CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2017; 05(04): E282-E290
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-102433
Original article
Eigentümer und Copyright ©Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017

Efficacy and safety of PICOPREP tailored dosing compared with PICOPREP day-before dosing for colon cleansing: a multi-centric randomised study

Ralf Kiesslich
1   Klinikdirektor ZIM II, Sprecher ZIM (Zentrum für Innere Medizin), Helios Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden, Germany
,
Stefan Schubert
2   Gastroenterologie am Bayerischen Platz, Berlin, Germany
,
Michael Mross
3   Praxis Dr. med. Michael R Mross, Berlin, Germany
,
Tobias Klugmann
4   Internistische Gemeinschaftspraxis, Leipzig, Germany
,
Michael Klemt-Kropp
5   Medisch Centrum, Alkmaar, the Netherlands
,
Imke Behnken
6   Internistisches Facharztzentrum Dr M Scholz, Langen, Germany
,
Gillaume Bonnaud
7   Clinique des Cèdres, Blagnac, France
,
Eric Keulen
8   Orbis Medisch Centrum, Sittard, the Netherlands
,
Marcel Groenen
9   Rijnstate Arnhem, Wagnerlaan, the Netherlands
,
Michael Blaker
10   Gastroenterologie Eppendorfer Baum, Hamburg, Germany
,
Thierry Ponchon
11   Ed Herriot Hopìtal, Lyon, France
,
Wilfred Landry
12   MVZ Dachau, Dachau, Germany
,
Meredin Stoltenberg
13   Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Kay Fiskers Plads 11 Copenhagen S, Denmark
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 04 April 2016

accepted after revision 19 January 2017

Publication Date:
03 April 2017 (online)

Abstract

Background and study aims The success of any colonoscopy procedure depends upon the quality of bowel preparation. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a new tailored dosing (TD) regimen compared with the approved PICOPREP day-before dosing regimen (DBD) in the European Union.

Patient and methods Patients (≥ 18 years) undergoing colonoscopy were randomised (2:1) to TD (Dose 1, 10 – 18 hours; Dose 2, 4 – 6 hours before colonoscopy) or DBD (Dose 1 before 8:00AM on the day before colonoscopy; Dose 2, 6 – 8 hours after Dose 1). The primary endpoint of overall colon cleansing efficacy was based on total Ottawa Scale (OS) scores (0 – 14, excellent-worst). The key secondary endpoint was a binary endpoint based on the ascending colon OS (success 0 or 1, failure [≥ 2]). Convenience and satisfaction were evaluated similar to the primary and key secondary endpoints. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated.

Results Use of the PICOPREP TD regimen resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the mean total Ottawa Scale score compared to the PICOPREP DBD regimen (–3.93, 95 % confidence intervals [CI]: – 4.99, – 2.97; P < 0.0001) in the intent-to-treat analysis set. The PICOPREP TD regimen also resulted in a statistically significant increase in the odds of achieving an ascending colon OS score ≤ 1, compared to the PICOPREP DBD regimen (estimated odds ratio 9.18, 95 % CI: 4.36, 19.32; P < 0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in the overall rate of treatment-emergent adverse events (12 % (TD) and 5.7 % (DBD), respectively, P = 0.2988). The convenience and satisfaction were comparable in the two groups.

Conclusion The TD regimen was superior to the DBD regimen for overall and ascending colon cleansing efficacy.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02239692

 
  • References

  • 1 Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM. et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 612: 69-90
  • 2 Prakash SR, Verma S, McGowan J. et al. Improving the quality of colonoscopy bowel preparation using an educational video. Can J Gastroenterol 2013; 27: 696-700
  • 3 Hagege H, Laugier R, Nahon S. et al. Real-life conditions of use of sodium phosphate tablets for colon cleansing before colonoscopy. Endosc Int Open 2015; 3: 346-353
  • 4 Shah H, Desai D, Samant H. et al. Comparison of split-dosing vs non-split (morning) dosing regimen for assessment of quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 6: 606-611
  • 5 Yoo IK, Lee JS, Chun HJ. et al. A randomized, prospective trial on efficacy and tolerability of low-volume bowel preparation methods for colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis 2015; 47: 131-137
  • 6 Jeon SR, Kim HG, Lee JS. et al. Randomized controlled trial of low-volume bowel preparation agents for colonic bowel preparation: 2-L polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid versus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate. Int J Colorectal Dis 2015; 30: 251-258
  • 7 Hassan C, Bretthauer MF, Kaminski MF. et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guidelines. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 142-150
  • 8 Mathus-Vliegen E, Pellise M, Heresbach D. et al. Consensus guidelines for the use of bowel preparation prior to colonic diagnostic procedures: colonoscopy and small bowel video capsule endoscopy. Curr Med Res Opin 2013; 29: 931-945
  • 9 Johnson D, Barkun A, Cohen L. et al. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2014; 147: 903-924
  • 10 Rex D. Optimal bowel preparation – a practical guide for clinicians. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 11: 419-425
  • 11 Rex D. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: entering an era of increased expectations for efficacy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 12: 458-462
  • 12 Oh CH, Lee CK, Kim JW. et al. Suboptimal bowel preparation significantly impairs colonoscopic detection of non-polypoid colorectal neoplasms. Dig Dis Sci 2015; 60: 2294-2303
  • 13 Rex DK, Katz PO, Bertiger G. et al. Split-dose administration of a dual-action, low-volume bowel cleanser for colonoscopy: the SEE CLEAR I study. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 132-141
  • 14 Manes G, Repici A, Hassan C. ;MAGIC-P study group Randomized controlled trial comparing efficacy and acceptability of split- and standard-dose sodium picosulfate plus magnesium citrate for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 662-669
  • 15 Kim ES, Lee WJ, Jeen YT. et al. A randomized, endoscopist-blinded, prospective trial to compare the preference and efficacy of four bowel-cleansing regimens for colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 2014; 49: 871-877
  • 16 Song KH, Suh WS, Jeong JS. et al. Effectiveness of sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate (PICO) for colonoscopy preparation. Ann Coloproctol 2014; 30: 222-227
  • 17 Katz PO, Rex DK, Epstein M. et al. A dual-action, low-volume bowel cleanser administered the day before colonoscopy: results from the SEE CLEAR II study. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 401-409
  • 18 Muñoz-Navas M, Calleja JL, Payeras G. et al. A randomized trial to compare the efficacy and tolerability of sodium picosulfate-magnesium citrate solution vs. 4 L polyethylene glycol solution as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy. J Colorectal Dis 2015; 30: 1407-1416
  • 19 Bertiger G, Jones E, Dahdal DN. et al. Serum magnesium concentrations in patients receiving sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate bowel preparation: an assessment of renal function and electrocardiographic conduction. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2015; 28: 215-224
  • 20 Leitao K, Grimstad T, Bretthauer M. et al. Polyethylene glycol vs sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate for colonoscopy preparation. Endosc Int Open 2014; 2: E230-E234
  • 21 Kim HG, Huh KC, Koo HS. et al. Sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate (SPMC) plus laxative is a good alternative to conventional large volume polyethylene glycol in bowel preparation: a multicenter randomized single-blinded trial. Gut Liver 2015; 9: 494-501
  • 22 Turner D, Benchimol EI, Dunn H. et al. Pico-Salax versus polyethylene glycol for bowel cleanout before colonoscopy in children: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 1038-1045
  • 23 Di Nardo G, Aloi M, Cucchiara S. et al. Bowel preparations for colonoscopy: an RCT. Pediatrics 2014; 134: 249-256
  • 24 Vejzovic V, Wennick A, Idvall E. et al. Polyethylene glycol or sodium picosulphate based laxatives before colonoscopy in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2016; 62: 414-419
  • 25 Hahn S. Understanding noninferiority trials. Korean J Pediatr 2012; 55: 403-407
  • 26 Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Latinovich DR. et al. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 1696-1700