Ethical Use of Electronic Health Record Data and Artificial Intelligence: Recommendations of the Primary Care Informatics Working Group of the International Medical Informatics Association

Summary

Objective: To create practical recommendations for the curation of routinely collected health data and artificial intelligence (AI) in primary care with a focus on ensuring their ethical use.

Methods: We defined data curation as the process of management of data throughout its lifecycle to ensure it can be used into the future. We used a literature review and Delphi exercises to capture insights from the Primary Care Informatics Working Group (PCIWG) of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA).

Results: We created six recommendations: (1) Ensure consent and formal process to govern access and sharing throughout the data life cycle; (2) Sustainable data creation/collection requires trust and permission; (3) Pay attention to Extract-Transform-Load (ETL) processes as they may have unrecognised risks; (4) Integrate data governance and data quality management to support clinical practice in integrated care systems; (5) Recognise the need for new processes to address the ethical issues arising from AI in primary care; (6) Apply an ethical framework mapped to the data life cycle, including an assessment of data quality to achieve effective data curation.

Conclusions: The ethical use of data needs to be integrated within the curation process, hence running throughout the data lifecycle. Current information systems may not fully detect the risks associated with ETL and AI; they need careful scrutiny. With distributed integrated care systems where data are often used remote from documentation, harmonised data quality assessment, management, and governance is important. These recommendations should help maintain trust and connectedness in contemporary information systems and planned developments.

Keywords

Ethics - clinical - data accuracy - information systems - medical record systems - computerized - Artificial Intelligence

• References

• 1 World Health Organisation Secretariat. Framework on integrated, people-centred health services. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2016 15 Apr. Report No.: A69/39
• 2 McGovern A, Hinton W, Corra A, Munro N, Whyte M, de Lusignan S. Real-world evidence studies into treatment adherence, thresholds for intervention and disparities in people with T2DM in the UK. BMJ Open 2016; 6 (11) e012801
• 3 Coiera E. The Price of Artificial Intelligence. Yearb Med Inform 2019; 28 (01) 14-5
• 4 Eze B, Kuziemsky C, Peyton L. A configurable identity matching algorithm for community care management. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 2019
• 5 Abouelmehdi K, Beni-Hessane A, Khaloufi H. Big healthcare data: preserving security and privacy. J Big Data 2018; 5 (01) 1
• 6 Presser L, Hruskova M, Rowbottom H, Kancir J. Care data and access to UK health records: patient privacy and public trust. Technology Science 2015; 2015081103
• 7 US Department of Health & Human Services. Security of certified EHR technology under meaningful use; 2018. [Internet] [cited 2020 Feb 20] Available from: https://oig.hhs.gov/reports-and-publications/workplan/summary/wp-summary-0000016.asp
• 8 Goble C, Stevens R, Hull D, Wolstencroft K, Lopez R. Data curation + process curation=data integration + science. Brief Bioinform 2008; 9 (06) 506-17
• 9 Liyanage H, de Lusignan S, Liaw ST, Kuziemsky C, Mold F, Krause P. , et al. Big Data Usage Patterns in the Health Care Domain: A Use Case Driven Approach Applied to the Assessment of Vaccination Benefits and Risks. Yearb Med Inform 2014; 27-35
• 10 Liyanage H, Liaw ST, Di Iorio CT, Kuziemsky C, Schreiber R, Terry AL. , et al. Building a Privacy, Ethics, and Data Access Framework for Real World Computerised Medical Record System Data: A Delphi Study. Contribution of the Primary Health Care Informatics Working Group. Yearb Med Inform 2016; 1: 138-45
• 11 Liyanage H, Liaw ST, Jonnagaddala J, Schreiber R, Kuziemsky C, Terry AL. , et al. Artificial Intelligence in Primary Health Care: Perceptions, Issues, and Challenges. Yearb Med Inform 2019; 41-6
• 12 de Lusignan S, Liaw ST, Krause P, Curcin V, Tristan Vicente M, Michalakidis G. , et al. Key concepts to assess the readiness of data for International research: Data quality, lineage and provenance, extraction and processing errors, traceability, and curation. Yearb Med Inform 2011; 112-21
• 13 Liaw S, Tam M. Ethical research or research ethics?. Aus Fam Physician 2015; 44 (07) 522-3
• 14 Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJJ, Appelton G, Axton M, Baak A. , et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data 2016; 3: 160018
• 15 Cate FH. The Failure of Fair Information Practice Principles. Consumer Protection in the Age of the Information Economy; 2006
• 16 Di Iorio CT, Carinci F, Brillante M, Azzoopardi J, Beck P, Bratina N. , et al. Cross-border flow of health information: is ‘privacy by design’ enough? Privacy performance assessment in EUBIROD. Eur J Public Health 2013; 23 (02) 247-53
• 17 Liaw ST, Powell-Davies G, Pearce C, Britt H, Mc-Glynn L, Harris MF. Optimising use of EHR data: current issues, evolving opportunities, strategies and scope for collaboration. Aust Fam Physician 2015; 45 (03) 153-6
• 18 Liaw ST, Taggart J, Yu H, de Lusignan S, Kuziemsky C, Hayen A. Integrating electronic health record information to support integrated care: practical application of ontologies. J Biomed Inform 2014; 52: 364-72
• 19 Tham TYTT, Prueksaritanond S, Isidro JS, Setia S. Welluppillai V Integrated health care systems in Asia: an urgent necessity. Clin Interv Aging 2018; 13: 2527-38
• 20 Azarm M, Backman C, Kuziemsky C. System level patient-centered data sharing. Proc 2019 IEEE/ACM 1st Int Workshop on Software Engineering for Healthcare, SEH 2019; 2019:45-8
• 21 McLean R, DeLong D, Moyer D. The U.S. health care system is ill and needs a bold new prescription. Ann Inter Medi 2020; 172 (2_Supplement): S1-S2
• 22 Benchoufi M, Ravaud P. Blockchain technology for improving clinical research quality. Trials 2017; 18 (01) 335
• 23 Sunyaev A, Dehling T, Taylor P, Mandl K. Availability and quality of mobile health app privacy policies. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015; 22 (e1): e28-e33
• 24 Kim D, Ferrin D, Rao H. A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: the role of trust, perceived risks and their antecedents. Decision Support System 2008; 44 (02) 544-64
• 25 de Lusignan S, Chan T, Theadom A, Dhoul N. The roles of policy and professionalism in the protection of processed clinical data: A literature review. Int J Med Inform 2007; 76 (04) 261-8
• 26 Fiske A, Buyx A, Prainsack B. Health Information Counselors: A New Profession for the Age of Big Data. Acad Med 2019; 94 (01) 37-41
• 27 Prasser F, Spengler H, Bild R, Eicher J, Kuhn KA. Privacy-enhancing ETL-processes for biomedical data. Int J Med Inform 2019; 126: 72-81
• 28 Culnane C, Rubinstein B, Teague V. Health data in an open world (arXiv:1712.05627). Computers and Society; 2017
• 29 Guo GN, Jonnagaddala J, Farhsid S, Huser V, Reich C, Liaw ST. Comparison of cohort selection performance of Aust Med Terminology to Anatomic Therapeutic Chemical mappings. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (11) 37-1246
• 30 Ohno-Machado L. Understanding and mitigating the digital divide in health care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 24 (05) 881
• 31 Lavigne M, Mussa F, Creatore MI, Hoffman SJ, Buckeridge DL. A population health perspective on artificial intelligence. Healthc Manage Forum 2019; 32 (04) 173-7
• 32 Liaw S, Pearce C, Liyanage H, Cheah-Liaw G, de Lusignan S. An integrated organisation-wide data quality management and information governance framework: theoretical underpinnings. Inform Prim Care 2014; 21 (04) 1-8
• 33 Carter RE, Attia ZI, Lopez-Jimenez F, Friedman PA. Pragmatic considerations for fostering reproducible research in artiicial intelligence. NPJ Digit Med 2019; 2: 42
• 34 US Food & Drug Administration. [Internet] Artificial intelligence and machine learning in software as a medical device. [cited 2020 Feb 20] Available from: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/software-medical-device-samd/artificial-intel-ligence-and-machine-learning-software-medical-device . 2020 Jan 28.
• 35 Zhang B. Public opinion lessons for AI regulation. [cited 2020 Feb 20]. Brookings; 2019 Dec 10. Available from: https://www.brookings.edu/research/public-opinion-lessons-for-ai-regulation/
• 36 European Commission. White Paper on artificial intelligence: A European approach to excellence and trust. Brussels; 2020 Feb 19
• 37 Birkeneder E, Explainable AI. In Health Care: Gaining Context Behind A Diagnosis: Forbes; 2019. Available from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikbirkender/2019/10/16/explain-able-ai-in-health-care-gaining-context-behind-a-di-agnosis/#46e2086c4bee . [accessed 2020 Feb 20]
• 38 Lin SY, Mahoney MR, Sinsky CA. Ten Ways Artificial Intelligence Will Transform Primary Care. J Gen Intern Med 2019; 34 (08) 1626-30
• 39 Hajian S, Bonchi F, Castillo C. Algorithmic bias: From discrimination discovery to fairness-aware data mining. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; 2016. p. 2125-6
• 40 Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, Mullainathan S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science 2019; 366 (6464): 447
• 41 Magrabi F, Ammenwerth E, McNair JB, De Keizer NF, Hyppönen H, Nykänen P. , et al. Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Decision Support: Challenges for Evaluating AI and Practical Implications. Yearb Med Inform 2019; 128-34
• 42 Eze B, Kuziemsky C, Peyton L. Cloud-based performance management of community care services. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process 2018; 30 (07) e1897
• 43 Kobie N. The quantum clock is ticking on encryption - and your data is under threat. Wired Security [Internet] 2016 . [cited 2020 Feb 20]. Available from: https://www.wired.co.uk/article/quantum-computers-quantum-security-encryption