PDF herunterladen
Semin Neurol 2022; 42(03): 273-282
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1755561
Review Article

Language Assessment in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness

Charlène Aubinet 
1   Coma Science Group, GIGA Consciousness, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
2   Centre du Cerveau, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
3   Psychology and Neuroscience of Cognition Research Unit, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
,
Caroline Schnakers
4   Research Institute, Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare, Pomona, California
,
Steve Majerus
3   Psychology and Neuroscience of Cognition Research Unit, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
› Institutsangaben Funding This study was supported by the University and University Hospital of Liege, the Belgian National Funds for Scientific Research (FRS-FNRS), the European Union's Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation under the Specific Grant Agreement No. 945539 (Human Brain Project SGA3), the European Space Agency (ESA), and the Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (BELSPO) in the framework of the PRODEX Programme, the Center-TBI project (FP7-HEALTH-602150), the Public Utility Foundation “Université Européenne du Travail,” “Fondazione Europea di Ricerca Biomedica,” the BIAL Foundation, the Mind Science Foundation and the European Commission, the fund Generet, the King Baudouin Foundation, the Mind-Care foundation, DOCMA project [EU-H2020-MSCA–RISE–778234]. S.M. is research director at FRS-FNRS.
› Weitere Informationen
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

The assessment of residual language abilities in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) after severe brain injury is particularly challenging due to their limited behavioral repertoire. Moreover, associated language impairment such as receptive aphasia may lead to an underestimation of actual consciousness levels. In this review, we examine past research on the assessment of residual language processing in DoC patients, and we discuss currently available tools for identifying language-specific abilities and their prognostic value. We first highlight the need for validated and sensitive bedside behavioral assessment tools for residual language abilities in DoC patients. As regards neuroimaging and electrophysiological methods, the tasks involving higher level linguistic commands appear to be the most informative about level of consciousness and have the best prognostic value. Neuroimaging methods should be combined with the most appropriate behavioral tools in multimodal assessment protocols to assess receptive language abilities in DoC patients in the most complete and sensitive manner.

Keywords

language - disorders of consciousness - behavioral assessment - aphasia


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
13. September 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (1). N Engl J Med 1994; 330 (21) 1499-1508
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Laureys S, Celesia GG, Cohadon F. et al; European Task Force on Disorders of Consciousness. Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a new name for the vegetative state or apallic syndrome. BMC Med 2010; 8: 68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N. et al. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology 2002; 58 (03) 349-353
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Giacino JT. The Vegetative and Minimally Conscious States: Consensus-Based Criteria for Establishing Diagnosis and Prognosis. Vol 19. IOS Press; 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Wannez S, Gosseries O, Azzolini D. et al. Prevalence of coma-recovery scale-revised signs of consciousness in patients in minimally conscious state. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2018; 28 (08) 1350-1359
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bruno MA, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Thibaut A, Moonen G, Laureys S. From unresponsive wakefulness to minimally conscious PLUS and functional locked-in syndromes: recent advances in our understanding of disorders of consciousness. J Neurol 2011; 258 (07) 1373-1384
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Chatelle C, Hauger SL, Martial C. et al. Assessment of nociception and pain in participants in an unresponsive or minimally conscious state after acquired brain injury: the relation between the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised and the Nociception Coma Scale-Revised. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2018; 99 (09) 1755-1762
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Lopez-Rolon A, Vogler J, Howell K. et al. Severe disorders of consciousness after acquired brain injury: a single-centre long-term follow-up study. NeuroRehabilitation 2017; 40 (04) 509-517
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Demertzi A, Ledoux D, Bruno M-A. et al. Attitudes towards end-of-life issues in disorders of consciousness: a European survey. J Neurol 2011; 258 (06) 1058-1065
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85 (12) 2020-2029
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Aubinet C, Cassol H, Bodart O. et al. Simplified evaluation of CONsciousness disorders (SECONDs) in individuals with severe brain injury: a validation study. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2021; 64 (05) 101432
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Sanz LRD, Aubinet C, Cassol H. et al. SECONDs administration guidelines: a fast tool to assess consciousness in brain-injured patients. J Vis Exp 2021; 168 (168) 1-18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Seel RT, Sherer M, Whyte J. et al; American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, Brain Injury-Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group, Disorders of Consciousness Task Force. Assessment scales for disorders of consciousness: evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice and research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91 (12) 1795-1813
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Schnakers C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Giacino J. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC Neurol 2009; 9 (01) 35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Majerus S, Bruno MA, Schnakers C, Giacino JT, Laureys S. The problem of aphasia in the assessment of consciousness in brain-damaged patients. Prog Brain Res 2009; 177 (C): 49-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Schnakers C, Bessou H, Rubi-Fessen I. et al. Impact of aphasia on consciousness assessment: a cross-sectional study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2015; 29 (01) 41-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Rappaport M. The Disability Rating and Coma/Near-Coma scales in evaluating severe head injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2005; 15 (3-4): 442-453
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Thibaut A, Bodien YG, Laureys S, Giacino JT. Minimally conscious state “plus”: diagnostic criteria and relation to functional recovery. J Neurol 2020; 267 (05) 1245-1254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Whyte J, DiPasquale MC, Vaccaro M. Assessment of command-following in minimally conscious brain injured patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80 (06) 653-660
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Patterson K. Speak and spell: dissociations and word-class effects. In: Coltheart M, Sartori G, Job R. eds. The Cognitive Neuropsychology of Language (Psychology Revivals). Taylor and Francis; 1987: 433
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Yamaki T, Uchino Y, Henmi H. et al. Increased brain glucose metabolism in chronic severe traumatic brain injury as determined by longitudinal 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Clin Neurosci 2018; 57: 20-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Murphy L. The Cognitive Assessment by Visual Election (CAVE): a pilot study to develop a cognitive assessment tool for people emerging from disorders of consciousness. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2018; 28 (08) 1275-1284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Aubinet C, Murphy L, Bahri MA. et al. Brain, behavior, and cognitive interplay in disorders of consciousness: a multiple case study. Front Neurol 2018; 9 (08) 665
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Ardila A. A proposed reinterpretation and reclassification of aphasic syndromes. Aphasiology 2010; 24 (03) 363-394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Aubinet C, Chatelle C, Gillet S. et al. The Brief Evaluation of Receptive Aphasia test for the detection of language impairment in patients with severe brain injury. Brain Inj 2021; 35 (06) 705-717
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Borer-Alafi N, Gil M, Sazbon L, Korn C. Loewenstein communication scale for the minimally responsive patient. Brain Inj 2002; 16 (07) 593-609
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Rasmus A, Góral-Półrola J, Orłowska E, Wiłkość-Dębczyńska M, Grzywniak C. Nonverbal communication of trauma patients in a state of minimal consciousness. Ann Agric Environ Med 2019; 26 (02) 304-308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment and prognosis of coma after head injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1976; 34 (1-4): 45-55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Laureys S, Perrin F, Faymonville M-E. et al. Cerebral processing in the minimally conscious state. Neurology 2004; 63 (05) 916-918
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Owen AM, Coleman MR, Menon DK. et al. Residual auditory function in persistent vegetative state: a combined PET and fMRI study. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2005; 15 (3-4): 290-306
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Schiff ND, Rodriguez-Moreno D, Kamal A. et al. fMRI reveals large-scale network activation in minimally conscious patients. Neurology 2005; 64 (03) 514-523
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Balconi M, Arangio R. The relationship between coma near coma, disability ratings, and event-related potentials in patients with disorders of consciousness: a semantic association task. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 2015; 40 (04) 327-337
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Kempny AM, James L, Yelden K. et al. Patients with a severe prolonged disorder of consciousness can show classical EEG responses to their own name compared with others' names. Neuroimage Clin 2018; 19 (19) 311-319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Lechinger J, Wielek T, Blume C. et al. Event-related EEG power modulations and phase connectivity indicate the focus of attention in an auditory own name paradigm. J Neurol 2016; 263 (08) 1530-1543
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Risetti M, Formisano R, Toppi J. et al. On ERPs detection in disorders of consciousness rehabilitation. Front Hum Neurosci 2013; 7 (Nov): 775
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Rohaut B, Faugeras F, Chausson N. et al. Probing ERP correlates of verbal semantic processing in patients with impaired consciousness. Neuropsychologia 2015; 66: 279-292
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Schabus M, Pelikan C, Chwala-Schlegel N. et al. Oscillatory brain activity in vegetative and minimally conscious state during a sentence comprehension task. Funct Neurol 2011; 26 (01) 31-36
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Schnakers C, Giacino JT, Løvstad M. et al. Preserved covert cognition in noncommunicative patients with severe brain injury?. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2015; 29 (04) 308-317
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Steppacher I, Eickhoff S, Jordanov T, Kaps M, Witzke W, Kissler J. N400 predicts recovery from disorders of consciousness. Ann Neurol 2013; 73 (05) 594-602
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Wu DY, Cai G, Yuan Y. et al. Application of nonlinear dynamics analysis in assessing unconsciousness: a preliminary study. Clin Neurophysiol 2011; 122 (03) 490-498
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Chatelle C, Rosenthal ES, Bodien YG, Spencer-Salmon CA, Giacino JT, Edlow BL. EEG correlates of language function in traumatic disorders of consciousness. Neurocrit Care 2020; 33 (02) 449-457
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Aubinet C, Chatelle C, Gosseries O, Carrière M, Laureys S, Majerus S. Residual implicit and explicit language abilities in patients with disorders of consciousness: a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2022; 132: 391-409
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Hauger SL, Schanke AK, Andersson S, Chatelle C, Schnakers C, Løvstad M. The clinical diagnostic utility of electrophysiological techniques in assessment of patients with disorders of consciousness following acquired brain injury: a systematic review. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2017; 32 (03) 185-196
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Kurz EM, Wood G, Kober SE. et al. Towards using fNIRS recordings of mental arithmetic for the detection of residual cognitive activity in patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC). Brain Cogn 2018; 125: 78-87
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Abdalmalak A, Milej D, Norton L, Debicki DB, Owen AM, Lawrence KS. The potential role of fNIRS in evaluating levels of consciousness. Front Hum Neurosci 2021; 15: 703405
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Li M, Yang Y, Zhang Y. et al. Detecting residual awareness in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: an fNIRS study. Front Neurol 2021; 12: 618055
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Habbal D, Gosseries O, Noirhomme Q. et al. Volitional electromyographic responses in disorders of consciousness. Brain Inj 2014; 28 (09) 1171-1179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Vassilieva A, Olsen MH, Peinkhofer C, Knudsen GM, Kondziella D. Automated pupillometry to detect command following in neurological patients: a proof-of-concept study. PeerJ 2019; 7: e6929
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Coleman MR, Rodd JM, Davis MH. et al. Do vegetative patients retain aspects of language comprehension? Evidence from fMRI. Brain 2007; 130 (Pt 10): 2494-2507
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Coleman MR, Davis MH, Rodd JM. et al. Towards the routine use of brain imaging to aid the clinical diagnosis of disorders of consciousness. Brain 2009; 132 (Pt 9): 2541-2552
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Edlow BL, Chatelle C, Spencer CA. et al. Early detection of consciousness in patients with acute severe traumatic brain injury. Brain 2017; 140 (09) 2399-2414
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Erlbeck H, Real RGL, Kotchoubey B, Mattia D, Bargak J, Kübler A. Basic discriminative and semantic processing in patients in the vegetative and minimally conscious state. Int J Psychophysiol 2017; 113: 8-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Kotchoubey B, Lang S, Mezger G. et al. Information processing in severe disorders of consciousness: vegetative state and minimally conscious state. Clin Neurophysiol 2005; 116 (10) 2441-2453
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Sergent C, Faugeras F, Rohaut B. et al. Multidimensional cognitive evaluation of patients with disorders of consciousness using EEG: a proof of concept study. Neuroimage Clin 2016; 13: 455-469
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Beukema S, Gonzalez-Lara LE, Finoia P. et al. A hierarchy of event-related potential markers of auditory processing in disorders of consciousness. Neuroimage Clin 2016; 12: 359-371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Edlow BL, Claassen J, Schiff ND, Greer DM. Recovery from disorders of consciousness: mechanisms, prognosis and emerging therapies. Nat Rev Neurol 2021; 17 (03) 135-156
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Fernández-Espejo D, Junque C, Cruse D. et al. Combination of diffusion tensor and functional magnetic resonance imaging during recovery from the vegetative state. BMC Neurol 2010; 10: 77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Nigri A, Catricalà E, Ferraro S. et al; CRC - Coma Research Centre members. The neural correlates of lexical processing in disorders of consciousness. Brain Imaging Behav 2017; 11 (05) 1526-1537
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Kotchoubey B, Yu T, Mueller F, Vogel D, Veser S, Lang S. True or false? Activations of language-related areas in patients with disorders of consciousness. Curr Pharm Des 2014; 20 (26) 4239-4247
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Formisano R, Toppi J, Risetti M. et al. Language-related brain potentials in patients with disorders of consciousness: a follow-up study to detect “covert” language disorders. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2019; 33 (07) 513-522
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Schoenle PW, Witzke W. How vegetative is the vegetative state? Preserved semantic processing in VS patients–evidence from N 400 event-related potentials. NeuroRehabilitation 2004; 19 (04) 329-334
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Balconi M, Arangio R, Guarnerio C. Disorders of consciousness and N400 ERP measures in response to a semantic task. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2013; 25 (03) 237-243
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Bruno MA, Majerus S, Boly M. et al. Functional neuroanatomy underlying the clinical subcategorization of minimally conscious state patients. J Neurol 2012; 259 (06) 1087-1098
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Aubinet C, Cassol H, Gosseries O. et al. Brain metabolism but not grey matter volume underlies the presence of language function in the minimally conscious state. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2020; 34 (02) 172-184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Aubinet C, Panda R, Larroque SK. et al. Reappearance of command-following is associated with the recovery of language and internal-awareness networks: a longitudinal multiple-case report. Front Syst Neurosci 2019; 13 (02) 8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Aubinet C, Larroque SK, Heine L. et al. Clinical subcategorization of minimally conscious state according to resting functional connectivity. Hum Brain Mapp 2018; 39 (11) 4519-4532
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Ferraro S, Nigri A, D'Incerti L. et al. Preservation of language processing and auditory performance in patients with disorders of consciousness: a multimodal assessment. Front Neurol 2020; 11 (December): 526465
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Zheng ZS, Reggente N, Lutkenhoff E, Owen AM, Monti MM. Disentangling disorders of consciousness: insights from diffusion tensor imaging and machine learning. Hum Brain Mapp 2017; 38 (01) 431-443
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Guldenmund P, Soddu A, Baquero K. et al. Structural brain injury in patients with disorders of consciousness: a voxel-based morphometry study. Brain Inj 2016; 30 (03) 343-352
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Claassen J, Velazquez A, Meyers E. et al. Bedside quantitative electroencephalography improves assessment of consciousness in comatose subarachnoid hemorrhage patients. Ann Neurol 2016; 80 (04) 541-553
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Gui P, Jiang Y, Zang D. et al. Assessing the depth of language processing in patients with disorders of consciousness. Nat Neurosci 2020; 23 (06) 761-770
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Kotchoubey B, Kaiser J, Bostanov V, Lutzenberger W, Birbaumer N. Recognition of affective prosody in brain-damaged patients and healthy controls: a neurophysiological study using EEG and whole-head MEG. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2009; 9 (02) 153-167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Tomaiuolo F, Cecchetti L, Gibson RM. et al. Progression from vegetative to minimally conscious state is associated with changes in brain neural response to passive tasks: a longitudinal single-case functional MRI Study. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2016; 22 (06) 620-630
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Braiman C, Fridman EA, Conte MM. et al. Cortical response to the natural speech envelope correlates with neuroimaging evidence of cognition in severe brain injury. Curr Biol 2018; 28 (23) 3833-3839.e3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Forgacs PB, Conte MM, Fridman EA, Voss HU, Victor JD, Schiff ND. Preservation of electroencephalographic organization in patients with impaired consciousness and imaging-based evidence of command-following. Ann Neurol 2014; 76 (06) 869-879
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Rodriguez Moreno D, Schiff ND, Giacino J, Kalmar K, Hirsch J. A network approach to assessing cognition in disorders of consciousness. Neurology 2010; 75 (21) 1871-1878
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Coffey BJ, Threlkeld ZD, Foulkes AS, Bodien YG, Edlow BL. Reemergence of the language network during recovery from severe traumatic brain injury: a pilot functional MRI study. Brain Inj 2021; 35 (12-13): 1552-1562
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Bardin JC, Fins JJ, Katz DI. et al. Dissociations between behavioural and functional magnetic resonance imaging-based evaluations of cognitive function after brain injury. Brain 2011; 134 (Pt 3): 769-782
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Liang X, Kuhlmann L, Johnston LA. et al. Extending communication for patients with disorders of consciousness. J Neuroimaging 2014; 24 (01) 31-38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Goldfine AM, Victor JD, Conte MM, Bardin JC, Schiff ND. Determination of awareness in patients with severe brain injury using EEG power spectral analysis. Clin Neurophysiol 2011; 122 (11) 2157-2168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Curley WH, Forgacs PB, Voss HU, Conte MM, Schiff ND. Characterization of EEG signals revealing covert cognition in the injured brain. Brain 2018; 141 (05) 1404-1421
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Claassen J, Doyle K, Matory A. et al. Detection of brain activation in unresponsive patients with acute brain injury. N Engl J Med 2019; 380 (26) 2497-2505
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Hauger SL, Schnakers C, Andersson S. et al. Neurophysiological indicators of residual cognitive capacity in the minimally conscious state. Behav Neurol 2015; 2015: 145913
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Lulé D, Noirhomme Q, Kleih SC. et al. Probing command following in patients with disorders of consciousness using a brain-computer interface. Clin Neurophysiol 2013; 124 (01) 101-106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Naci L, Owen AM. Making every word count for nonresponsive patients. JAMA Neurol 2013; 70 (10) 1235-1241
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Naci L, Haugg A, MacDonald A. et al. Functional diversity of brain networks supports consciousness and verbal intelligence. Sci Rep 2018; 8 (01) 13259
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 87 Haugg A, Cusack R, Gonzalez-Lara LE, Sorger B, Owen AM, Naci L. Do patients thought to lack consciousness retain the capacity for internal as well as external awareness?. Front Neurol 2018; 9 (June): 492
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 88 Monti MM, Pickard JD, Owen AM. Visual cognition in disorders of consciousness: from V1 to top-down attention. Hum Brain Mapp 2013; 34 (06) 1245-1253
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 89 Pan J, Xie Q, He Y. et al. Detecting awareness in patients with disorders of consciousness using a hybrid brain-computer interface. J Neural Eng 2014; 11 (05) 056007
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 90 Schiff ND. Cognitive motor dissociation following severe brain injuries. JAMA Neurol 2015; 72 (12) 1413-1415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 91 Owen AM, Coleman MR, Boly M, Davis MH, Laureys S, Pickard JD. Detecting awareness in the vegetative state. Science 2006; 313 (5792): 1402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 92 Thibaut A, Panda R, Annen J. et al. Preservation of brain activity in unresponsive patients identifies MCS Star. Ann Neurol 2021; 90 (01) 89-100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 93 Monti MM, Coleman MR, Owen AM. Executive functions in the absence of behavior: functional imaging of the minimally conscious state. Prog Brain Res 2009; 177 (C): 249-260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 94 Sokoliuk R, Degano G, Banellis L. et al. Covert speech comprehension predicts recovery from acute unresponsive states. Ann Neurol 2021; 89 (04) 646-656
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 95 Zhang Y, Li R, Du J, Huo S, Hao J, Song W. Coherence in P300 as a predictor for the recovery from disorders of consciousness. Neurosci Lett 2017; 653: 332-336
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 96 Steppacher I, Fuchs P, Kaps M, Nussbeck FW, Kissler J. A tree of life? Multivariate logistic outcome-prediction in disorders of consciousness. Brain Inj 2020; 34 (03) 399-406
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 97 Salvato G, Berlingeri M, De Maio G. et al. Autonomic responses to emotional linguistic stimuli and amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations predict outcome after severe brain injury. Neuroimage Clin 2020; 28: 102356
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar