL. Single-stage sacral coccygectomy and repair using human acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm) with bilateral gluteus maximus flaps for hernia prophylaxis. Hernia 2009; 13 (03) 329-332
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 64 Han JG, Wang ZJ, Gao ZG, Xu HM, Yang ZH, Jin ML. Pelvic floor reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix after cylindrical abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53 (02) 219-223
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 65 Momoh AO, Kamat AM, Butler CE. Reconstruction of the pelvic floor with human acellular dermal matrix and omental flap following anterior pelvic exenteration. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (12) 2185-2187
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 66 Coon D, Calotta NA, Broyles JM, Sacks JM. Use of biological tissue matrix in postneurosurgical posterior trunk reconstruction is associated with higher wound complication rates. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (01) 104e-110e
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 67 Nahabedian MY. Acellular dermal matrices in primary breast reconstruction: principles, concepts, and indications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (05) (Suppl. 02) 44S-53S
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 68 Spear SL, Sher SR, Al-Attar A. Focus on technique: supporting the soft-tissue envelope in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (05) (Suppl. 02) 89S-94S
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 69 Salzberg CA. Focus on technique: one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (05) (Suppl. 02) 95S-103S
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 70 Slavin SA, Lin SJ. The use of acellular dermal matrices in revisional breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (05) (Suppl. 02) 70S-85S
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 71 Bengtson B. Acellular dermal matrices in secondary aesthetic breast surgery: indications, techniques, and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (05) (Suppl. 02) 142S-156S
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 72 Hester Jr TR, Ghazi BH, Moyer HR, Nahai FR, Wilton M, Stokes L. Use of dermal matrix to prevent capsular contracture in aesthetic breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (05) (Suppl. 02) 126S-136S
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 73 Basu CB, Jeffers L. The role of acellular dermal matrices in capsular contracture: a review of the evidence. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (05) (Suppl. 02) 118S-124S
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 74 Clemens MW, Kronowitz SJ. Acellular dermal matrix in irradiated tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction: evidence-based review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (05) (Suppl. 02) 27S-34S
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 75 Ho G, Nguyen TJ, Shahabi A, Hwang BH, Chan LS, Wong AK. A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications associated with acellular dermal matrix-assisted breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 68 (04) 346-356
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 76 Becker S, Saint-Cyr M, Wong C. , et al. AlloDerm versus DermaMatrix in immediate expander-based breast reconstruction: a preliminary comparison of complication profiles and material compliance. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (01) 1-6 , discussion 107–108
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 77 Sorkin M, Qi J, Kim HM. , et al. Acellular dermal matrix in immediate expander/implant breast reconstruction: a multicenter assessment of risks and benefits. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (06) 1091-1100
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 78 Israeli R. Complications of acellular dermal matrices in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (05) (Suppl. 02) 159S-172S
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 79 Jordan SW, Khavanin N, Fine NA, Kim JY. An algorithmic approach for selective acellular dermal matrix use in immediate two-stage breast reconstruction: indications and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (02) 178-188
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 80 Baumann DP, Butler CE. Bioprosthetic mesh in abdominal wall reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 2012; 26 (01) 18-24
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 81 Janis JE, O'Neill AC, Ahmad J, Zhong T, Hofer SO. Acellular dermal matrices in abdominal wall reconstruction: a systematic review of the current evidence. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (05) (Suppl. 02) 183S-193S
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 82 Kissane NA, Itani KM. A decade of ventral incisional hernia repairs with biologic acellular dermal matrix: what have we learned?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (05) (Suppl. 02) 194S-202S
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 83 Yang F, Ji-Ye L, Rong L, Wen T. Use of acellular dermal matrix combined with a component separation technique for repair of contaminated large ventral hernias: a possible ideal solution for this clinical challenge. Am Surg 2015; 81 (02) 150-156
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 84 Romain B, Story F, Meyer N, Delhorme JB, Brigand C, Rohr S. Comparative study between biologic porcine dermal meshes: risk factors of postoperative morbidity and recurrence. J Wound Care 2016; 25 (06) 320-325
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 85 Albino FP, Patel KM, Nahabedian MY, Attinger CE, Bhanot P. Immediate, multistaged approach to infected synthetic mesh: outcomes after abdominal wall reconstruction with porcine acellular dermal matrix. Ann Plast Surg 2015; 75 (06) 629-633
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 86 Sbitany H, Kwon E, Chern H, Finlayson E, Varma MG, Hansen SL. Outcomes analysis of biologic mesh use for abdominal wall reconstruction in clean-contaminated and contaminated ventral hernia repair. Ann Plast Surg 2015; 75 (02) 201-204
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 87 Huntington CR, Cox TC, Blair LJ. , et al. Biologic mesh in ventral hernia repair: Outcomes, recurrence, and charge analysis. Surgery 2016; 160 (06) 1517-1527
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 88 Iacco A, Adeyemo A, Riggs T, Janczyk R. Single institutional experience using biological mesh for abdominal wall reconstruction. Am J Surg 2014; 208 (03) 480-484 , discussion 483–484
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 89 Bochicchio GV, De Castro GP, Bochicchio KM, Weeks J, Rodriguez E, Scalea TM. Comparison study of acellular dermal matrices in complicated hernia surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 217 (04) 606-613
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 90 Cheng AW, Abbas MA, Tejirian T. Outcome of abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh: Permacol versus Strattice. Am Surg 2014; 80 (10) 999-1002
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 91 Giordano S, Garvey PB, Baumann DP, Liu J, Butler CE. Primary fascial closure with biologic mesh reinforcement results in lesser complication and recurrence rates than bridged biologic mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction: a propensity score analysis. Surgery 2017; 161 (02) 499-508
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 92 Richmond B, Ubert A, Judhan R. , et al. Component separation with porcine acellular dermal reinforcement is superior to traditional bridged mesh repairs in the open repair of significant midline ventral hernia defects. Am Surg 2014; 80 (08) 725-731
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 93 Garvey PB, Giordano SA, Baumann DP, Liu J, Butler CE. Long-term outcomes after abdominal wall reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix. J Am Coll Surg 2017; 224 (03) 341-350
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 94 Ellis CV, Kulber DA. Acellular dermal matrices in hand reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (05) (Suppl. 02) 256S-269S
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 95 Sinha UK, Shih C, Chang K, Rice DH. Use of AlloDerm for coverage of radial forearm free flap donor site. Laryngoscope 2002; 112 (02) 230-234
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 96 Wax MK, Winslow CP, Andersen PE. Use of allogenic dermis for radial forearm free flap donor site coverage. J Otolaryngol 2002; 31 (06) 341-345
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 97 Ho T, Couch M, Carson K, Schimberg A, Manley K, Byrne PJ. Radial forearm free flap donor site outcomes comparison by closure methods. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006; 134 (02) 309-315
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 98 Rowe NM, Morris L, Delacure MD. Acellular dermal composite allografts for reconstruction of the radial forearm donor site. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 57 (03) 305-311
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 99 Medina CR, Patel SA, Ridge JA, Topham NS. Improvement of the radial forearm flap donor defect by prelamination with human acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (05) 1993-1996
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 100 Smart NJ, Bryan N, Hunt JA, Daniels IR. Porcine dermis implants in soft-tissue reconstruction: current status. Biologics 2014; 8: 83-90
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 101 Schönmeyr B, Clavin N, Avraham T, Longo V, Mehrara BJ. Synthesis of a tissue-engineered periosteum with acellular dermal matrix and cultured mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng Part A 2009; 15 (07) 1833-1841
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 102 Dasgupta A, Orgill D, Galiano RD. , et al. A novel reticular dermal graft leverages architectural and biological properties to support wound repair. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016; 4 (10) e1065
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 103 Lafosse A, Desmet C, Aouassar N. , et al. Autologous adipose stromal cells seeded onto a human collagen matrix for dermal regeneration in chronic wounds: clinical proof of concept. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136 (02) 279-295
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 104 Nyame TT, Chiang HA, Leavitt T, Ozambela M, Orgill DP. Tissue-engineered skin substitutes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136 (06) 1379-1388
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 105 Woo AS, Jang JL, Liberman RF, Weinzweig J. Creation of a vascularized composite graft with acellular dermal matrix and hydroxyapatite. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (06) 1661-1669
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 106 Rendon JL, Hammer D, Sabino J. , et al. Restoration of full thickness soft tissue defects with spray skin epidermal regenerative technology in conjunction with dermal regenerate. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136 (4S): 74
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 107 Climov M, Bayer LR, Moscoso AV, Matsumine H, Orgill DP. The role of dermal matrices in treating inflammatory and diabetic wounds. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (3, Suppl): 148S-157S
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar