Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000018.xml
Facial Plast Surg 2020; 36(01): 028-033
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701487
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701487
Original Article
Revision Rhinoplasty: Conservation versus Deconstruction
Further Information
Publication History
Publication Date:
19 March 2020 (online)
Abstract
Revision rhinoplasty requires the surgeon to strike a careful balance between conservation and deconstruction. Contemporary rhinoplasty has focused on structural cartilage grafts. These grafts resist static and dynamic forces produced by tissue contraction, gravity, and pressure gradients during respiration. However, the simultaneous use of multiple grafts also leads to an increased deconstruction of natural supports. In this article, we discuss some simple yet effective techniques in revision rhinoplasty in a case-based format.
-
References
- 1 McKinney P, Cook JQ. A critical evaluation of 200 rhinoplasties. Ann Plast Surg 1981; 7 (05) 357-361
- 2 Pardina AJ, Vaca JF. Evaluation of the different methods used in the treatment of rhinoplastic sequelae. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1983; 7 (04) 237-239
- 3 Lee LN, Quatela O, Bhattacharyya N. The epidemiology of autologous tissue grafting in primary and revision rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 2019; 129 (07) 1549-1553
- 4 Adamson PA, Gantous A. Once upon a rhinoplasty: the history of the “queen” of facial plastic surgery. Facial Plast Surg 2019; 35 (04) 322-339
- 5 Sheen JH. Spreader graft: a method of reconstructing the roof of the middle nasal vault following rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 73 (02) 230-239
- 6 Varadharajan K, Sethukumar P, Anwar M, Patel K. Complications associated with the use of autologous costal cartilage in rhinoplasty: a systematic review. Aesthet Surg J 2015; 35 (06) 644-652
- 7 Wee JH, Park MH, Oh S, Jin HR. Complications associated with autologous rib cartilage use in rhinoplasty: a meta-analysis. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2015; 17 (01) 49-55