Open Access
Endosc Int Open 2016; 04(07): E820-E827
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-107789
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Bowel preparation in pediatric colonoscopy: results of an open observational study

Thomas Berger
1   Vestische Kinder- und Jugendklinik Datteln, University of Witten-Herdecke, Datteln, Germany
,
Martin Classen
2   Department of Child and Adolescent Medicine, Klinikum Links der Weser, Bremen, Germany
,
Harald Engelhardt
3   Kinderkrankenhaus Sankt Marien, Landshut, Germany
,
Klaus-Michael Keller
4   Division of Child and Adolescent Medicine, Deutsche Klinik für Diagnostik, Wiesbaden, Germany
,
Martin W. Laass
5   Department of Child and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
,
Ralph Melchior
6   Praxis für Kinder und Jugendliche, Kassel, Germany
,
Carsten Posovszky
7   Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany
,
Burkhard Rodeck
8   Christliches Kinderhospital, Osnabrück, Germany
,
Katharina Schaper
9   Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Witten-Herdecke, Witten, Germany
,
Rolf Behrens
10   Department of Newborn, Child and Adolescent Medicine, Klinikum Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted: 08 April 2015

accepted after revision: 25 April 2016

Publication Date:
02 June 2016 (online)

Preview

Background and study aims: The goal of this study was to analyze the bowel cleansing methods currently used for pediatric colonoscopy in terms of effectiveness, tolerance and safety.

Patients and methods: Data from 768 colonoscopies reported by 28 centers were registered in an online database for further analysis. Binary logistic regression was used to determine how preparation methods affected the cleaning effect (Aronchick score) and the rate of adverse events (Aes) and complications.

Results: The most frequently reported cleansing agents were sodium picosulphate (54.2 %) and polyethylene-glycol (41.3 %) in various combinations. The cleaning effect was good to excellent in 72.6 % of patients. AEs during the preparation period occurred in 21.5 % of patients. Complications during endoscopy were reported in 12.1 % and were mostly mild. The different agents had no influence on the cleaning effect. In contrast the risk of AEs during preparation was significantly increased when polyethylene-glycol was used (odds ratio (OR) 2.112, P = 0.002) but reduced with the use of sodium picosulphate (OR 0.380, P < 0.001). In particular, the risk of needing a nasogastric tube to complete clean-out was about 10-fold higher when polyethylene-glycol was used.

Conclusions: A large variety of regimens are used for bowel preparation in children. We found a good overall cleaning result independent of the agents used. Cleansing agents, on the other hand, had a significant influence on tolerance and safety.

* academic centers