Hill classification is superior to the axial length of a hiatal hernia for assessment of the mechanical anti-reflux barrier at the gastroesophageal junction

Background and study aims: The pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is multifactorial, including the mechanical anti-reflux barrier of the gastroesophageal junction. This barrier can be evaluated endoscopically in two ways: by measuring the axial length of any hiatal hernia present or by assessing the gastroesophageal flap valve. The endoscopic measurement of axial length is troublesome because of the physiological dynamics in the area. Grading the gastroesophageal flap valve is easier and has proven reproducible. The aim of the present study was to compare the two endoscopic grading methods with regard to associations with GERD.

Patients and methods: Population-based subjects underwent endoscopic examination assessing the axial length of hiatus hernia, the gastroesophageal flap valve using the Hill classification, esophagitis using the Los Angeles (LA) classification, and columnar metaplasia using the Z-line appearance (ZAP) classification. Biopsies were taken from the squamocolumnar junction to assess the presence of intestinal metaplasia. Symptoms were recorded with the validated Abdominal Symptom Questionnaire. GERD was defined according to the Montreal definition.

Results: In total, 334 subjects were included in the study and underwent endoscopy; 86 subjects suffered from GERD and 211 presented no symptoms or signs of GERD. Based on logistic regression, the estimated area under the curve statistic (AUC) for Hill (0.65 [95 %CI 0.59 – 0.72]) was higher than the corresponding estimate for the axial length of a hiatal hernia (0.61 [95 %CI 0.54 – 0.68]), although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.225).

Conclusion: From our data, and in terms of association with GERD, the Hill classification was slightly stronger compared to the axial length of a hiatal hernia, but we could not verify that the Hill classification was superior as a predictor. The Hill classification may replace the axial length of a hiatal hernia in the endoscopic assessment of the mechanical anti-reflux barrier of the gastroesophageal junction.

• References

• 1 Dent J. Epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut 2005; 54: 710-717
• 2 Gordon C, Kang JY, Neild PJ et al. The role of the hiatus hernia in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004; 20: 719-732
• 3 Vakil NB, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas PJ et al. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 1900-1920
• 4 Estores D, Velanovich V. Barrett esophagus: epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Curr Probl Surg 2013; 50: 192-226
• 5 Kahrilas PJ, Kim HC, Pandolfino JE. Approaches to the diagnosis and grading of hiatal hernia. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2008; 22: 601-616
• 6 Mittal RK. Hiatal hernia: myth or reality?. Am J Med 1997; 103: 33S-39S
• 7 Oberg S, Peters JH, DeMeester TR et al. Endoscopic grading of the gastroesophageal valve in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Surg Endosc 1999; 13: 1184-1188
• 8 Kim GH, Kang DH, Song GA et al. Gastroesophageal flap valve is associated with gastroesophageal and gastropharyngeal reflux. J Gastroenterol 2006; 41: 654-661
• 9 Kahrilas PJ, Shi G, Manka M et al. Increased frequency of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation induced by gastric distention in reflux patients with hiatal hernia. Gastroenterology 2000; 118: 688-695
• 10 Sgouros S, Mpakos D, Rodias M et al. Prevalence and axial length of hiatus hernia in patients, with nonerosive reflux disease: a prospective study. J Clin Gastroenterol 2007; 41: 814
• 11 Wallner B. Endoscopically defined gastroesophageal junction coincides with the anatomical gastroesophageal junction. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 2155-2158
• 12 Guda N, Partington S, Vakil NB. Inter- and intra-observer variability in the measurement of length at endoscopy: Implications for the measurement of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 655-658
• 13 Hill LD, Kozarek RA, Kraemer SJM et al. The gastroesophageal flap valve: in vitro and in vivo observations. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 541-547
• 14 Koch OO, Spaun G, Antoniou SA et al. Endoscopic grading of the gastroesophageal flap valve is correlated with reflux activity and can predict the size of the esophageal hiatus in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 4590-4595
• 15 Navarathne NMM, Abeysuriya V, Ileperuma A et al. Endoscopic observations around the gastroesophageal junction in patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease in South Asia. Indian J Gastroenterol 2010; 29: 184-186
• 16 Cheong JH, Kim GH, Lee BE et al. Endoscopic grading of gastroesophageal flap valve helps predict proton pump inhibitor response in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 2011; 46: 789-796
• 17 Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR et al. Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut 1999; 45: 172-180
• 18 Wallner B, Sylvan A, Stenling R et al. The esophageal Z-line appearance correlates to the prevalence of intestinal metaplasia. Scand J Gastroenterol 2000; 35: 17-22
• 19 Wallner B, Sylvan A, Stenling R et al. The Z-line appearance and prevalence of intestinal metaplasia among patients without symptoms or endoscopical signs indicating gastroesophageal reflux. Surg Endosc 2001; 15: 886-889
• 20 Wallner B, Sylvan A, Janunger K-G. Endoscopic assessment of the “Z-line” (squamocolumnar junction) appearance: reproducibility of the ZAP classification among endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 65-69
• 21 Agréus L, Hellström PM, Wallner B et al. Towards a healthy stomach? – H. pylori prevalence has dramatically decreased over 23 years in adults in a Swedish community. Helicobacter submitted
• 22 Agréus L, Svärdsudd K, Nyren O et al. Reproducibility and validity of a postal questionnaire. The abdominal symptom study. Scand J Prim Health Care 1993; 11: 252-262
• 23 Boyce H. The normal anatomy around the oesophagogastric junction: an endoscopic view. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2008; 22: 553-567
• 24 Ronkainen J, Aro P, Storskrubb T et al. Gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms and health-related quality of life in the adult general population – the Kalixanda study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 23: 1725-1733