Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2021; 34(04): 223-233
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721708
Original Research

Evaluation of a Feline Bone Surrogate and In Vitro Mechanical Comparison of Small Interlocking Nail Systems in Mediolateral Bending

Danielle M. Marturello
1   Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States
,
Dirsko J.F. von Pfeil
1   Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States
,
Loïc M. Déjardin
1   Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States
› Author Affiliations Funding This study was funded in part by the Michigan State University Endowed Research Fund and the ACVS Surgeon In-Training grant.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to (1) evaluate bending structural properties of a machined short fibre epoxy (SFE) feline bone surrogate (FBS), (2) compare the bending behaviour of small angle-stable interlocking nails (I-Loc; Targon) and locking compression plates (LCP) and (3) evaluate the effect of implant removal on FBS bending strength.

Methods Part 1: Feline cadaveric femurs (n = 10) and FBS (n = 4) underwent cyclic four-point bending and load to failure. Part 2: Fracture gap FBS constructs (n = 4/group) were stabilized in a bridging fashion with either I-Loc 3 and 4, Targon 2.5 and 3.0, LCP 2.0 and 2.4, then cyclically bent. Part 3: Intact FBS with pilot holes, simulating explantation, (n = 4/group) underwent destructive bending tests. Bending compliance, angular deformation and failure moment (FM) were statistically compared (p < 0.05).

Results Native bone and FBS were similar for all outcome measures (p > 0.05). The smallest and largest bending compliance and angular deformation were seen in the I-Loc 4 and LCP 2.0 respectively (p < 0.05). While explanted Targon FBS had the lowest FM (p < 0.05), I-Loc and LCP constructs FM were not different (p > 0.05).

Conclusion The similar bending properties of short fibre epoxy made FBS and native feline femurs suggest that this model could be used for mechanical testing of implants designed for feline long bone osteosynthesis. The I-Loc constructs smaller angular deformation which also suggests that these implants represent a valid alternative to size-matched Targon and LCP for feline fracture osteosynthesis. The significantly lower FM of explanted Targon may increase the risk of secondary fracture following implant removal.

Keywords

interlocking nails - feline - bone surrogate - bending - locking compression plate

Note

This study was presented in part at the 2020 ACVS Symposium online.


Authors' Contributions

D.M., D.V.P. and L.D. conceptualized and designed the study. D.M. and L.D. contributed to acquisition of data and data analysis and interpretation. All the authors drafted/revised and approved the submitted manuscript and are publically accountable for relevant content.




Publication History

Received: 09 May 2020

Accepted: 27 October 2020

Article published online:
27 December 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 An YH, Barfield WR, Drauhgn RA. Basic concepts of mechanical property measurements and bone biomechanics. In: An YH, Drauhgn RA. eds. Mechanical Testing of Bone and the Bone Implant Interface. New York: CRC Press LLC; 2000: 23-39
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Gibson TW, Moens NMM, Runciman RJ, Holmberg DL, Monteith GM. The biomechanical properties of the feline femur. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21 (04) 312-317
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Marturello DM, Wei F, Déjardin LM. Characterization of the torsional structural properties of feline femurs and surrogate bone models for mechanical testing of orthopedic implants. Vet Surg 2019; 48 (02) 229-236
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Acker ML, Torrance B, Kowaleski MP, Boudrieau RJ. Structural properties of synthetic bone models compared to native canine bone. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Scientific Meeting of the European College of Veterinary Surgeons 2010: 150-151
  • 5 Aper RL, Litsky AS, Roe SC, Johnson KA. Effect of bone diameter and eccentric loading on fatigue life of cortical screws used with interlocking nails. Am J Vet Res 2003; 64 (05) 569-573
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hammel SP, Elizabeth Pluhar G, Novo RE, Bourgeault CA, Wallace LJ. Fatigue analysis of plates used for fracture stabilization in small dogs and cats. Vet Surg 2006; 35 (06) 573-578
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Lansdowne JL, Sinnott MT, Déjardin LM, Ting D, Haut RC. In vitro mechanical comparison of screwed, bolted, and novel interlocking nail systems to buttress plate fixation in torsion and mediolateral bending. Vet Surg 2007; 36 (04) 368-377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Gibson TW, Moens NM, Runciman RJ, Holmberg DL. Evaluation of a short glass fibre-reinforced tube as a model for cat femur for biomechanical testing of orthopaedic implants. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21 (03) 195-201
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Harari J. Treatments for feline long bone fractures. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2002; 32 (04) 927-947
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hottmann NM, Johnson MD, Banks SA, Tuyn D, Lewis DD. Biomechanical comparison of two locking plate constructs for the stabilization of feline tibial fractures. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2020; 33 (02) 89-95
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Voss K, Kull M, Hässig M, Montavon P. Repair of long-bone fractures in cats and small dogs with the Unilock mandible locking plate system. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22 (05) 398-405
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Perren SM. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84 (08) 1093-1110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Vallefuoco R, Le Pommellet H, Savin A. et al. Complications of appendicular fracture repair in cats and small dogs using locking compression plates. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2016; 29 (01) 46-52
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Morris AP, Anderson AA, Barnes DM. et al. Plate failure by bending following tibial fracture stabilisation in 10 cats. J Small Anim Pract 2016; 57 (09) 472-478
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Duhautois B. Use of veterinary interlocking nails for diaphyseal fractures in dogs and cats: 121 cases. Vet Surg 2003; 32 (01) 8-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Larin A, Eich CS, Parker RB, Stubbs WP. Repair of diaphyseal femoral fractures in cats using interlocking intramedullary nails: 12 cases (1996-2000). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001; 219 (08) 1098-1104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Díaz-Bertrana MC, Durall I, Puchol JL, Sánchez A, Franch J. Interlocking nail treatment of long-bone fractures in cats: 33 cases (1995-2004). Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005; 18 (03) 119-126
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Fauron AH, Déjardin LM, Phillips R, Gazzola KM, Perry KL. Clinical application of the I–LOC angle-stable interlocking nail in 100 traumatic fractures of the humerus, femur and tibia. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2018; 31 (S02): A3642
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Brückner M, Unger M, Spies M. In vitro biomechanical comparison of a newly designed interlocking nail system to a standard DCP. Testing of cat femora in an osteotomy gap model. Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Klientiere Heimtiere 2014; 42 (02) 79-87
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Marturello DM, von Pfeil DJF, Déjardin LM. Mechanical comparison of two small interlocking nails in torsion using a feline bone surrogate. Vet Surg 2020; 49 (02) 380-389
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Déjardin LM, Cabassu JB, Guillou RP, Villwock M, Guiot LP, Haut RC. In vivo biomechanical evaluation of a novel angle-stable interlocking nail design in a canine tibial fracture model. Vet Surg 2014; 43 (03) 271-281
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Ting D, Cabassu JB, Guillou RP. et al. In vitro evaluation of the effect of fracture configuration on the mechanical properties of standard and novel interlocking nail systems in bending. Vet Surg 2009; 38 (07) 881-887
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Macedo AS, Moens NM, Runciman J, Gibson TW, Minto BW. Ex vivo torsional properties of a 2.5 mm veterinary interlocking nail system in canine femurs. Comparison with a 2.4 mm limited contact bone plate. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2017; 30 (02) 118-124
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Brückner M, Unger M, Spies M. Early clinical experience with a newly designed interlocking nail system-Targon(®) vet. Vet Surg 2016; 45 (06) 754-763
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Edgerton BC, An KN, Morrey BF. Torsional strength reduction due to cortical defects in bone. J Orthop Res 1990; 8 (06) 851-855
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Déjardin LM, Guillou RP, Ting D, Sinnott MT, Meyer E, Haut RC. Effect of bending direction on the mechanical behaviour of interlocking nail systems. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22 (04) 264-269
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Silbernagel JT, Kennedy SC, Johnson AL, Pijanowski GJ, Ehrhart N, Schaeffer D. Validation of canine cancellous and cortical polyurethane foam bone models. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2002; 15 (04) 200-204
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Déjardin LM, Lansdowne JL, Sinnott MT, Sidebotham CG, Haut RC. In vitro mechanical evaluation of torsional loading in simulated canine tibiae for a novel hourglass-shaped interlocking nail with a self-tapping tapered locking design. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67 (04) 678-685
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Gardner MP, Chong AC, Pollock AG, Wooley PH. Mechanical evaluation of large-size fourth-generation composite femur and tibia models. Ann Biomed Eng 2010; 38 (03) 613-620
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Szivek JA. Synthetic materials and structures used as models for bone. In: An YH, Draughn RA. eds. Mechanical Testing of Bone and the Bone-Implant Interface. New York: CRC Press LLC; 2000: 159-171
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Burns CG, Litsky AS, Allen MJ, Johnson KA. Influence of locking bolt location on the mechanical properties of an interlocking nail in the canine femur. Vet Surg 2011; 40 (05) 522-530
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Stoffel K, Dieter U, Stachowiak G, Gächter A, Kuster MS. Biomechanical testing of the LCP--how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled?. Injury 2003; 34 (Suppl. 02) B11-B19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Goodno BJ, Gere JM. Chapter 9: Deflection of beams. In: Goodno BJ, Gere JM. eds. Mechanics of Materials. 9th edition. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning; 2018: 849
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Palierne S, Froidefond B, Swider P, Autefage A. Biomechanical comparison of two locking plate constructs under cyclic loading in four-point bending in a fracture gap model: two screws versus three screws per fragment. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2019; 32 (01) 59-66
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Reems MR, Pluhar GE, Wheeler DL. Ex vivo comparison of one versus two distal screws in 8 mm model 11 interlocking nails used to stabilize canine distal femoral fractures. Vet Surg 2006; 35 (02) 161-167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Leggon RE, Lindsey RW, Panjabi MM. Strength reduction and the effects of treatment of long bones with diaphyseal defects involving 50% of the cortex. J Orthop Res 1988; 6 (04) 540-546
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Main RP, Biewener AA. Skeletal strain patterns and growth in the emu hindlimb during ontogeny. J Exp Biol 2007; 210 (Pt 15): 2676-2690
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Yang PF, Sanno M, Ganse B. et al. Torsion and antero-posterior bending in the in vivo human tibia loading regimes during walking and running. PLoS One 2014; 9 (04) e94525
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Gautier E, Perren SM, Cordey J. Strain distribution in plated and unplated sheep tibia an in vivo experiment. Injury 2000; 31 (Suppl. 03) C37-C44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Ahmad M, Nanda R, Bajwa AS, Candal-Couto J, Green S, Hui AC. Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability?. Injury 2007; 38 (03) 358-364
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar