Diarylmethylamine (‘Butterfly’-Type Amine) Unit: A Useful Unit for the Modulation of the Catalytic Activity of Aminothiourea Catalysts

Abstract

We investigated the effects of substituents on the aromatic rings in a diarylmethylamine unit (which we have named the ‘butterfly’-type amine unit) in an aminothiourea catalyst. Detailed examination of the electronic effects of the aromatic rings revealed that the catalyst having a 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl group was the best, realizing an excellent chemical yield and enantioselectivity in an asymmetric Michael reaction between nitrostyrene and dimethyl malonate. Importantly, its catalytic ability as a chiral catalyst is superior to that of the well-known aminothiourea catalyst, the Takemoto catalyst, and this characteristic was observed in various asymmetric reactions.

Key words

thiourea catalysis - asymmetric catalysis - diarylmethylamines - organocatalysis - Michael reaction

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 05. April 2023

Angenommen nach Revision: 23. Mai 2023

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
27. Juni 2023

• References and Notes

• 1a Ahrend KA, Borths CJ, MacMillan DW. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000; 122: 4243
• 1b Northrup AB, MacMillan DW. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002; 124: 6798
• 2a List B, Lerner RA, Barbas CF. III. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000; 122: 2395
• 2b Notz W, List B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000; 122: 7386

For selected recent reviews on organocatalysis, see:
• 3a Atodiresel I, Vila C, Rueping M. ACS Catal. 2015; 5: 1972
• 3b Akiyama T, Mori K. Chem. Rev. 2015; 115: 9277
• 3c James T, van Gemmeren M, List B. Chem. Rev. 2015; 115: 9388
• 3d Borissov A, Davies TQ, Ellis ER, Fleming TA, Richardson MS. W, Dixon D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016; 45: 5474
• 3e Zou Y.-Q, Hormann FM, Bach T. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018; 47: 278
• 3f Ohmatsu K, Ooi T. Nat. Synth. 2023; 2: 209
• 3g Kondoh A, Terada M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2021; 94: 339
• 3h Hahn PL, Lowe JM, Xu Y, Burns KL, Hilinski MK. ACS Catal. 2022; 12: 4302
• 3i Lee H.-L, Maruoka K. Chem. Rec. 2023; e202200286
• 4 Ooi T, Kameda M, Maruoka K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999; 121: 6519
• 5 Akiyama T, Itoh J, Yokota K, Fuchibe K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004; 43: 1566
• 6 Uraguchi D, Terada M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004; 126: 5356
• 7a Marigo M, Wabnitz TC, Fielenbach D, Jørgensen KA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005; 44: 794
• 7b Hayashi Y, Gotoh H, Hayashi T, Shoji M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005; 44: 4212
• 8a Okino T, Hoashi Y, Takemoto Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 12672
• 8b Okino T, Hoashi Y, Furukawa T, Xu X, Takemoto Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005; 127: 119

For other early examples of aminothiourea catalysts, see:
• 9a Sigman MS, Jacobsen EN. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998; 120: 4901
• 9b Sohtome Y, Tanatani A, Hashimoto Y, Nagasawa K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004; 45: 5589

For some recent examples of aminothiourea catalysts, see:
• 10a Michigami K, Murakami H, Nakamura T, Hayama N, Takemoto Y. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019; 17: 2331
• 10b Franco F, Meninno S, Overgaard J, Rossi S, Benaglia M, Lattanzi A. Org. Lett. 2022; 24: 4371
• 10c Li D.-A, He X.-H, Tang X, Wu Y, Zhao H, He G, Peng C, Han B, Zhan G. Org. Lett. 2022; 24: 6197
• 10d You Z.-H, Liu Y.-K. Org. Lett. 2022; 24: 6288
• 10e Tokuhiro Y, Yoshikawa K, Murayama S, Nanjo T, Takemoto Y. ACS Catal. 2022; 12: 5292
• 10f Mallojjala SC, Sarker R, Karugu RW, Manna MS, Ray S, Mukherjee S, Hirschi JS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022; 144: 17399
• 10g Ray S, Mondal S, Mukherjee S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022; 61: e202201584

For selected reviews on aminothiourea catalysts, see:
• 11a Doyle AG, Jacobsen EN. Chem. Rev. 2007; 107: 5713
• 11b Zhang Z, Schreiner PR. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009; 38: 1187
• 11c Takemoto Y. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2010; 58: 593
• 11d Siau W.-Y, Wang J. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2011; 1: 1298
• 11e Serdyuk OV, Heckel CM, Tsogoeva SB. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013; 11: 7051
• 11f Fang X, Wang C.-J. Chem. Commun. 2015; 51: 1185
• 11g Wang Y, Lu H, Xu P.-F. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015; 48: 1832

In some cases, the high rigidity of the west side of the aminothiourea gave better results in terms of enantioselectivity, see:
• 12a Inokuma T, Furukawa M, Uno T, Suzuki Y, Yoshida K, Yano Y, Matsuzaki K, Takemoto Y. Chem. Eur. J. 2011; 17: 10470
• 12b Nanjo T, Zhang X, Tokuhiro Y, Takemoto Y. ACS Catal. 2019; 9: 10087
• 13a Kanemitsu T, Toyoshima E, Miyazali M, Nagata K, Itoh T. Heterocycles 2010; 81: 2781

See, also:
• 13b Otevrel J, Svestka D, Bobal P. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019; 17: 5244
• 14 Yang C, Wang J, Liu Y, Ni X, Li X, Cheng J.-P. Chem. Eur. J. 2017; 23: 5488
• 15 Berkes B, Ozsváth K, Molnár L, Gáti T, Holczbauer T, Kardos G, Soós T. Chem. Eur. J. 2016; 22: 18101
• 16 Suez G, Bloch V, Nisnevich G, Gandelman M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 2118
• 17a Jiang X, Zhang Y, Wu L, Zhang G, Liu X, Zhang H, Fu D, Wang R. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009; 351: 2096
• 17b Jiang X, Zhang Y, Liu X, Zhang G, Lai L, Wu L, Zhang J, Wang L. J. Org. Chem. 2009; 74: 5562
• 18a Schreiner PR, Wittkopp A. Org. Lett. 2002; 4: 217
• 18b Wittkopp A, Schreiner PR. Chem. Eur. J. 2003; 9: 407
• 19 Hamza A, Schubert G, Soós T, Pápai I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006; 128: 13151
• 20 Enders D, Gottfried K, Raabe G. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010; 352: 3147
• 21 Konishi H, Lam TY, Malerich JP, Rawal V H. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 2028
• 22 Wang J.-Y, Zhang H, Liao Y.-H, Yuan W.-C, Feng Y.-J, Zhang X.-M. Synlett 2012; 23: 796
• 23 N-{Bis[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]methyl}-N′-[(1R,2R)-2-(dimethylamino)cyclohexyl]thiourea (9a): Typical Procedure To a solution of the commercially available aldehyde 1a (767 mg, 3.17 mmol) in THF (12.3 mL) at 0 °C was added [3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]magnesium bromide (2a), prepared from Mg (110.7 mg, 4.61 mmol) and 1-bromo-3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)benzene (0.640 mL, 3.78 mmol). The mixture was stirred for 19 h at r.t., then the reaction was quenched by adding sat. aq NH₄Cl. The crude product was extracted with EtOAc (×3), and the combined organic extracts were washed with brine, dried (Na₂SO₄), and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by column chromatography [silica gel, hexane–EtOAc (4:1)] to give alcohol 3a as a white solid; yield: 1.44 g (quant); mp 92–94 °C. IR (KBr): 3338, 3105, 2918, 2849, 1626, 1466, 1363, 1319, 1278, 1131, 937 cm^–1. ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.86 (s, 6 H), 6.07 (br s, 1 H), 2.71 (br s, 1 H). ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 144.5, 151.3 (q, J _C–F = 33.3 Hz), 126.6, 123.0 (q, J _C–F = 270 Hz), 122.5 (m), 74.1. ¹⁹F NMR (283 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = –62.6. Anal. Calcd for C₁₇H₈F₁₂O: C, 44.76; H, 1.77. Found: C, 44.98; H, 1.96. Et₃N (0.900 mL, 6.46 mmol) and MsCl (0.300 mL, 3.88 mmol) were successively added to a solution of alcohol 3a (1.44 g, 3.15 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (31.7 mL) at 0 °C, and the mixture was stirred for 19 h at r.t. The crude products were concentrated in vacuo, and the residue was purified by column chromatography [silica gel, hexane–EtOAc (4:1)] to give mesylate 4a as a white solid; yield: 1.02 g (60%); mp 105–108 °C. IR (KBr): 3584, 3063, 2913, 2846, 1626, 1466, 1378, 1340, 1280, 1173, 1131, 958 cm^–1. ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.95 (s, 2 H), 7.82 (s, 4 H), 6.85 (s, 1 H), 3.04 (s, 3 H). ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 139.6, 132.9 (q, J _C–F = 33.9 Hz), 127.3 (m), 123.6 (m), 122.7 (q, J _C–F = 271.3 Hz), 79.5, 39.4. ¹⁹F NMR (283 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = –62.8. Anal. Calcd for C₁₈H₁₀F₁₂O₃S: C, 40.46; H, 1.89. Found: C, 40.72; H, 1.64. NaN₃ (68.2 mg, 1.05 mmol) was added to a solution of mesylate 4a (485 mg, 0.91 mmol) in DMF (0.962 mL) at r.t., and the mixture was stirred for 14 h at r.t. The reaction was quenched by adding H₂O, and the crude products were extracted with EtOAc (×3). The combined organic extracts were washed with brine, dried (Na₂SO₄), and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by column chromatography [silica gel, hexane–EtOAc (4:1)] to give azide 5a; yield: 403 mg. At this stage, some impurities, which were hard to separate, were present and, consequently, this material was used for the next reaction without further purification. To a solution of 5a in MeOH (8.5 mL) was added 10% Pd/C (43.8 mg) at r.t., and the mixture was stirred under H₂ (1 atm) at r.t. for 1 h. The mixture was then filtered through a Celite pad and concentrated in vacuo to give amine 6a (382 mg) as a yellow oil. This material was used in a subsequent reaction with isothiocyanate 8 without further purification.> Thiophosgene (0.198 mL, 2.60 mmol) was added to a solution of [(1R,2R)-2-aminocyclohexyl]dimethylamine (7; 339.8 mg, 2.39 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (13.4 mL) and sat. aq NaHCO₃ (13.4 mL) at 0 °C, and the mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 0.5 h. The crude products were extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (×3), and the combined organic extracts were washed with sat. aq NaHCO₃, dried (Na₂SO₄), and concentrated in vacuo to give isothiocyanate 8 (261.2 mg), which was used in the next reaction without further purification. To a solution of amine 6a in CH₂Cl₂ (6.01 mL) was added a solution of isothiocyanate 8 in CH₂Cl₂ (2.62 mL) at r.t., and the mixture was stirred for 40.5 h at r.t. The crude products were concentrated in vacuo, and the residue was purified by column chromatography [silica gel, CH₂Cl₂–MeOH (20:1)] to give thiourea 9a as a yellow amorphous solid; yield: 475 mg (82% from 4a); [α]_D ²⁵ +36.6 (c 1.00, CHCl₃). IR (neat): 3219, 3055, 2941, 2866, 1556, 1467, 1375, 1279, 1173, 1132 cm^–1. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.92 (s, 2 H), 7.83 (s, 1 H), 7.82 (s, 1 H), 7.73 (s, 2 H), 7.02 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 4.38 (br s, 1 H), 3.17 (br s, 1 H), 2.59 (br s, 6 H), 2.40–2.32 (m, 1 H), 2.07–1.94 (m, 2 H), 1.85–1.78 (m, 1 H), 1.46–1.12 (m, 4 H). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 182.9, 143.2, 142.7, 132.6 (q, J _C–F = 33.4 Hz), 132.2 (q, J _C–F = 33.4 Hz), 128.2, 127.9, 124.5 (q, J _C–F = 270.8 Hz), 124.3 (q, J _C–F = 270.8 Hz), 67.3, 60.7, 55.1, 39.1, 32.8, 29.7, 24.4, 24.1, 22.7. ¹⁹F NMR (283 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = –62.6 (s, 6 F), –62.8 (s, 6 F). Anal. Calcd for C₂₆H₂₅F₁₂N₃S: C, 48.83; H, 3.94; N, 6.57. Found: C, 48.68; H, 4.05; N, 6.36.