PDF herunterladen
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2023; 36(02): 104-110
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1756520
Clinical Communication

A Retrospective Short-Term Evaluation Using a Polyaxial Plating System in 60 Small Animal Fractures

Haley Mascellino
1   MedVet Medical Center for Pets, Worthington, Ohio, United States
,
Karl Maritato
2   MedVet Medical and Cancer Center for Pets, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
,
Matthew Barnhart
1   MedVet Medical Center for Pets, Worthington, Ohio, United States
,
Philip Kass
3   UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, California, United States
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the use, complications and outcomes of the Liberty Lock System (LLS) used to repair fractures in dogs and cats.

Study Design Medical records (October 2016–June 2019) of dog and cat fractures repaired with the LLS were reviewed. Data reviewed included signalment, fracture classification, complications and radiographic outcome.

Results The LLS was used to repair 60 fractures (57 appendicular and 3 axial) in 54 dogs and 6 cats. Mean time to radiographic union was 6 weeks (range: 4–16). Radiographic union was achieved in all 60 fractures with 55/60 healing without recorded complications. Major complications 4/60 and minor complication 1/60 rates were low and no catastrophic complications occurred. The most common major complication was surgical site infection.

Conclusion The LLS allowed for successful repair in all 60 cases with a wide variety of fractures. The LLS had a similar complication rate and time to radiographic union to that reported in other veterinary locking plate systems. The LLS is a reliable locking plate system which offers some advantages such as a low-profile plate with the ability to place non-polyaxial to angled polyaxial screws, to treat fractures in dogs and cats.

Keywords

locking plate systems - fracture - implant design - radiograph

Authors' Contributions

H.M; K.M; M.R; PK; done the data analysis, drafting of manuscript, approvals and have taken the publicly accountability of content in the manuscript. H.M acquired the data, P.K; K.M; H.M designed the study, H.M; K.M; M.B; conceptualized the study. K.M. is a paid lecturer and does receive royalties for the sales of certain Everost products, however, not the implants evaluated in this study. M.B. receives royalties from the sales of some Everost products, however, not the implants evaluated in this study.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 18. April 2022

Angenommen: 31. Juli 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
28. Dezember 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Perren SM. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84 (08) 1093-1110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Gardner MJ, Helfet DL, Lorich DG. Has locked plating completely replaced conventional plating?. Am J Orthop 2004; 33 (09) 439-446
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Wagner M. General principles for the clinical use of the LCP. Injury 2003; 34 (Suppl. 02) B31-B42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Petazzoni M, Urizzi A, Verdonck B, Jaeger G. Fixin internal fixator: concept and technique. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23 (04) 250-253
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ness MG. Repair of Y-T humeral fractures in the dog using paired ‘String of Pearls’ locking plates. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22 (06) 492-497
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Jain R, Podworny N, Hupel TM, Weinberg J, Schemitsch EH. Influence of plate design on cortical bone perfusion and fracture healing in canine segmental tibial fractures. J Orthop Trauma 1999; 13 (03) 178-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Tepic S, Remiger AR, Morikawa K, Predieri M, Perren SM. Strength recovery in fractured sheep tibia treated with a plate or an internal fixator: an experimental study with a two-year follow-up. J Orthop Trauma 1997; 11 (01) 14-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Egol KA, Kubiak EN, Fulkerson E, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ. Biomechanics of locked plates and screws. J Orthop Trauma 2004; 18 (08) 488-493
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Szabó B, Dobránszky J, Major L. et al. Development and micro manufacturing of coronary stents in Hungary. Accessed July 28, 2022 at: http://real.mtak.hu/5744/1/1155664.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Goldhahn J, Scheele WH, Mitlak BH. et al. Clinical evaluation of medicinal products for acceleration of fracture healing in patients with osteoporosis. Bone 2008; 43 (02) 343-347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Goldhahn J, Mitlak B, Aspenberg P, Kanis JA, Rizzoli R, Reginster JY. GREES (Group for Respect of Ethics and Excellence in Science) Working Group on Bone Fracture-Healing. Critical issues in translational and clinical research for the study of new technologies to enhance bone repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90 (1, Suppl 1): 43-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Cook JL, Evans R, Conzemius MG. et al. Proposed definitions and criteria for reporting time frame, outcome, and complications for clinical orthopedic studies in veterinary medicine. Vet Surg 2010; 39 (08) 905-908
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Haidukewych GJ. Innovations in locking plate technology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2004; 12 (04) 205-212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Dudley M, Johnson AL, Olmstead M, Smith CW, Schaeffer DJ, Abbuehl U. Open reduction and bone plate stabilization, compared with closed reduction and external fixation, for treatment of comminuted tibial fractures: 47 cases (1980-1995) in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1997; 211 (08) 1008-1012
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Barnhart MD, Rides CF, Kennedy SC. et al. Fracture repair using a polyaxial locking plate system (PAX). Vet Surg 2013; 42 (01) 60-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Haaland PJ, Sjöström L, Devor M, Haug A. Appendicular fracture repair in dogs using the locking compression plate system: 47 cases. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22 (04) 309-315
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Voss K, Kull M, Hässig M, Montavon P. Repair of long-bone fractures in cats and small dogs with the Unilock mandible locking plate system. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22 (05) 398-405
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Guerrero TG, Kalchofner K, Scherrer N, Kircher P. The Advanced Locking Plate System (ALPS): a retrospective evaluation in 71 small animal patients. Vet Surg 2014; 43 (02) 127-135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Ferrero FC, Baroncelli AB, Hudson CC, Peirone B, Reif U, Piras LA. Fracture repair in cats using a conical coupling Mini 1.9 to 2.5 mm Locking Plate System. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2020; 33 (06) 443-450
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Haubruck P, Schmidmaier G. Infektanfälligkeit und Verhalten von Stahl : Vergleich mit Titanimplantaten in der Traumatologie [Susceptibility to infections and behavior of stainless steel : Comparison with titanium implants in traumatology]. Unfallchirurg 2017; 120 (02) 110-115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Tanner MC, Fischer C, Schmidmaier G, Haubruck P. Evidence-based uncertainty: do implant-related properties of titanium reduce the susceptibility to perioperative infections in clinical fracture management? A systematic review. Infection 2021; 49 (05) 813-821
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar