Endoscopic sphincterotomy and risk of cholangiocarcinoma: a population-based cohort study in Finland and Sweden

Background and study aims: Elevated long-term risk of cholangiocarcinoma is reported after endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES), but in a previous study we found a trend towards a decreased risk. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association in a larger cohort with a longer follow-up.

Patients and methods: Data concerning all patients having had an inpatient endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) were collected from the hospital discharge registries of Finland and Sweden. Incident cases of malignancy were identified through linkage to the nationwide Cancer Registries. Patients with a diagnosis of malignancy, before or within 2 years of the ERCP, were excluded. The cohorts were followed until a diagnosis of malignancy, death or emigration, or end of follow-up (end of 2010). The relative risk of malignancy was calculated as standardized incidence ratio (SIR) compared with the general population, inherently adjusting for age, gender, and calendar year of follow-up.

Results: A total of 69 925 patients undergoing ERCP from 1976 through 2008 were included in the pooled cohort. ES was performed in 40 193 subjects. The risk of malignancy was elevated in the total cohort (SIR = 2.3; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.1 – 2.5) irrespective of whether ES was performed or not. The SIRs diminished with duration of follow-up.

Conclusions: We found an elevated risk of malignancy both in the bile ducts alone and in the bile ducts, liver or pancreas together, after ERCP. The risk was the same, regardless of whether ES had been performed or not, so ES was unlikely to be the cause, and a common carcinogenic exposure previous to the ERCP procedure, possibly ductal gallstone disease, was more likely.

• References

• 1 Classen M, Demling L. [Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the papilla of vater and extraction of stones from the choledochal duct (author’s transl)]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1974; 99: 496-497
• 2 Kawai K, Akasaka Y, Murakami K et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the ampulla of Vater. Gastrointest Endosc 1974; 20: 148-151
• 3 Davidson BR, Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct calculi in patients with gall bladder in situ considered unfit for surgery. Gut 1988; 29: 114-120
• 4 Gregg JA, De Girolami P, Carr-Locke DL. Effects of sphincteroplasty and endoscopic sphincterotomy on the bacteriologic characteristics of the common bile duct. Am J Surg 1985; 149: 668-671
• 5 Tanaka M, Takahata S, Konomi H et al. Long-term consequence of endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48: 465-469
• 6 Tranter SE, Thompson MH. Comparison of endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 1495-1504
• 7 Haratake J, Horie A, Takeda N. [Cancer of the intra-pancreatic common bile duct observed 9 years after choledochojejunostomy]. Gan no rinsho 1983; 29: 1367-1370
• 8 Shields HM. Occurrence of an adenocarcinoma at the choledochoenteric anastomosis 14 years after pancreatoduodenectomy for benign disease. Gastroenterology 1977; 72: 322-324
• 9 Tocchi A, Mazzoni G, Liotta G et al. Late development of bile duct cancer in patients who had biliary-enteric drainage for benign disease: a follow-up study of more than 1,000 patients. Ann Surg 2001; 234: 210-214
• 10 Stromberg C, Luo J, Enochsson L et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and risk of malignancy in the bile ducts, liver, and pancreas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6: 1049-1053
• 11 Fall K, Ye W, Nyren O. Risk for gastric cancer after cholecystectomy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 1180-1184
• 12 Sund R. Quality of the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register: a systematic review. Scand J Publ Health 2012; 40: 505-515
• 13 Nyren O, McLaughlin JK, Gridley G et al. Cancer risk after hip replacement with metal implants: a population-based cohort study in Sweden. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995; 87: 28-33
• 14 Lens MB, Newton-Bishop JA. An association between cutaneous melanoma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: pooled analysis of published data with a review. Ann Oncol 2005; 16: 460-465
• 15 Lipworth L, Tarone RE, Friis S et al. Cancer among Scandinavian women with cosmetic breast implants: a pooled long-term follow-up study. Int J Cancer 2009; 124: 490-493
• 16 Scheurer ME, Etzel CJ, Liu M et al. Familial aggregation of glioma: a pooled analysis. Am J Epidemiol 2010; 172: 1099-1107
• 17 Fujimoto T, Tsuyuguchi T, Sakai Y et al. Long-term outcome of endoscopic papillotomy for choledocholithiasis with cholecystolithiasis. Dig Endosc 2010; 22: 95-100
• 18 Pereira-Lima JC, Jakobs R, Winter UH et al. Long-term results (7 to 10 years) of endoscopic papillotomy for choledocholithiasis. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for the recurrence of biliary symptoms. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48: 457-464
• 19 Karlson BM, Ekbom A, Arvidsson D et al. Population-based study of cancer risk and relative survival following sphincterotomy for stones in the common bile duct. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 1235-1238
• 20 Mortensen FV, Jepsen P, Tarone RE et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and long-term risk of cholangiocarcinoma: a population-based follow-up study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008; 100: 745-750
• 21 Tazuma S, Kajiyama G. Carcinogenesis of malignant lesions of the gall bladder. The impact of chronic inflammation and gallstones. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2001; 386: 224-229