Endosc Int Open 2016; 04(08): E859-E864
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-109170
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma as a shielding technique after endoscopic mucosal resection in rat and porcine models

Vicente Lorenzo-Zúñiga
1   Endoscopy Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
2   Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Barcelona, Spain
,
Jaume Boix
1   Endoscopy Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
2   Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Barcelona, Spain
,
Vicente Moreno de Vega
1   Endoscopy Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
2   Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Barcelona, Spain
,
Ignacio Bon
1   Endoscopy Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
,
Ingrid Marín
1   Endoscopy Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
,
Ramón Bartolí
2   Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Barcelona, Spain
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted10 March 2016

accepted after revision23 May 2016

Publication Date:
10 August 2016 (online)

Background and study aims: The aims were to assess the efficacy of endoscopic application of Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) to prevent delayed perforation and to induce mucosal healing after endoscopic resections.

Patients and methods: Colonic induced lesions were performed in rats (n = 16) and pigs (n = 4). Animals were randomized to receive onto the lesions saline (control) or PRP. Animals underwent endoscopic follow-up. Thermal injury was assessed with a 1 – 4 scale: (1) mucosal necrosis; (2) submucosal necrosis; (3) muscularis propria necrosis; and (4) serosal necrosis

Results: Saline treatment showed 50 % of mortality in rats (P = 0.02). Mean ulcerated area after 48 hours and 7 days was significantly smaller with PRP than with saline (0.27 ± 0.02 cm2 and 0.08 ± 0.01 cm2 vs. 0.56 ± 0.1 cm2 and 0.40 ± 0.06 cm2; P < 0.001). The incidence of thermal injury was significantly lower with PRP (1.25 ± 0.46) than in controls (2.25 ± 0.50); P = 0.006. The porcine model showed a trend toward higher mucosal restoration in animals treated with PRP than with saline at weeks 1 and 2 (Median area in cm2: 0.55 and 0.40 vs. 1.32 and 0.79)

Conclusions: Application of PRP to colonic mucosal lesions showed strong healing properties in rat and porcine models.

 
  • References

  • 1 Paspatis GA, Dumonceau JM, Barthet M et al. Diagnosis and management of iatrogenic endoscopic perforations: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 693-711
  • 2 Tsuji Y, Ohata K, Gunji T et al. Endoscopic tissue shielding method with polyglycolic acid sheets and fibrin glue to cover wounds after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 151-155
  • 3 Zhang QS, Han B, Xu JH et al. Clip closure of defect after endoscopic resection in patients with larger colorectal tumors decreased the adverse events. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82: 904-905
  • 4 Marx RE. Platelet-rich plasma: evidence to support its use. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 62: 489-496
  • 5 Zhou B, Ren J, Ding C et al. Rapidly in situ forming platelet-rich plasma gel enhances angiogenic responses and augments early wound healing after open abdomen. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2013; 926764
  • 6 Lorenzo-Zúñiga V, Boix J, Moreno-de-Vega V et al. Microperforation of the colon: animal model in rats to reproduce mucosal thermal damage. J Surg Res 2014; 188: 415-418
  • 7 Bartoli R, Boix G, Òdena G et al. Colonoscopy in rats: An endoscopic, histological and tomographic study. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 5: 226-230
  • 8 Takimoto K, Toyonaga T, Matsuyama K. Endoscopic tissue shielding to prevent delayed perforation associated with endoscopic submucosal dissection for duodenal neoplasms. Endoscopy 2012; 44: E414-E415
  • 9 Bartolí R, Boix J, Òdena G et al. Determination of the ideal preparation for colonoscopy in a rat model. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2012; 22: 542-545
  • 10 Bartolí R, Boix J, Moreno de Vega V et al. Endoscopic Shielding Technique with a newly developed hydrogel on colonic microperforation in an experimental model with rats. UEG Journal 2015; 3: A554
  • 11 Lorenzo-Zúñiga V, Bartolí R, Moreno de Vega V et al. Endoscopic shielding technique with a newly developed hydrogel on mucosal thermal injury in a porcine model. UEG Journal 2015; 3: A560
  • 12 Kazakos K, Lyras DN, Verettas D et al. The use of autologous PRP gel as an aid in the management of acute trauma wounds. Injury 2009; 40: 801-805
  • 13 Zhou B, Ren J, Ding C et al. Protection of colonic anastomosis with platelet-rich plasma gel in the open abdomen. Injury 2014; 45: 864-868
  • 14 Amable PR, Carias RB, Teixeira MV et al. Platelet-rich plasma preparation for regenerative medicine: optimization and quantification of cytokines and growth factors. Stem Cell Res The 2013; 4: 67