Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2023; 17(01): 234-241
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1749160
Original Article

The Effect of Salivary pH on the Flexural Strength and Surface Properties of CAD/CAM Denture Base Materials

Maryam Alzaid
1   College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
,
Fatemah AlToraibily 
1   College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
,
Faisal D. Al-Qarni 
2   Department of Substitutive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
,
Ahmad M. Al-Thobity 
2   Department of Substitutive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
,
Sultan Akhtar
3   Department of Biophysics, Institute for Research and Medical Consultations (IRMC), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
,
Saqib Ali 
4   Department of Biomedical Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
,
Fahad A. Al-Harbi
2   Department of Substitutive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
,
Mohammed M. Gad
2   Department of Substitutive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the influence of different salivary pH on flexural strength, hardness, and surface roughness of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) milled and three-dimensional (3D)-printed denture base resins.

Methods One heat-polymerized, two CAD/CAM milled (IvoCad, AvaDent), and two 3D-printed (FormLabs, NextDent) denture base resins were fabricated and divided into five groups (n = 10) according to the solutions: three groups were immersed in different salivary pH (5.7, 7.0, or 8.3), one group was immersed in distilled water (DW) as a positive control, and one group had no immersion (negative control). All immersions were performed at 37°C for 90 days. Flexural strength, hardness, and surface roughness were measured before and after immersion. Data was analyzed with analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey's test (α = 0.05).

Results After immersion, all specimens had lower flexural strength values when compared with those with no immersion. Comparing the immersion groups, the highest flexural strength value (93.96 ± 3.18 MPa) was recorded with IvoCad after immersion in DW while the lowest value (60.43 ± 2.66 MPa) was recorded with NextDent after being immersed in 7.0 pH saliva. All specimens had significant decrease in hardness except IvoCad and AvaDent specimens where both presented the highest surface hardness (53.76 ± 1.60 Vickers hardness number [VHN]) after immersion in DW while NextDent showed the lowest hardness value (24.91 ± 2.13 VHN) after being immersed in 8.3 pH saliva. There was statistically significant difference between the baseline and different artificial salivary pH solutions in terms of surfaces roughness, with the highest surface roughness were found in 3D-printed resin materials.

Conclusion After exposure to artificial saliva with different salivary pH, the milled CAD/CAM denture base resins showed higher flexural strength, hardness, and lesser surface roughness than conventional and 3D-printed denture base resins.

Keywords

CAD-CAM - 3D printing - polymethyl methacrylate denture base - saliva - mechanical test


