CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2017; 05(06): E450-E454
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-107614
Original article
Eigentümer und Copyright ©Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017

Efficacy and safety of a combination of hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate, and poloxamer 407 as a submucosal injection solution for endoscopic resection: pilot study on a swine model

G. Fernández-Esparrach
1   Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, ICMDiM, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
,
M. Cuatrecasas
2   Pathology Department, CDB, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, Banc de Tumors Biobanc Clinic-IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
,
C. Rodríguez de Miguel
1   Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, ICMDiM, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
,
C. Sánchez-Montes
1   Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, ICMDiM, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
,
H. Córdova
1   Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, ICMDiM, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

submitted 04. August 2016

accepted after revision 13. Januar 2017

Publikationsdatum:
31. Mai 2017 (online)

Abstract

Background and aims Endoscopic resection techniques require use of submucosal injection. The aim of this study was to assess a new solution that combines hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate, and poloxamer 407 for submucosal injection.

Methods A total of 48 gastric submucosal cushions were created in fresh porcine stomachs using gelafundin (n = 16) or the new solution diluted at 50 % (n = 16), or 80 % (n = 16). The duration of mucosal elevation was measured. In an in vivo model, 10 gastric submucosal cushions were created by injecting 2 mL of the new solution at 80 % and the animal was euthanized 30 minutes after the last injection.

Results Submucosal cushions with the new solution at 80 % and 50 % concentration lasted longer than with gelafundin (23.13 ± 15.57, 13.1 ± 6.6, 3.94 ± 1.53 minutes, respectively; P = 0.000). In the in vivo study, no damage or necrosis was observed in the mucosa or muscularis propria.

Conclusion The combination of hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate, and poloxamer 407 produces a long-lasting submucosal cushion and does not seem to induce acute damage in the tissue making it suitable for submucosal injection.

 
  • References

  • 1 ASGE TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE. Kantsevoy SV, Adler DG, Conway JD. et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 11-18
  • 2 Ferreira AO, Moleiro J, Torres J. et al. Solutions for submucosal injection in endoscopic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4: E1-E16
  • 3 Yamamoto H, Kawata H, Sunada K. et al. Successful en-bloc resection of large superficial tumors in the stomach and colon using sodium hyaluronate and small-caliber-tip transparent hood. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 690-694
  • 4 Katsinelos P, Kountouras J, Paroutoglou G. et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection of large sessile colorectal polyps with submucosal injection of hypertonic 50 percent dextrose-epinephrine solution. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49: 1384-1392
  • 5 Lee S-H, Park J-H, Hyun Park D. et al. Clinical efficacy of EMR with submucosal injection of a fibrinogen mixture: a prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 691-696
  • 6 Varadarajulu S, Tamhane A, Slaughter RL. Evaluation of dextrose 50% as a medium for injection-assisted polypectomy. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 907-912
  • 7 Uraoka T, Fujii T, Saito Y. et al. Effectiveness of glycerol as a submucosal injection for EMR. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 736-740
  • 8 Fernández-Esparrach G, Shaikh SN, Cohen A. et al. Efficacy of a reverse-phase polymer as a submucosal injection solution for EMR: a comparative study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 1135-1139
  • 9 Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kashimura K. et al. Tissue damage of different submucosal injection solutions for EMR. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 933-942
  • 10 Conio M, Rajan E, Sorbi D. et al. Comparative performance in the porcine esophagus of different solutions used for submucosal injection. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 513-516
  • 11 Fushiro M, Yahagi N, Kashimura K. et al. Comparison of various submucosal injection solutions for maintaining mucosal elevation during endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 579-583
  • 12 Yamamoto H, Sekine Y, Higashizawa T. et al. Successful en bloc resection of a large superficial gastric cancer by using sodium hyaluronate and electrocautery incision forceps. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 54: 629-632
  • 13 Di Simone MP, Vasina V, Scorrano F. et al. Barrier effect of Esoxx on esophageal mucosal damage: experimental study on ex-vivo swine model. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2012; 5: 103-107
  • 14 Bures J, Kopácová M, Kvetina J. et al. Different solutions used for submucosal injection influenced early healing of gastric endoscopic mucosal resection in a preclinical study in experimental pigs. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 2094-2101
  • 15 Uraoka T, Ochiai Y, Fujimoto A. et al. A novel fully synthetic and self-assembled peptide solution for endoscopic submucosal dissection induced ulcer in the stomach. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 1259-1264
  • 16 Kusano T, Etoh T, Akagi T. et al. Evaluation of 0.6% sodium alginate as a submucosal injection material in endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. Dig Endosc 2014; 26: 638-645