Influence of the Head Neck Position on Imaging Measurements Used to Assess the Craniovertebral Junction in Small Breed Dogs: A Cadaveric Study

Abstract

Objective The study aimed to determine the influence of head neck position on imaging measurements used to assess the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) and to recommend the most appropriate position for the evaluation of the CVJ.

Study Design A cross-sectional sample of adult dogs' cadavers was subjected to a computed tomography scan of the cranium and the cranial cervical region in three standardized head positions. Imaging measurements often used to assess the CVJ were measured. The influence of the head neck position, breed, weight and gender on imaging measurements was tested using repeated measures analysis of variance.

Results Twenty-eight cadavers of small breed dogs were enrolled in the study. All cadavers examined had occipital dysplasia. All transarticular imaging measurements were dependent on the head neck position. In addition, the breed, weight and gender had an influence on several measurements.

Conclusion We recommend a standardized head neck position of 50 degrees flexion if quantitative imaging measurements of the CVJ are used to diagnose pathologies in this region. Future studies should focus on the definition of cut-off values for quantitative imaging measurements of the CVJ to differentiate between healthy and diseased small breed dogs. Regarding atlantoaxial instability, a combination of six parameters (C1-C2 angle, C1-C2 overlap, atlantoaxial distance, dens-to-axis length ratio, ventral compression index and clivus canal angle) is promising for its diagnosis.

Keywords

craniovertebral junction - head neck position - computed tomography - magnetic resonance imaging - small breed dogs

Authors' Contributions

B.P. and C.P. contributed to conception of the study, study design and acquisition of the data, data analysis and interpretation. F.F. contributed to the collection of the samples, conception of the study and study design. B.V. contributed to the study design, data analysis and interpretation. A.B. and A.M. contributed to the data analysis. All authors drafted, revised and approved the submitted manuscript.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 12. August 2020

Angenommen: 22. Januar 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
12. Mai 2021

• References

• 1 Stalin C, Gutierrez-Quintana R, Faller K, Guevar J, Yeamans C, Penderis J. A review of canine atlantoaxial joint subluxation. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28 (01) 1-8
• 2 Dewey CW, Marino DJ, Loughin CA. Craniocervical junction abnormalities in dogs. N Z Vet J 2013; 61 (04) 202-211
• 3 Waschk MA, Vidondo B, Carrera I. et al. Craniovertebral junction anomalies in small breed dogs with atlantoaxial instability: a multicentre case-control study. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2019; 32 (01) 33-40
• 4 Marino DJ, Loughin CA, Dewey CW. et al. Morphometric features of the craniocervical junction region in dogs with suspected Chiari-like malformation determined by combined use of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. Am J Vet Res 2012; 73 (01) 105-111
• 5 Smoker WR. Craniovertebral junction: normal anatomy, craniometry, and congenital anomalies. Radiographics 1994; 14 (02) 255-277
• 6 Rojas CA, Bertozzi JC, Martinez CR, Whitlow J. Reassessment of the craniocervical junction: normal values on CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28 (09) 1819-1823
• 7 Smoker WRK, Khanna G. Imaging the craniocervical junction. Childs Nerv Syst 2008; 24 (10) 1123-1145
• 8 Cerda-Gonzalez S, Dewey CW, Scrivani PV, Kline KL. Imaging features of atlanto-occipital overlapping in dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2009; 50 (03) 264-268
• 9 Cummings KR, Grosso FE, Moore G, Rochat MA, Thomovsky S, Bentley R. Objective measurements of the atlantoaxial joint on radiographs performed without flexion can increase the confidence of diagnosis of atlantoaxial instability in toy breed dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2018;59(06):
• 10 Pang D, Thompson DNP. Embryology and bony malformations of the craniovertebral junction. Childs Nerv Syst 2011; 27 (04) 523-564
• 11 Pang D, Thompson DNP. Embryology, classification, and surgical management of bony malformations of the craniovertebral junction. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 2014; 40: 19-109
• 12 Aydin S, Hanimoglu H, Tanriverdi T, Yentur E, Kaynar MY. Chiari type I malformations in adults: a morphometric analysis of the posterior cranial fossa. Surg Neurol 2005; 64 (03) 237-241 , discussion 241
• 13 Dagtekin A, Avci E, Kara E. et al. Posterior cranial fossa morphometry in symptomatic adult Chiari I malformation patients: comparative clinical and anatomical study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2011; 113 (05) 399-403
• 14 Upchurch JJ, McGonnell IM, Driver CJ, Butler L, Volk HA. Influence of head positioning on the assessment of Chiari-like malformation in Cavalier King Charles spaniels. Vet Rec 2011; 169 (11) 277
• 15 Schneider M, Waschk M, Precht MC. et al. Incidence of abnormalities of the second and third cervical vertebral junction in dogs with atlantoaxial instability: a multicentre study. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2017; 30 (06) 424-429
• 16 Middleton G, Hillmann DJ, Trichel J, Bragulla HH, Gaschen L. Magnetic resonance imaging of the ligamentous structures of the occipitoatlantoaxial region in the dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2012; 53 (05) 545-551
• 17 Planchamp B, Bluteau J, Stoffel MH, Precht C, Schmidli F, Forterre F. Morphometric and functional study of the canine atlantoaxial joint. Res Vet Sci 2020; 128: 76-85
• 18 Takahashi F, Hakozaki T, Kanno N, Harada Y, Yamaguchi S, Hara Y. Evaluation of the dens-to-axis length ratio and dens angle in toy-breed dogs with and without atlantoaxial instability and in healthy Beagles. Am J Vet Res 2017; 78 (12) 1400-1405
• 19 White DA, Renberg WC, Roush JK, Hallman MR, Mauler DA, Milliken GA. Flexed radiographic angles for determination of atlantoaxial instability in dogs. Vet Surg 2019; 48 (08) 1406-1415
• 20 Mitchell TJ, Knowler SP, van den Berg H, Sykes J, Rusbridge C. Syringomyelia: determining risk and protective factors in the conformation of the Cavalier King Charles Spaniel dog. Canine Genet Epidemiol 2014; 1: 9
• 21 Regodón S, Vivo JM, Franco A, Guillén MT, Robina A. Craniofacial angle in dolicho-, meso- and brachycephalic dogs: radiological determination and application. Ann Anat 1993; 175 (04) 361-363
• 22 Watson AG, de Lahunta A, Evans HE. Dorsal notch of foramen magnum due to incomplete ossification of supraoccipital bone in dogs. J Small Anim Pract 1989; 30 (12) 666-673
• 23 Kupczyńska M, Czubaj N, Barszcz K. et al. Prevalence of dorsal notch and variations in the foramen magnum shape in dogs of different breeds and morphotypes. Biologia (Bratisl) 2017; 72: 230-237