J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2022; 83(S 02): e135-e142
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1722934
Original Article

Occipital Neuralgia following Acoustic Neuroma Resection

Autoren

  • Loren N. Riedy

    1   Department of Neurological Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, United States
    2   University of Chicago, Committee on Neurobiology, Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Daniel M. Heiferman

    1   Department of Neurological Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, United States
  • Caroline C. Szujewski

    1   Department of Neurological Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, United States
    2   University of Chicago, Committee on Neurobiology, Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Giselle EK. Malina

    1   Department of Neurological Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, United States
  • Elhaum G. Rezaii

    1   Department of Neurological Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, United States
  • Brendan Martin

    3   Department of Research, National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Kurt A. Grahnke

    1   Department of Neurological Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, United States
  • Michael Doerrler

    4   Department of Neurology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, United States
  • John P. Leonetti

    5   Department of Otolaryngology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, United States
  • Douglas E. Anderson

    1   Department of Neurological Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, United States

Funding None.

Abstract

Background While postoperative outcomes of acoustic neuroma (AN) resection commonly consider hearing preservation and facial function, headache is a critical quality of life factor. Postoperative headache is described in the literature; however, there is limited discussion specific to occipital neuralgia (ON) following AN resection.

Objective The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of conservative management and surgery.

Methods We conducted a retrospective review of 872 AN patients who underwent resection at our institution between 1988 and 2017 and identified 15 patients (1.9%) that met International Classification of Headache Disorders criteria for ON.

Results Of the 15 ON patients, surgical approaches included 13 (87%) retrosigmoid (RS), one (7%) translabyrinthine (TL), and one (7%) combined RS + TL. Mean clinical follow-up was 119 months (11–263). Six (40%) patients obtained pain relief through conservative management, while the remaining nine (60%) underwent surgery or ablative procedure. Three (38%) patients received an external neurolysis, four (50%) received a neurectomy, one (13%) had both procedures, and one (13%) received two C2 to 3 radio frequency ablations. Of the nine patients who underwent procedural ON treatment, seven (78%) patients achieved pain relief, one patient (11%) continued to have pain, and one patient (11%) was lost to follow-up. Of the six patients whose pain was controlled with conservative management and nerve blocks, five (83%) found relief by using neuropathic pain medication and one (17%) found relief on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug.

Conclusion Our series demonstrates success with conservative management in some, but overall a minority (40%) of patients, reserving decompression only for refractory cases.

Note

Portions of this work were presented in part at the Congress of Neurological Surgeons Annual Meeting, Houston, Texas, October 6-10, 2018




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 22. April 2020

Angenommen: 03. Dezember 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
22. Februar 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany