ERCP competence assessment: Miles to go before standardization

References
1 Faigel DO, Pike IM, Baron TH. et al. Quality indicators for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: an introduction. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: S3-S9
2 Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed?. JAMA 1988; 260: 1743-1748
3 Campbell SM, Roland MO, Buetow SA. Defining quality of care. Soc Sci Med 2000; 51: 1611-1625
4 Ekkelenkamp VE, Koch AD, Rauws EA. et al. Competence development in ERCP: the learning curve of novice trainees. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 949-955
5 Lim BS, Leung JW, Lee J. et al. Effect of ERCP mechanical simulator (EMS) practice on trainees' ERCP performance in the early learning period: US multicenter randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106: 300-306
6 Wani S, Hall M, Keswani RN. et al. Variation in aptitude of trainees in endoscopic ultrasonography, based on cumulative sum analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13: 1318-1325
7 Iobst WF, Caverzagie KJ. Milestones and competency-based medical education. Gastroenterology 2013; 145: 921-924
8 Nasca TJ, Philibert I, Brigham T. et al. The next GME accreditation system–rationale and benefits. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1051-1056
9 Baron TH, Petersen BT, Mergener K. et al. Quality indicators for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 892-897
10 Adler DG, Lieb 2nd JG, Cohen J. et al. Quality indicators for ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 54-66
11 Adler DG, Bakis G, Coyle WJ. ASGE Training Committee. et al. Principles of training in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 231-235
12 Rochester JS, Jaffe DL. Minimizing complications in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2007; 17: 105-127
13 Ekkelenkamp VE, Dowler K, Valori RM. et al. Patient comfort and quality in colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 2355-2361
14 Srivastava S, Sharma BC, Puri AS. et al. Impact of completion of primary biliary procedure on outcome of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic related perforation. Endoscop Int Open 2017; 05: 706-709
15 Navaneethan U, Lourdusamy D, Gutierrez NG. et al. New approach to decrease post-ERCP adverse events in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Endoscop Int Open 2017; 05: 710-717
16 Ekkelenkamp VE, Koch AD, Haringsma J. et al. Quality evaluation through self-assessment: a novel method to gain insight into ERCP performance. Frontline Gastroenterol 2014; 5: 10-16
17 Shahidi N, Ou G, Telford J. et al. Establishing the learning curve for achieving competency in performing colonoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80: 410-416
18 Gastroenterology. BSo. ERCP - The way forward, a standards framework (June 2014). Available at: http://www.bsg.org.uk/clinical-guidance/endoscopy/ercp-%E2%80%93-the-way-forward-a-standards-framework.html Accessed October 14, 2016.
19 Wani S, Hall M, Wang AY. et al. Variation in learning curves and competence for ERCP among advanced endoscopy trainees by using cumulative sum analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 711-9.e11
20 Sedlack RE. Validation process for new endoscopy teaching tools. Tech Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 13: 151-154
21 Sedlack RE, Coyle WJ, Obstein KL. ASGE Training Committee. et al. ASGE's assessment of competency in endoscopy evaluation tools for colonoscopy and EGD. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 1-7
22 Chassin MR, Galvin RW. The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. JAMA 1998; 280: 1000-1005