Download PDF
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2022; 83(S 02): e474-e483
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731034
Original Article

Comparison of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach and Lateral Microsurgical Infratemporal Fossa Approach to the Jugular Foramen: An Anatomical Study

Jianfeng Liu
1   Department of Otolaryngology, China–Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
2   Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Carlos D. Pinheiro-Neto
3   Division of Otolaryngology and Head–Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, United States
,
Dazhang Yang
1   Department of Otolaryngology, China–Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
,
Eric Wang
2   Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Paul A. Gardner
4   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Barry E. Hirsch
2   Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Carl H. Snyderman
2   Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Juan C. Fernandez-Miranda
5   Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The jugular foramen is one of the most challenging surgical regions in skull base surgery. With the development of endoscopic techniques, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has been undertaken to treat some lesions in this area independently or combined with open approaches. The purpose of the current study is to describe the anatomical steps and landmarks for the EEA to the jugular foramen and to compare it with the degree of exposure obtained with the lateral infratemporal fossa approach.

Materials and Methods A total of 15 osseous structures related to the jugular foramen were measured in 33 adult dry skulls. Three silicone-injected adult cadaveric heads (six sides) were dissected for EEA and three heads (six sides) were used for a lateral infratemporal fossa approach (Fisch type A). The jugular foramen was exposed, relevant landmarks were demonstrated, and the distances between relevant landmarks and the jugular foramen were obtained. High-quality pictures were obtained.

Results The jugular foramen was accessed in all dissections by using either approach. Important anatomical landmarks for EEA include internal carotid artery (ICA), petroclival fissure, inferior petrosal sinus, jugular tubercle, and hypoglossal canal. The EEA exposed the anterior and medial parts of the jugular foramen, while the lateral infratemporal fossa approach (Fisch type A) exposed the lateral and posterior parts of the jugular foramen. With EEA, dissection and transposition of the facial nerve was avoided, but the upper parapharyngeal and paraclival ICA may need to be mobilized to adequately expose the jugular foramen.

Conclusion The EEA to the jugular foramen is anatomically feasible but requires mobilization of the ICA to provide access to the anterior and medial aspects of the jugular foramen. The lateral infratemporal approach requires facial nerve transposition to provide access to the lateral and posterior parts of the jugular foramen. A deep understanding of the complex anatomy of this region is paramount for safe and effective surgery of the jugular foramen. Both techniques may be complementary considering the different regions of the jugular foramen accessed with each approach.

Keywords

jugular foramen - internal carotid artery - infratemporal fossa - endoscopic - endonasal - microscopic - skull base surgery

Note

This study has been presented at 26th Annual Meeting North American Skull Base Society at Fairmont Scottsdale Princess Scottsdale, Arizona, on February 12–14, 2016.




Publication History

Received: 04 December 2020

Accepted: 07 May 2021

Article published online:
05 July 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Griessenauer CJ, McGrew B, Matusz P, De Caro R, Loukas M, Tubbs RS. Surgical approaches to the jugular foramen: a comprehensive review. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2016; 77 (03) 260-264
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Rhoton Jr AL. Jugular foramen. Neurosurgery 2000; 47 (3, Suppl): S267-S285
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Constanzo F, Coelho Neto M, Nogueira GF, Ramina R. Microsurgical anatomy of the jugular foramen applied to surgery of glomus jugulare via craniocervical approach. Front Surg 2020; 7: 27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Ramina R, Maniglia JJ, Fernandes YB, Paschoal JR, Pfeilsticker LN, Coelho Neto M. Tumors of the jugular foramen: diagnosis and management. Neurosurgery 2005; 57 (1, Suppl): 59-68
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Luzzi S, Giotta Lucifero A, Del Maestro M. et al. Anterolateral approach for retrostyloid superior parapharyngeal space schwannomas involving the jugular foramen area: a 20-year experience. World Neurosurg 2019; 132: e40-e52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Vaz-Guimaraes F, Nakassa ACI, Gardner PA, Wang EW, Snyderman CH, Fernandez-Miranda JC. Endoscopic endonasal approach to the ventral jugular foramen: anatomical basis, technical considerations, and clinical series. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2017; 13 (04) 482-491
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 de Lara D, Ditzel Filho LF, Prevedello DM. et al. Endonasal endoscopic approaches to the paramedian skull base. World Neurosurg 2014; 82 (6, Suppl): S121-S129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Zhang Q, Lv H, Wang Z, Guo H, Li M. Endoscopic transoral approach for extracranial hypoglossal schwannoma. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2011; 73 (05) 282-286
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Zimmer LA, Hirsch BE, Kassam A, Horowitz M, Snyderman CH. Resection of a recurrent paraganglioma via an endoscopic transnasal approach to the jugular fossa. Otology & neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society. European Academy of Otology and Neurotology 2006; 27: 398-402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Fernandez-Miranda JC, Morera VA, Snyderman CH, Gardner P. Endoscopic endonasal transclival approach to the jugular tubercle. Neurosurgery 2012; 71 (1, Suppl Operative): 146-158
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Taniguchi M, Kato A, Taki T. et al. Endoscope assisted removal of jugular foramen schwannoma; report of 3 cases. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2005; 48 (06) 365-368
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Samii M, Alimohamadi M, Gerganov V. Endoscope-assisted retrosigmoid infralabyrinthine approach to jugular foramen tumors. J Neurosurg 2016; 124 (04) 1061-1067
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Lee DL, McCoul ED, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic endonasal access to the jugular foramen: defining the surgical approach. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2012; 73 (05) 342-351
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Dallan I, Bignami M, Battaglia P, Castelnuovo P, Tschabitscher M. Fully endoscopic transnasal approach to the jugular foramen: anatomic study and clinical considerations. Neurosurgery 2010; 67 (3, Suppl Operative): ons1-ons7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Komune N, Komune S, Matsushima K, Rhoton Jr AL. Comparison of lateral microsurgical preauricular and anterior endoscopic approaches to the jugular foramen. J Laryngol Otol 2015; 129 (Suppl. 02) S12-S20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Zhang X, Tabani H, El-Sayed I. et al. Combined endoscopic transoral and endonasal approach to the jugular foramen: a multiportal expanded access to the clivus. World Neurosurg 2016; 95: 62-70
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Liu J, Pinheiro-Neto CD, Fernandez-Miranda JC. et al. Eustachian tube and internal carotid artery in skull base surgery: an anatomical study. Laryngoscope 2014; 124 (12) 2655-2664
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Wang WH, Lieber S, Mathias RN. et al. The foramen lacerum: surgical anatomy and relevance for endoscopic endonasal approaches. J Neurosurg 2018; 1-12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Fisch U, Fagan P, Valavanis A. The infratemporal fossa approach for the lateral skull base. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1984; 17 (03) 513-552
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Wang M, Chae R, Shehata Joseph. et al. Comparative analysis of the subtonsillar, far-lateral, extreme-lateral, and endoscopic far-medial approaches to the lower clivus: an anatomical cadaver study. World Neurosurg 2019; 127: e1083-e1096
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Simal-Julián JA, Miranda-Lloret P, Beltrán-Giner A, Plaza-Ramirez E, Botella-Asunción C. Full endoscopic endonasal extreme far-medial approach: eustachian tube transposition. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2013; 11 (05) 584-590
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Goldenberg RA. Surgeon's view of the skull base from the lateral approach. Laryngoscope 1984; 94 (12 Pt 2): (Suppl. 36) 1-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Roche PH, Mercier P, Sameshima T, Fournier HD. Surgical anatomy of the jugular foramen. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 2008; 33: 233-263
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Katsuta T, Rhoton Jr AL, Matsushima T. The jugular foramen: microsurgical anatomy and operative approaches. Neurosurgery 1997; 41 (01) 149-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Jacquesson T, Berhouma M, Tringali S, Simon E, Jouanneau E. Which routes for petroclival tumors? A comparison between the anterior expanded endoscopic endonasal approach and lateral or posterior routes. World Neurosurg 2015; 83 (06) 929-936
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Patel CR, Wang EW, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH. Contralateral transmaxillary corridor: an augmented endoscopic approach to the petrous apex. J Neurosurg 2018; 129 (01) 211-219
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Pensak ML, Jackler RK. Removal of jugular foramen tumors: the fallopian bridge technique. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 117 (06) 586-591
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar