PDF herunterladen
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2019; 23(05): 477-488
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1693975
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Physiologic and Pathologic Development of the Infantile and Adolescent Hip Joint: Descriptive and Functional Aspects

Bernhard Heimkes 
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Pediatric Orthopaedic Section, Klinikum Dritter Orden, Munich, Germany
2   Integrative Center for Cerebral Palsy (Stiftung ICP Munich), Munich, Germany
3   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
,
Veronika Wegener
2   Integrative Center for Cerebral Palsy (Stiftung ICP Munich), Munich, Germany
,
Christof Birkenmaier
3   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
,
Christian M. Ziegler
3   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
25. September 2019 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

The basic law of mechanobiology states that the external form and internal architecture of the skeleton and joints follow the functional stimuli that act upon them. Radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging reflect the loading history of the growing child, enabling an experienced radiologist to analyze the clinical functioning of patients by interpreting imaging studies. Concerning the hip joint, the physes of the coxal femoral end, the coxal femoral epiphysis with its epiphyseal growth plate, as well as the apophysis of the greater trochanter with its trochanteric growth plate, are the essential organ structures subject to internal forces. They determine the definitive geometric shape of the proximal femur. Indirectly they influence the appearance of the acetabulum and the centration of the hip joint.

Keywords

hip development - proximal femur - hip joint - mechanobiology - functional anatomy
 

  • References

  • 1 Frost HM, Schönau E. The “muscle-bone unit” in children and adolescents: a 2000 overview. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2000; 13 (06) 571-590
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Leucht Ph, Kim JB, Helms JA. Cellular and molecular foundation for fracture healing in children. Eur J Trauma 2005; 2: 90-104
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Villemure I, Stokes IAF. Growth plate mechanics and mechanobiology. A survey of present understanding. J Biomech 2009; 42 (12) 1793-1803
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Mackie EJ, Tatarczuch L, Mirams M. The skeleton: a multi-functional complex organ: the growth plate chondrocyte and endochondral ossification. J Endocrinol 2011; 211 (02) 109-121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Brian JM, Choi DH, Moore MM. The primary physis. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2018; 22 (01) 95-103
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Siffert RS. Patterns of deformity of the developing hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1981; (160) 14-29
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ogden JA. Development and growth of the hip. In Katz JF, Siffert RS. , eds. Management of Hip Disorders in Children. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott; 1983
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Serrat MA, Reno PL, McCollum MA, Meindl RS, Lovejoy CO. Variation in mammalian proximal femoral development: comparative analysis of two distinct ossification patterns. J Anat 2007; 210 (03) 249-258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Putz R, Milz S. Macroscopic and functional anatomy of the apophyseal plate [in German]. Orthopade 2016; 45 (03) 199-205
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Jouve JL, Glard Y, Garron E. , et al. Anatomical study of the proximal femur in the fetus. J Pediatr Orthop B 2005; 14 (02) 105-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bonneau N, Simonis C, Seringe R, Tardieu C. Study of femoral torsion during prenatal growth: interpretations associated with the effects of intrauterine pressure. Am J Phys Anthropol 2011; 145 (03) 438-445
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Tönnis D. Normal values of the hip joint for the evaluation of X-rays in children and adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976; (119) 39-47
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Wientroub S, Tardiman R, Green I, Salama R, Weissman SL. The development of the normal infantile hip as expressed by radiological measurements. Int Orthop 1981; 4 (04) 239-241
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Scoles PV, Boyd A, Jones PK. Roentgenographic parameters of the normal infant hip. J Pediatr Orthop 1987; 7 (06) 656-663
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Than P, Sillinger T, Kránicz J, Bellyei A. Radiographic parameters of the hip joint from birth to adolescence. Pediatr Radiol 2004; 34 (03) 237-244
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Birkenmaier C, Jorysz G, Jansson V, Heimkes B. Normal development of the hip: a geometrical analysis based on planimetric radiography. J Pediatr Orthop B 2010; 19 (01) 1-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Graf R. Guide to Sonography of the Infant Hip. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme; 1986
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Wegener V, Jorysz G, Arnoldi A. , et al. Normal radiological unossified hip joint space and femoral head size development during growth in 675 children and adolescents. Clin Anat 2017; 30 (02) 267-275
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Heimkes B, Posel P, Plitz W, Jansson V. Forces acting on the juvenile hip joint in the one-legged stance. J Pediatr Orthop 1993; 13 (04) 431-436
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Heimkes B, Posel P, Plitz W, Zimmer M. Age-related force distribution at the proximal end of the femur in normally growing children [in German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1997; 135 (01) 17-23
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Wolff J. Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen. Berlin, Germany: A.Hischwald; 1892
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Roux W. Gesammelte Abhandlungen über Entwicklungsmechanik der Organismen. Bd II. Leipzig, Germany: Wilhelm Engelmann; 1895
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Pauwels F. Biomechanics of the Normal and Diseased Hip: Theoretical Foundation, Technique and Results of Treatment: An Atlas. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 1976
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Miller F, Slomczykowski M, Cope R, Lipton GE. Computer modeling of the pathomechanics of spastic hip dislocation in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1999; 19 (04) 486-492
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ribble TG, Santare MH, Miller F. Stresses in the growth plate of the developing proximal femur. J Appl Biomech 2001; 17: 129-141
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Carter DR, Beaupré GS. Skeletal Function and Form. Mechanobiology of Skeletal Development, Aging, and Regeneration. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2001
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Fetto J, Leali A, Moroz A. Evolution of the Koch model of the biomechanics of the hip: clinical perspective. J Orthop Sci 2002; 7 (06) 724-730
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Shefelbine SJ, Carter DR. Mechanobiological predictions of femoral anteversion in cerebral palsy. Ann Biomed Eng 2004; 32 (02) 297-305
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Lenaerts G, Bartels W, Gelaude F. , et al. Subject-specific hip geometry and hip joint centre location affects calculated contact forces at the hip during gait. J Biomech 2009; 42 (09) 1246-1251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Carriero A, Zavatsky A, Stebbins J. , et al. Influence of altered gait patterns on the hip joint contact forces. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2014; 17 (04) 352-359
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Yadav P, Shefelbine SJ, Pontén E, Gutierrez-Farewik EM. Influence of muscle groups' activation on proximal femoral growth tendency. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2017; 16 (06) 1869-1883
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Chan EF, Farnsworth CL, Klisch SM, Hosalkar HS, Sah RL. 3-dimensional metrics of proximal femoral shape deformities in Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease and slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Orthop Res 2018; 36 (05) 1526-1535
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Pinheiro MDS, Dobson C, Clarke NM, Fagan M. The potential role of variations in juvenile hip geometry on the development of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease: a biomechanical investigation. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2018; 21 (02) 194-200
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Tardieu C. Development of the human hind limb and its importance for the evolution of bipedalism. Evol Anthropol 2010; 19: 174-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Bonneau N, Baylac M, Gagey O, Tardieu C. Functional integrative analysis of the human hip joint: the three-dimensional orientation of the acetabulum and its relation with the orientation of the femoral neck. J Hum Evol 2014; 69: 55-69
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36. Ruff C, Holt B, Trinkaus E. Who's afraid of the big bad Wolff?: “Wolff's law” and bone functional adaptation. Am J Phys Anthropol 2006; 129 (04) 484-498
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Heimkes B. The great apophyses: Functional strain and relevance [in German]. Orthopade 2016; 45 (03) 206-212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Lovejoy CO. The natural history of human gait and posture. Part 2. Hip and thigh. Gait Posture 2005; 21 (01) 113-124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Holliday TW, Hutchinson VT, Morrow MMB, Livesay GA. Geometric morphometric analyses of hominid proximal femora: taxonomic and phylogenetic considerations. Homo 2010; 61 (01) 3-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Anderson M, Messner MB, Green WT. Distribution of lengths of the normal femur and tibia in children from one to eighteen years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1964; 46: 1197-1202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Long Y, Leslie WD, Luo Y. Study of DXA-derived lateral-medial cortical bone thickness in assessing hip fracture risk. Bone Rep 2015; 2: 44-51
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Duncan JS, Schofield G, Duncan EK. Step count recommendations for children based on body fat. Prev Med 2007; 44 (01) 42-44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Laurson KR, Eisenmann JC, Welk GJ, Wickel EE, Gentile DA, Walsh DA. Evaluation of youth pedometer-determined physical activity guidelines using receiver operator characteristic curves. Prev Med 2008; 46 (05) 419-424
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Dollman J, Olds TS, Esterman A, Kupke T. Pedometer step guidelines in relation to weight status among 5- to 16-year-old Australians. Pediatr Exerc Sci 2010; 22 (02) 288-300
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A. Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. J Biomech 1993; 26 (08) 969-990
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Correa TA, Crossley KM, Kim HJ, Pandy MG. Contributions of individual muscles to hip joint contact force in normal walking. J Biomech 2010; 43 (08) 1618-1622
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Skuban TP, Vogel T, Baur-Melnyk A, Jansson V, Heimkes B. Function-orientated structural analysis of the proximal human femur. Cells Tissues Organs 2009; 190 (05) 247-255
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Sallam A, Ziegler CM, Jansson V, Heimkes B. The underused hip in ipsilaterally orthotics-dependent children. J Child Orthop 2015; 9 (04) 255-262
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Steinbrueck A, Hocke S, Heimkes B. Apophyseolysis of the greater trochanter through excessive sports: a case report. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (01) 195-198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Oskoui M, Coutinho F, Dykeman J, Jetté N, Pringsheim T. An update on the prevalence of cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol 2013; 55 (06) 509-519
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Robin J, Graham HK, Selber P, Dobson F, Smith K, Baker R. Proximal femoral geometry in cerebral palsy: a population-based cross-sectional study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90 (10) 1372-1379
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Larnert P, Risto O, Hägglund G, Wagner P. Hip displacement in relation to age and gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. J Child Orthop 2014; 8 (02) 129-134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Walter S, Russell D, Wood E, Galuppi B. Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 1997; 39 (04) 214-223
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 El-Sobky TA, Fayyad TA, Kotb AM, Kaldas B. Bony reconstruction of hip in cerebral palsy children Gross Motor Function Classification System levels III to V: a systematic review. J Pediatr Orthop B 2018; 27 (03) 221-230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Heimkes B, Stotz S, Heid T. Pathogenesis and prevention of spastic hip dislocation [in German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1992; 130 (05) 413-418
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Heimkes B, Martignoni K, Utzschneider S, Stotz S. Soft tissue release of the spastic hip by psoas-rectus transfer and adductor tenotomy for long-term functional improvement and prevention of hip dislocation. J Pediatr Orthop B 2011; 20 (04) 212-221
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Mockford M, Caulton JM. The pathophysiological basis of weakness in children with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther 2010; 22 (02) 222-233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Reimers J. The stability of the hip in children. A radiological study of the results of muscle surgery in cerebral palsy. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1980; 184: 1-100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Langenskiöld A, Salenius P. Epiphyseodesis of the greater trochanter. Acta Orthop Scand 1967; 38 (02) 199-219
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Schneidmueller D, Carstens C, Thomsen M. Surgical treatment of overgrowth of the greater trochanter in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop 2006; 26 (04) 486-490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Günther CMJ, Komm M, Jansson V, Heimkes B. Midterm results after subtrochanteric end-to-side valgization osteotomy in severe infantile coxa vara. J Pediatr Orthop 2013; 33 (04) 353-360
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Heimkes B, Komm M, Melcher C. Subtrochanteric end-to-side valgus osteotomy for severe infantile coxa vara [in German]. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2009; 21 (01) 97-111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Eilert RE, Hill K, Bach J. Greater trochanteric transfer for the treatment of coxa brevis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; (434) 92-101
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Hefti F, Morscher E. The femoral neck lengthening osteotomy. Orthop Traumatol 1993; 2 (03) 144-151
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Viernstein K, Rosemeyer B, Henning A. Eine Möglichkeit zur operativen Therapie der primären Protrusio acetabuli. Arch Orthop Traumatol 1970; 67: 291-302
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Leunig M, Nho SJ, Turchetto L, Ganz R. Protrusio acetabuli: new insights and experience with joint preservation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467 (09) 2241-2250
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Heimkes B, Schmidutz F, Rösner J, Frimberger V, Weber P. Modified Salter innominate osteotomy in adults [in German]. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2018; 30 (06) 457-468
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Stem ES, O'Connor MI, Kransdorf MJ, Crook J. Computed tomography analysis of acetabular anteversion and abduction. Skeletal Radiol 2006; 35 (06) 385-389
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Werner CML, Ramseier LE, Ruckstuhl T. , et al. Normal values of Wiberg's lateral center-edge angle and Lequesne's acetabular index—a coxometric update. Skeletal Radiol 2012; 41 (10) 1273-1278
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Crockarell Jr JR, Trousdale RT, Guyton JL. The anterior centre-edge angle. A cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000; 82 (04) 532-534
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Siebenrock KA, Wahab KHA, Werlen S, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R. Abnormal extension of the femoral head epiphysis as a cause of cam impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (418) 54-60
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Lütken P. Bone-bridge formation between the greater trochanter and the femoral head: a normal variation of the pattern of the ossification in the upper end of the femur in adolescence. Acta Orthop Scand 1961; 31: 209-215
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Struijs PAA, Oostra RJ, van Rijn RR, Besselaar PP. Abnormal growth of the proximal femur due to apophyseal-epiphyseal coalescence resulting in coxa valga—a report of two cases in adolescents. Acta Orthop 2011; 82 (04) 507-509
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Murray RO, Duncan C. Athletic activity in adolescence as an etiological factor in degenerative hip disease. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1971; 53 (03) 406-419
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Agricola R, Heijboer M, Ginai AZ. , et al. A cam deformity is gradually acquired during skeletal maturation in adolescent and young male soccer players. Am J Sports Med 2014; 4: 798-806
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Klit J, Gosvig K, Magnussen E. , et al. Cam deformity and hip degeneration are common after fixation of a slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Acta Orthop 2014; 85 (06) 585-591
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Loder RT. Controversies in slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Orthop Clin North Am 2006; 37 (02) 211-221 , vii
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar