Lidocaine spray alone is similar to spray plus viscous solution for pharyngeal observation during transoral endoscopy: a clinical randomized trial

Abstract

Background and study aims It is important to examine the pharynx during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Pharyngeal anesthesia using topical lidocaine is generally used as pretreatment. In Japan, lidocaine viscous solution is the anesthetic of choice, but lidocaine spray is applied when the former is considered insufficient. However, the relationship between the extent of pharyngeal anesthesia and accuracy of observation is unclear. We compared the performance of lidocaine spray alone versus lidocaine spray combined with lidocaine viscous solution for pharyngeal observation during transoral endoscopy.

Patients and methods In this prospective, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial conducted between January and March 2015, 327 patients were randomly assigned to lidocaine spray alone (spray group, n = 157) or a combination of spray and viscous solution (combination group, n = 170). We compared the number of pharyngeal observable sites (non-inferiority test), pain by visual analogue scale, observation time, and the number of gag reflexes between the two groups.

Results The mean number of images of suitable quality taken at the observable pharyngeal sites in the spray group was 8.33 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 7.94 – 8.72) per patient, and 8.77 (95 % CI: 8.49 – 9.05) per patient in the combination group. The difference in the number of observable pharyngeal sites was – 0.44 (95 % CI: – 0.84 to – 0.03, P = 0.01). There were no differences in pain, observation time, or number of gag reflexes between the 2 groups. Subgroup analysis of the presence of sedation revealed no differences between the two groups for the number of pharyngeal observation sites and the number of gag reflexes. However, the number of gag reflexes was higher in the spray group compared to the combination group in a subgroup analysis that looked at the absence of sedation.

Conclusions Lidocaine spray for pharyngeal anesthesia was not inferior to lidocaine spray and viscous solution in terms of pharyngeal observation. It was considered that lidocaine viscous solution was unnecessary for pharyngeal observation. UMIN000016073

• References

• 1 Leslie K, Stonell CA. Anaesthesia and sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2005; 18: 431-436
• 2 Campo R, Brullet E, Montserrat A. et al. Identification of factors that influence tolerance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1999; 11: 201-204
• 3 Mogensen S, Treldal C, Feldager E. et al. New lidocaine lozenge as topical anesthesia compared to lidocaine viscous oral solution before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Local Reg Anesth 2012; 5: 17-22
• 4 Shaoul R, Higaze H, Lavy A. Evaluation of topical pharyngeal anaesthesia by benzocaine lozenge for upper endoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 24: 687-694
• 5 Evans LT, Saberi S, Kim HM. et al. Pharyngeal anesthesia during sedated EGDs: is “the spray” beneficial? A meta-analysis and systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 761-766
• 6 Kawaguchi M, Aoki S. Guidelines for digestive endoscopy. 3rd ed. Tokyo: Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society; 2006
• 7 Amornyotin S, Srikureja W, Chalayonnavin W. et al. Topical viscous lidocaine solution versus lidocaine spray for pharyngeal anesthesia in unsedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 581-586
• 8 Muto M, Nakane M, Katada C. et al. Squamous cell carcinoma in situ at oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal mucosal sites. Cancer 2004; 101: 1375-1381
• 9 Muto M, Katada C, Sano Y. et al. Narrow band imaging: A new diagnostic approach to visualize angiogenesis in superficial neoplasia. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol 2005; 3: 16-S20
• 10 Muto M, Minashi K, Yano T. et al. Early detection of superficial squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck region and esophagus by narrow band imaging: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 1566-1572
• 11 Asante MA, Northfield TC. Variation in taste of topical lignocaine anaesthesia for gastroscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1998; 12: 685-686
• 12 Collinsworth KA, Kalman SM, Harrison DC. The clinical pharmacology of lidocaine as an antiarrhythmic drug. Circulation 1974; 50: 1217-1230
• 13 Tsuji K, Doyama H, Takeda Y. et al. Use of transoral endoscopy for pharyngeal examination: cross-sectional analysis. Dig Endosc 2014; 26: 344-349
• 14 Kajimoto Y, Rosenberg ME, Kyttä J. et al. Anaphylactoid skin reactions after intravenous regional anaesthesia using 0.5% prilocaine with or without preservative -- a double-blind study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1995; 39: 782-784
• 15 Barnes L, Johnson JT. Pathologic and clinical considerations in the evaluation of major head and neck specimens resected for cancer. Part I. Pathol Annu 1986; 21: 173-250
• 16 McQuaid KR, Laine L. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials of moderate sedation for routine endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 910-923
• 17 Nakanishi H, Doyama H, Takemura K. et al. Detection of pharyngeal cancer in the overall population undergoing upper GI endoscopy by using narrow-band imaging: a single-center experience, 2009 – 2012. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 558-564
• 18 Kitagawa S. Digestive cancer screening nationwide summary report (Japan). J Gastroenterol Cancer Screen 2015; 53: 87-101
• 19 Heuss LT, Hanhart A, Dell-Kuster S. et al. Propofol sedation alone or in combination with pharyngeal lidocaine anesthesia for routine upper GI endoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 1207-1214
• 20 Draper MR, Blagnys B, Premachandra DJ. To 'EE' or not to 'EE'. J Otolaryngol 2007; 36: 191-195
• 21 Mori S, Yokoyama A, Matsui T. et al. Endoscopic screening for upper aerodigestive tract cancer in alcoholics using wide visualization of the pharynx and esophageal iodine staining procedures. Gastroenterol Endosc 2011; 53: 1426-1434