Open Access
Endosc Int Open 2016; 04(10): E1101-E1106
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-114980
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

An innovative ex-vivo porcine upper gastrointestinal model for submucosal tunnelling endoscopic resection (STER)

Authors

  • Baldwin Yeung

    1   Division of Upper GI & Metabolic Surgery, Department of Surgery, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  • Philip Chiu

    1   Division of Upper GI & Metabolic Surgery, Department of Surgery, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
    2   Institute of Digestive Disease, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  • Anthony Teoh

    1   Division of Upper GI & Metabolic Surgery, Department of Surgery, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  • Linfu Zheng

    2   Institute of Digestive Disease, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  • Shannon Chan

    1   Division of Upper GI & Metabolic Surgery, Department of Surgery, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  • Kelvin Lam

    2   Institute of Digestive Disease, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  • Raymond Tang

    2   Institute of Digestive Disease, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  • Enders K. W. Ng

    1   Division of Upper GI & Metabolic Surgery, Department of Surgery, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
    2   Institute of Digestive Disease, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

submitted12. Februar 2016

accepted after revision29. Juli 2016

Publikationsdatum:
14. September 2016 (online)

Preview

Background and study aims: Submucosal tunnelling endoscopic resection (STER) is a novel endoscopic technique to remove submucosal tumour (SMT). We propose a novel, low cost simulator for training of techniques for STER.

Patients and methods: The model consisted of an ex-planted porcine oesophagus, stomach and duodenum with marbles embedded surgically in the submucosal plane. Two expert endoscopists with experience in submucosal tunnelling and 5 board-certified endoscopists with no experience in submucosal tunnelling were recruited. Participants were asked to perform a diagnostic endoscopy and 2 STER procedures, 1 in the oesophagus and 1 in the stomach. They also answered a structured questionnaire. Factors including operative time, mucosal and muscular injury rate, injection volume and accuracy of endoscopic closure were assessed.

Results: The median time for localization of all SMTs was 40.1 seconds for experts and 38.5 seconds for novices (P = 1.000). For esophageal STER, the length of mucosal incisions and tunnelling distances were comparable between the 2 groups. The median volume injected by the novice group was significantly lower than the experts (15 mL vs 42.5 mL (P = 0.05). The median tunnelling time per length was 25.9 seconds/mm for the experts and 40.8 seconds/mm for the novice group (P = 0.38). There was a higher rate of mucosal injury and muscular perforation in the novice group (8 vs 0; P = 0.05). For gastric STER, the length of mucosal incisions and tunnel distances were comparable between the 2 groups. The median tunnelling time per length for the experts was 23.3 seconds/mm and 34.6 seconds/mm for the novice group (P = 0.38). One mucosal injury was incurred by a novice. The rate of dissection in the stomach and the oesophagus was not statistically different (P = 0.620). All participants voted that the model provides a realistic simulation and recommended it for training.

Conclusions: STER is an advanced endoscopic technique where its indication is currently explored. Experienced and novice STER endoscopists have expressed the usefulness of this model as a training tool. This low-cost model can be used for future research in STER.