PDF herunterladen
Semin Neurol 2021; 41(06): 760-770
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1726363
Review Article

Approach to Radiculopathy

Rafid Mustafa
1   Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota
,
Narayan R. Kissoon
1   Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota
2   Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Low back pain and neck pain, often with associated radiculopathy, are two of the most common reasons for referral to the outpatient neurology clinic. A thorough clinical evaluation remains paramount in establishing an accurate diagnosis and subsequently an appropriate treatment plan. In this article, we review anatomic considerations for spondylotic radiculopathy; outline the clinical approach for the evaluation of these patients, including discussion of electrodiagnostic and imaging modalities; and address treatment options based on a stratified treatment approach.

Keywords

radiculopathy - spondylosis - neck pain - low back pain


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
26. November 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2017: With special feature on mortality. Published 2018. Accessed January 7, 2020 at: cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus17.pdf
    PubMed
  • 2 Balagué F, Mannion AF, Pellisé F, Cedraschi C. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet 2012; 379 (9814): 482-491
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Deyo RA, Weinstein JN. Low back pain. N Engl J Med 2001; 344 (05) 363-370
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Martin BI, Deyo RA, Mirza SK. et al. Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems. JAMA 2008; 299 (06) 656-664
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Burke JF, Skolarus LE, Callaghan BC, Kerber KA. Choosing wisely: highest-cost tests in outpatient neurology. Ann Neurol 2013; 73 (05) 679-683
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Katz JN. Lumbar disc disorders and low-back pain: socioeconomic factors and consequences. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (Suppl. 02) 21-24
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Martin BI, Turner JA, Mirza SK, Lee MJ, Comstock BA, Deyo RA. Trends in health care expenditures, utilization, and health status among US adults with spine problems, 1997-2006. Spine 2009; 34 (19) 2077-2084
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Luo X, Pietrobon R, Sun SX, Liu GG, Hey L. Estimates and patterns of direct health care expenditures among individuals with back pain in the United States. Spine 2004; 29 (01) 79-86
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2015; 386 (9995): 743-800
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Daroff RB, Bradley WG. Bradley's Neurology in Clinical Practice. 6th ed.. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier/Saunders; 2012
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Tarulli AW, Raynor EM. Lumbosacral radiculopathy. Neurol Clin 2007; 25 (02) 387-405
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Radhakrishnan K, Litchy WJ, O'Fallon WM, Kurland LT. Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy. A population-based study from Rochester, Minnesota, 1976 through 1990. Brain 1994; 117 (Pt 2): 325-335
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Harnsberger HR, Macdonald AJ. Diagnostic and Surgical Imaging Anatomy: Brain, Head & Neck, Spine. 1st ed.. Salt Lake City: Amirsys; 2006
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Watson J. Office evaluation of spine and limb pain: spondylotic radiculopathy and other nonstructural mimickers. Semin Neurol 2011; 31 (01) 85-101
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Apazidis A, Ricart PA, Diefenbach CM, Spivak JM. The prevalence of transitional vertebrae in the lumbar spine. Spine J 2011; 11 (09) 858-862
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Bartleson JD, Deen HG. Spine Disorders: Medical and Surgical Management. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press; 2009
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Hooten WM, Cohen SP. Evaluation and treatment of low back pain: a clinically focused review for primary care specialists. Mayo Clin Proc 2015; 90 (12) 1699-1718
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Vroomen PC, de Krom MC, Wilmink JT, Kester AD, Knottnerus JA. Diagnostic value of history and physical examination in patients suspected of lumbosacral nerve root compression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 72 (05) 630-634
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Bouhassira D, Attal N, Fermanian J. et al. Development and validation of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory. Pain 2004; 108 (03) 248-257
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Krause SJ, Backonja MM. Development of a neuropathic pain questionnaire. Clin J Pain 2003; 19 (05) 306-314
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Galer BS, Jensen MP. Development and preliminary validation of a pain measure specific to neuropathic pain: the Neuropathic Pain Scale. Neurology 1997; 48 (02) 332-338
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Bennett M. The LANSS Pain Scale: the Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs. Pain 2001; 92 (1-2): 147-157
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Henschke N, Maher CG, Refshauge KM. et al. Prevalence of and screening for serious spinal pathology in patients presenting to primary care settings with acute low back pain. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 60 (10) 3072-3080
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Chou R, Qaseem A, Owens DK, Shekelle P. Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. Diagnostic imaging for low back pain: advice for high-value health care from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2011; 154 (03) 181-189
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Fukui S, Ohseto K, Shiotani M, Ohno K, Karasawa H, Naganuma Y. Distribution of referred pain from the lumbar zygapophyseal joints and dorsal rami. Clin J Pain 1997; 13 (04) 303-307
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Katz JN, Harris MB. Clinical practice. Lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 2008; 358 (08) 818-825
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Shabat S, Leitner Y, David R, Folman Y. The correlation between Spurling test and imaging studies in detecting cervical radiculopathy. J Neuroimaging 2012; 22 (04) 375-378
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Wainner RS, Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ, Boninger ML, Delitto A, Allison S. Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of the clinical examination and patient self-report measures for cervical radiculopathy. Spine 2003; 28 (01) 52-62
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Devillé WL, van der Windt DA, Dzaferagić A, Bezemer PD, Bouter LM. The test of Lasègue: systematic review of the accuracy in diagnosing herniated discs. Spine 2000; 25 (09) 1140-1147
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Homayouni K, Jafari SH, Yari H. Sensitivity and specificity of modified Bragard test in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy using electrodiagnosis as a reference standard. J Chiropr Med 2018; 17 (01) 36-43
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Suri P, Rainville J, Katz JN. et al. The accuracy of the physical examination for the diagnosis of midlumbar and low lumbar nerve root impingement. Spine 2011; 36 (01) 63-73
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Stuber K, Lerede C, Kristmanson K, Sajko S, Bruno P. The diagnostic accuracy of the Kemp's test: a systematic review. J Can Chiropr Assoc 2014; 58 (03) 258-267
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Dyck P, Doyle Jr JB. “Bicycle test” of van Gelderen in diagnosis of intermittent cauda equina compression syndrome. Case report. J Neurosurg 1977; 46 (05) 667-670
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Dong G, Porter RW. Walking and cycling tests in neurogenic and intermittent claudication. Spine 1989; 14 (09) 965-969
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Szadek KM, van der Wurff P, van Tulder MW, Zuurmond WW, Perez RS. Diagnostic validity of criteria for sacroiliac joint pain: a systematic review. J Pain 2009; 10 (04) 354-368
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Brinjikji W, Luetmer PH, Comstock B. et al. Systematic literature review of imaging features of spinal degeneration in asymptomatic populations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015; 36 (04) 811-816
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Chou R, Fu R, Carrino JA, Deyo RA. Imaging strategies for low-back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2009; 373 (9662): 463-472
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Sandoval AE. Electrodiagnostics for low back pain. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2010; 21 (04) 767-776
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Haig AJ, Tzeng HM, LeBreck DB. The value of electrodiagnostic consultation for patients with upper extremity nerve complaints: a prospective comparison with the history and physical examination. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80 (10) 1273-1281
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Chou R, Qaseem A, Snow V. et al; Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee of the American College of Physicians, American College of Physicians, American Pain Society Low Back Pain Guidelines Panel. Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147 (07) 478-491
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 41 Chou R, Huffman LH. American Pain Society, American College of Physicians. Medications for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147 (07) 505-514
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Goldberg H, Firtch W, Tyburski M. et al. Oral steroids for acute radiculopathy due to a herniated lumbar disk: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015; 313 (19) 1915-1923
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 43 Dworkin RH, O'Connor AB, Audette J. et al. Recommendations for the pharmacological management of neuropathic pain: an overview and literature update. Mayo Clin Proc 2010; 85 (3, Suppl): S3-S14
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 44 Chou R, Hashimoto R, Friedly J. et al. Epidural corticosteroid injections for radiculopathy and spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2015; 163 (05) 373-381
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 45 Cohen SP, Bicket MC, Jamison D, Wilkinson I, Rathmell JP. Epidural steroids: a comprehensive, evidence-based review. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2013; 38 (03) 175-200
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 46 Chou R, Loeser JD, Owens DK. et al; American Pain Society Low Back Pain Guideline Panel. Interventional therapies, surgery, and interdisciplinary rehabilitation for low back pain: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline from the American Pain Society. Spine 2009; 34 (10) 1066-1077
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 47 Boswell MV, Trescot AM, Datta S. et al; American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians. Interventional techniques: evidence-based practice guidelines in the management of chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician 2007; 10 (01) 7-111
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 48 Armon C, Argoff CE, Samuels J, Backonja MM. Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Assessment: use of epidural steroid injections to treat radicular lumbosacral pain: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2007; 68 (10) 723-729
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 49 Patel N. Twelve-month follow-up of a randomized trial assessing cooled radiofrequency denervation as a treatment for sacroiliac region pain. Pain Pract 2016; 16 (02) 154-167
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 50 Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Tosteson AN. et al. Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: eight-year results for the spine patient outcomes research trial. Spine 2014; 39 (01) 3-16
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 51 Chou R, Baisden J, Carragee EJ, Resnick DK, Shaffer WO, Loeser JD. Surgery for low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Spine 2009; 34 (10) 1094-1109
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 52 Kovacs FM, Urrútia G, Alarcón JD. Surgery versus conservative treatment for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Spine 2011; 36 (20) E1335-E1351
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 53 Lurie J, Tomkins-Lane C. Management of lumbar spinal stenosis. BMJ 2016; 352: h6234
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 54 Mekhail N, Costandi S, Abraham B, Samuel SW. Functional and patient-reported outcomes in symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis following percutaneous decompression. Pain Pract 2012; 12 (06) 417-425
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 55 Deer TR, Grider JS, Pope JE. et al. The MIST guidelines: The Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Consensus Group Guidelines for minimally invasive spine treatment. Pain Pract 2019; 19 (03) 250-274
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 56 Patel VV, Whang PG, Haley TR. et al. Superion interspinous process spacer for intermittent neurogenic claudication secondary to moderate lumbar spinal stenosis: two-year results from a randomized controlled FDA-IDE pivotal trial. Spine 2015; 40 (05) 275-282
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar