Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2022; 35(01): 033-046
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735551
Original Research

Influence of Screw-Hole Defect Size on the Biomechanical Properties of Feline Femora in an Ex Vivo Model

QiCai Jason Hoon 
1   Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
,
Tian Wang
2   Surgical and Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
,
Evelyn Hall
1   Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
,
William R. Walsh 
2   Surgical and Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
,
Kenneth A. Johnson 
1   Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
› Author Affiliations
Funding This work was supported by the Sydney University clinical residency research programme.
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The study aims to evaluate the biomechanical properties of feline femora with craniocaudal screw-hole defects of increasing diameter, subjected to three-point bending and torsion to failure at two different loading rates.

Study Design Eighty femoral pairs were harvested from adult cat cadavers. For each bending and torsional experiment, there were five groups (n = 8 pairs) of increasing craniocaudal screw-hole defects (intact, 1.5 mm, 2.0 mm, 2.4 mm, 2.7mm). Mid-diaphyseal bicortical defects were created with an appropriate pilot drill-hole and tapped accordingly. Left and right femora of each pair were randomly assigned to a destructive loading protocol at low (10 mm/min; 0.5 degrees/s) or high rates (3,000 mm/min; 90 degrees/s) respectively. Stiffness, load/torque-to-failure, energy-to-failure and fracture morphology were recorded.

Results Defect size to bone diameter ratio was significantly different between defect groups within bending and torsional experiments respectively (intact [0%; 0%], 1.5 mm [17.8%; 17.1%], 2.0 mm [22.8%; 23.5%], 2.4 mm [27.8%; 27.6%], 2.7 mm [31.1%; 32.4%]) (p < 0.001). No significant differences in stiffness and load/torque-to-failure were noted with increasing deficit sizes in all loading conditions. Screw-hole (2.7 mm) defects up to 33% bone diameter had a maximum of 20% reduction in bending and torsional strength compared with intact bone at both loading rates. Stiffness and load/torque-to-failure in both bending and torsion were increased in bones subjected to higher loading rates (p < 0.001).

Conclusion Screw-hole defects up to 2.7 mm did not significantly reduce feline bone failure properties in this ex vivo femoral study. These findings support current screw-size selection guidelines of up to 33% bone diameter as appropriate for use in feline fracture osteosynthesis.

Keywords

screw-hole - feline femora - defect size - torsion - three-point bending

Note

The study has been presented as a scientific abstract at the European College of Veterinary Surgeons Virtual Resident's Forum 2020: Small Animal Orthopaedics.


Authors' Contribution

Q.J.H. and T.W. contributed to the study conception, study design, acquisition of data and data analysis and interpretation. E.H. contributed to the statistical data analysis and interpretation. K.J. and W.W. contributed to the study conception, study design, data analysis and interpretation. All authors drafted, revised and approved the manuscript prior to submission.




Publication History

Received: 10 November 2020

Accepted: 27 July 2021

Article published online:
06 September 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Schrader SC. Orthopedic surgery. In: Sherding RG. ed. The Cat: Diseases and Clinical Management. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1994: 1649-1709
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Voss K, Montavon PM. Fractures. In: Montavon PM, Voss K, Langley-Hobbs SJ. eds. Feline Orthopedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Disease. London: Saunders Elsevier; 2009: 129-152
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 DeCamp CE, Johnston SA, Dejardin LM, Schaefer SL. Brinker, Piermattei and Flo's Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair. 5th edition.. Missouri: Elsevier Inc.; 2016: 24-152
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Gibson TWG, Moens NMM, Runciman RJ, Holmberg DL, Monteith GM. The biomechanical properties of the feline femur. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21 (04) 312-317
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Edgerton BC, An KN, Morrey BF. Torsional strength reduction due to cortical defects in bone. J Orthop Res 1990; 8 (06) 851-855
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Ho KWK, Gilbody J, Jameson T, Miles AW. The effect of 4 mm bicortical drill hole defect on bone strength in a pig femur model. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2010; 130 (06) 797-802
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Burchardt H, Busbee III GA, Enneking WF. Repair of experimental autologous grafts of cortical bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1975; 57 (06) 814-819
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Massie AM, Kapatkin AS, Garcia TC, Guzman DSM, Chou PY, Stover SM. Effects of hole diameter on torsional mechanical properties of the rabbit femur. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2019; 32 (01) 51-58
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Eglseder WA. Principles of fixation. In: Eglseder WA. ed. Atlas of Upper Extremity Trauma: A Clinical Perspective. New York: Springer International Publishing; 2018: 17-31
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Wang X, Mabrey JD, Agrawal CM. An interspecies comparison of bone fracture properties. Biomed Mater Eng 1998; 8 (01) 1-9
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Marturello DM, Wei F, Déjardin LM. Characterization of the torsional structural properties of feline femurs and surrogate bone models for mechanical testing of orthopedic implants. Vet Surg 2019; 48 (02) 229-236
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Shah KM, Goh JC, Karunanithy R, Low SL, Das De S, Bose K. Effect of decalcification on bone mineral content and bending strength of feline femur. Calcif Tissue Int 1995; 56 (01) 78-82
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Norrdin RW, Simske SJ, Gaarde S, Schwardt JD, Thrall MA. Bone changes in mucopolysaccharidosis VI in cats and the effects of bone marrow transplantation: mechanical testing of long bones. Bone 1995; 17 (05) 485-489
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Ayers RA, Miller MR, Simske SJ, Norrdin RW. Correlation of flexural structural properties with bone physical properties: a four species survey. Biomed Sci Instrum 1996; 32: 251-260
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Alford JW, Bradley MP, Fadale PD, Crisco JJ, Moore DC, Ehrlich MG. Resorbable fillers reduce stress risers from empty screw holes. J Trauma 2007; 63 (03) 647-654
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Brooks DB, Burstein AH, Frankel VH. The biomechanics of torsional fractures. The stress concentration effect of a drill hole. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1970; 52 (03) 507-514
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Johnson BA, Fallat LM. The effect of screw holes on bone strength. J Foot Ankle Surg 1997; 36 (06) 446-451
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Olcay E, Allahverd İE, Gülmez T, Olgun ErdİKmen D, Ermutlu CŞ, Mutlu Z. Evaluation of the effects of holes of various sizes on fracture rates in sheep femurs. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 2013; 19 (Suppl-A): A49-A53
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Schnabl E, Bockstahler B. Systematic review of ground reaction force measurements in cats. Vet J 2015; 206 (01) 83-90
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Zhang Z, Yu H, Yang J, Wang L, Yang L. How cat lands: insights into contribution of the forelimbs and hindlimbs to attenuating impact force. Chin Sci Bull 2014; 59 (26) 3325-3332
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Bertocci G, Thompson A, Pierce MC. Femur fracture biomechanics and morphology associated with torsional and bending loading conditions in an in vitro immature porcine model. J Forensic Leg Med 2017; 52: 5-11
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 An YH, Draughn RA. Mechanical Testing of Bone and the Bone-implant Interface. Florida: CRC Press; 2000: 3-348
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 23 Kulin RM, Jiang F, Vecchio KS. Effects of age and loading rate on equine cortical bone failure. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2011; 4 (01) 57-75
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Zdero R, Shah S, Mosli M, Schemitsch EH. The effect of load application rate on the biomechanics of synthetic femurs. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2010; 224 (4, H4): 599-605
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Kirchner H. Ductility and brittleness of bone. Int J Fract 2006; 139 (03) 509-516
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Silva P, Rosa RC, Shimano AC, Defino HLA. Effect of pilot hole on biomechanical and in vivo pedicle screw-bone interface. Eur Spine J 2013; 22 (08) 1829-1836
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Hipp JA, Edgerton BC, An KN, Hayes WC. Structural consequences of transcortical holes in long bones loaded in torsion. J Biomech 1990; 23 (12) 1261-1268
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Marturello DM, von Pfeil DJF, Déjardin LM. Mechanical comparison of two small interlocking nails in torsion using a feline bone surrogate. Vet Surg 2020; 49 (02) 380-389
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Donnelly E. Methods for assessing bone quality: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469 (08) 2128-2138
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Lauten SD, Cox NR, Baker GH, Painter DJ, Morrison NE, Baker HJ. Body composition of growing and adult cats as measured by use of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Comp Med 2000; 50 (02) 175-183
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Kim Y-S, Han J-J, Lee J, Choi HS, Kim JH, Lee T. The correlation between bone mineral density/trabecular bone score and body mass index, height, and weight. Osteoporos Sarcopenia 2017; 3 (02) 98-103
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Fox MJ, Scarvell JM, Smith PN, Kalyanasundaram S, Stachurski ZH. Lateral drill holes decrease strength of the femur: an observational study using finite element and experimental analyses. J Orthop Surg Res 2013; 8: 29
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 El-Ghazali HM, El-Behery EI. Comparative morphological interpretations on the bones of the pelvic limb of New Zealand rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and domestic cat (Felis domestica). J Adv Vet Anim Res 2018; 5 (04) 410-419
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Steiner M, Volkheimer D, Meyers N. et al. Comparison between different methods for biomechanical assessment of ex vivo fracture callus stiffness in small animal bone healing studies. PLoS One 2015; 10 (03) e0119603-e0119603
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Sebastiani A, Fishbeck DW. Mammalian anatomy: The Cat. 2nd edition.. Colorado: Morton Publishing Company; 2005: 15-50
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 36 Belill KA, Settle TL, Angel CR, Kim S-W, Rothwell SW. Femoral strength after induced lesions in rats (Rattus norvegicus). Comp Med 2014; 64 (03) 186-192
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Kuroiwa Y, Niikura T, Lee SY. et al. Escherichia coli-derived BMP-2-absorbed β-TCP granules induce bone regeneration in rabbit critical-sized femoral segmental defects. Int Orthop 2019; 43 (05) 1247-1253
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Kang Q, An YH, Friedman RJ. Effects of multiple freezing-thawing cycles on ultimate indentation load and stiffness of bovine cancellous bone. Am J Vet Res 1997; 58 (10) 1171-1173
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 van Haaren EH, van der Zwaard BC, van der Veen AJ, Heyligers IC, Wuisman PI, Smit TH. Effect of long-term preservation on the mechanical properties of cortical bone in goats. Acta Orthop 2008; 79 (05) 708-716
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Santello M. Review of motor control mechanisms underlying impact absorption from falls. Gait Posture 2005; 21 (01) 85-94
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar