Development of a porcine model for assessment of mucosal repair following endoscopic resection of the lower gastrointestinal tract

Abstract

Background and aims Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is widely performed for the treatment of colorectal polyps. However, the pathophysiological mechanisms of mucosal repair, including in situations at high risk of post-polypectomy bleeding, remain largely unknown. The objective of our study was to develop a porcine model of EMR in the lower gastrointestinal tract to monitor mucosal wound healing over time.

Methods Under general anesthesia, five large wounds were created in the lower gastrointestinal tract at different times, i. e. at day 0, 3, 7, 10, and 14, by multiband EMR, in each of the six pigs in the study. A colorectal resection was performed at day 14 and the animal euthanized. Repeated endoscopic and endomicroscopic examination, and histological analysis were performed.

Results No complications occurred and all animals reached the study end point. The endoscopic aspect of wound healing evolved into different phases with first a fibrin deposit covering the wounds which then gave way to granulomatous tissue. The size of the wound regressed significantly as early as day 3. Re-epithelialization of the wound started from day 7, and neo-mucosal crypts appeared from day 10. The endomicroscopic analysis described a ‘ground glass appearance’ from day 3 and irregular crypts from day 10, which was consistent with histological data. Good agreement between macroscopic, endomicroscopic, and histological parameters of mucosal wound healing was observed in vivo.

Conclusion This study demonstrates for the first time the feasibility of an experimental in vivo porcine model of lower gastrointestinal endoscopic resections to monitor tissue repair. This model might be helpful to document pharmacological approaches for preventing complications of endoscopic procedures performed in humans.

• References

• 1 Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ. et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. NEJM 2012; 23: 687-696
• 2 Fyock CJ, Draganov PV. Colonoscopic polypectomy and associated techniques. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 3630-3637
• 3 Zhang Q, An S, Chen Z. et al. Assessment of risk factors for delayed colonic post-polypectomy hemorrhage: a study of 15553 polypectomies from 2005 to 2013. PloS One 2014; 9: e108290
• 4 Zhang Q-S, Han B, Xu J-H. et al. Clip closure of defect after endoscopic resection in patients with larger colorectal tumors decreased the adverse events. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82: 904-909
• 5 Kim HS, Kim TI, Kim WH. et al. Risk factors for immediate postpolypectomy bleeding of the colon: a multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 1333-1341
• 6 Parikh ND, Zanocco K, Keswani RN. et al. A cost-efficacy decision analysis of prophylactic clip placement after endoscopic removal of large polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 1319-1324
• 7 Gonzalez LM, Moeser AJ, Blikslager AT. Porcine models of digestive disease: the future of large animal translational research. Transl Res J Lab Clin Med 2015; 166: 12-27
• 8 Rieder E, Mesteri I, Bolton J. et al. Endoluminal full-thickness colon-wall resection using an over-the-scope-clip: three techniques compared in a porcine survival study. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A14
• 9 Coron E, Dewitte M, Aubert P. et al. Reversibility of gastric mucosal lesions induced by sodium phosphate tablets and characterized by probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy. Endosc Int Open 2015; 3: E69-E75
• 10 Brégeon J, Coron E, Da Silva ACC. et al. Sacral nerve stimulation enhances early intestinal mucosal repair following mucosal injury in a pig model. J Physiol 2016; 94: 4309-4323
• 11 Bures J, Kopácová M, Kvetina J. et al. Different solutions used for submucosal injection influenced early healing of gastric endoscopic mucosal resection in a preclinical study in experimental pigs. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 2094-2101
• 12 Honda M, Nakamura T, Hori Y. et al. Process of healing of mucosal defects in the esophagus after endoscopic mucosal resection: histological evaluation in a dog model. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 1092-1095
• 13 Shahid MW, Buchner AM, Coron E. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in detecting residual colorectal neoplasia after EMR: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 525-533
• 14 Reinke JM, Sorg H. Wound repair and regeneration. Eur Surg Res 2012; 49: 35-43
• 15 Gonzalez LM, Moeser AJ, Blikslager AT. Porcine models of digestive disease: the future of large animal translational research. Transl Res 2015; 166: 12-27
• 16 Moeser AJ, Ryan KA, Nighot PK. et al. Gastrointestinal dysfunction induced by early weaning is attenuated by delayed weaning and mast cell blockade in pigs. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2007; 293: G413-G421
• 17 Hamer HM, Jonkers D, Venema K. et al. Review article: the role of butyrate on colonic function. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008; 27: 104-119
• 18 Pioche M, Camus M, Rivory J. et al. A self-assembling matrix-forming gel can be easily and safely applied to prevent delayed bleeding after endoscopic resections. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4: E415-E419