Publication History

Article published online:
12 July 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Gad MM, Fouda SM, Al-Harbi FA. et al. PMMA denture base material enhancement: a review of fiber, filler, and nanofiller addition. Int J Nanomed 2017; (12) 3801-3812
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ozkir SE, Yilmaz B, Unal SM, Culhaoglu A, Kurkcuoglu I. Effect of heat polymerization conditions and microwave on the flexural strength of polymethyl methacrylate. Eur J Dent 2018; 12 (01) 116-119
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Alzayyat ST, Almutiri GA, Aljandan JK. et al. Effects of SiO2 incorporation on the flexural properties of a denture base resin: an in vitro study. Eur J Dent 2022; 16 (01) 188-194
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Chandu GS, Asnani P, Gupta S, Faisal Khan M. Comparative evaluation of effect of water absorption on the surface properties of heat cure acrylic: an in vitro study. J Int Oral Health 2015; 7 (04) 63-68
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Garcia LdaF, Roselino LdeM, Mundim FM, Pires-de-Souza FdeC, Consani S. Influence of artificial accelerated aging on dimensional stability of acrylic resins submitted to different storage protocols. J Prosthodont 2010; 19 (06) 432-437
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Sofya PA, Rahmayani L, Pumama RR. Effect of soft drink towards heat cured acrylic resin denture base surface roughness. Padjadjaran J Den 2017; 29: 58-63
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Lussi A, Jaeggi T, Zero D. The role of diet in the aetiology of dental erosion. Caries Res 2004; 38 (Suppl. 01) 34-44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Figuerôa RMS, Conterno B, Arrais CAG, Sugio CYC, Urban VM, Neppelenbroek KH. Porosity, water sorption and solubility of denture base acrylic resins polymerized conventionally or in microwave. J Appl Oral Sci 2018; 26: e20170383
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hussein YA, Al-Ameer SS. The influence of different pH of saliva and thermal cycling on the adaptation of different denture base materials. J Bagh Coll Dent 2012; 24: 47-53
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Constantinescu IR, Ursache M, Mardarez D. Effect of pH on the surface roughness of heat cured denture base acrylic resins [in Romanian]. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 2007; 111 (02) 477-481
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bilgin MS, Baytaroğlu EN, Erdem A, Dilber E. A review of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacture techniques for removable denture fabrication. Eur J Dent 2016; 10 (02) 286-291
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kalberer N, Mehl A, Schimmel M. et al. CAD-CAM milled versus rapidly prototyped (3D-printed) complete dentures: an in vitro evaluation of trueness. J Prosthet Dent 2019; 121: 637-643
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Al-Fouzan AF, Al-Mejrad LA, Albarrag AM. Adherence of Candida to complete denture surfaces in vitro: a comparison of conventional and CAD/CAM complete dentures. J Adv Prosthodont 2017; 9 (05) 402-408
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Infante L, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy E, Finger I. Fabricating complete dentures with CAD/CAM technology. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 111 (05) 351-355
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Gad MM, Fouda SM, Abualsaud R. et al. Strength and surface properties of a 3D-printed denture base polymer. J Prosthodont 2021; . Epub ahead of print DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13413.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Shim JS, Kim JE, Jeong SH, Choi YJ, Ryu JJ. Printing accuracy, mechanical properties, surface characteristics, and microbial adhesion of 3D-printed resins with various printing orientations. J Prosthet Dent 2020; 124 (04) 468-475
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 International Organization for Standardization. Dentistry-Base polymers Part I: Denture base polymers. ISO 20795–1. Geneva: 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Gad MM, Rahoma A, Abualsaud R. et al. Influence of artificial aging and ZrO2 nanoparticle-reinforced repair resin on the denture repair strength. J Clin Exp Dent 2020; 12 (04) e354-e362
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Fusayama T, Katayori T, Nomoto S. Corrosion of gold and amalgam placed in contact with each other. J Dent Res 1963; 42: 1183-1197
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Farooq I, Moheet IA, AlShwaimi E. In vitro dentin tubule occlusion and remineralization competence of various toothpastes. Arch Oral Biol 2015; 60 (09) 1246-1253
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Gad MM, Fouda SM, ArRejaie AS, Al-Thobity AM. Comparative effect of different polymerization techniques on the flexural and surface properties of acrylic denture bases. J Prosthodont 2019; 28 (04) 458-465
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Barsby MJ. A denture base resin with low water absorption. J Dent 1992; 20 (04) 240-244
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Arima T, Murata H, Hamada T. The effects of cross-linking agents on the water sorption and solubility characteristics of denture base resin. J Oral Rehabil 1996; 23 (07) 476-480
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Hamanaka I, Iwamoto M, Lassila L, Vallittu P, Shimizu H, Takahashi Y. Influence of water sorption on mechanical properties of injection-molded thermoplastic denture base resins. Acta Odontol Scand 2014; 72 (08) 859-865
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Jagini AS, Marri T, Jayyarapu D, Kumari R. , D V, K M. Effect of long-term immersion in water and artificial saliva on the flexural strength of two heat cure denture base resins. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019; 20 (03) 341-346
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Galav A, Deogade SC, Mantri S, Sumathi K, Galav S. Effect of water storage on the flexural strength of heat-cured denture base resin reinforced with stick (s) glass fibers. Contemp Clin Dent 2017; 8 (02) 264-271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Perea-Lowery L, Gibreel M, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. 3D-printed vs. heat-polymerizing and autopolymerizing denture base acrylic resins. Materials (Basel) 2021; 14 (19) 5781
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Gad MM, Alshehri SZ, Alhamid SA. et al. Water sorption, solubility, and translucency of 3D-printed denture base resins. Dent J (Basel) 2022; 10 (03) 42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Tuna SH, Keyf F, Gumus HO, Uzun C. The evaluation of water sorption/solubility on various acrylic resins. Eur J Dent 2008; 2 (03) 191-197
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Prpić V, Schauperl Z, Ćatić A, Dulčić N, Čimić S. Comparison of mechanical properties of 3D-printed, CAD/CAM, and conventional denture base materials. J Prosthodont 2020; 29 (06) 524-528
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 de Sá J, Vieira F, Aroso CM, Cardoso M, Mendes JM, Silva AS. The influence of saliva pH on the fracture resistance of three complete denture base acrylic resins. Int J Dent 2020; 2020: 8941876
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Perea-Lowery L, Minja IK, Lassila L, Ramakrishnaiah R, Vallittu PK. Assessment of CAD-CAM polymers for digitally fabricated complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2021; 125 (01) 175-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Anusavice KJ. Phillips' Science of Dental Materials. 11th ed.. Philadelphia: WB Saunder; 2003: 722-754
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Nicodemo C, Rezende C, Moretti-Neto R. et al. Micro-hardness of acrylic resin utilized for provisional crowns: effect of different polymerization techniques and pH cycling. Braz Dent Sci 2013; 16: 44-50
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Tuna EB, Rohlig BG, Sancakli E, Evlioglu G, Gencay K. Influence of acrylic resin polymerization methods on residual monomer release. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013; 14 (02) 259-264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Jafari P, Karimi VS, Amirian K. et al. Evaluation of beverages effect on the surface hardness and roughness of CAD/CAM and heat cure resin base. Inter J Advanc Sic Tech 2020; 29: 3993-4002
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Al-Otaibi H, Alshaalan NS, Alqarni R. et al. Monomer leakage behavior of conventional and CAD/CAM denture acrylic materials under different salivary pH values. Biosc Biotech Res Comm 2021; 14 (01) 15 DOI: 10.21786/bbrc/14.1/15.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Abuzar MA, Bellur S, Duong N. et al. Evaluating surface roughness of a polyamide denture base material in comparison with poly (methyl methacrylate). J Oral Sci 2010; 52 (04) 577-581
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Onwubu SC, Mdluli PS. Comparative analysis of abrasive materials and polishing system on the surface roughness of heat-polymerized acrylic resins. Eur J Dent 2022; 16 (03) 573-579 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1736293. Format:
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Alfadda SA, Al-Otaibi HN, Al-Shaalan NS. et al. The effects of salivary pH on color stability and surface roughness of different denture acrylic resin materials. Biotech Res Comm 2020; 13 (03) 46 DOI: 10.21786/bbrc/13.3/46.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Cilli R, Pereira JC, Prakki A. Properties of dental resins submitted to pH catalysed hydrolysis. J Dent 2012; 40 (12) 1144-1150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Al-Dwairi ZN, Tahboub KY, Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ, Özcan M. A comparison of the surface properties of CAD/CAM and conventional polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). J Prosthodont 2019; 28 (04) 452-457
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar