Subscribe to RSS
![](/products/assets/desktop/img/oa-logo.png)
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-123467
Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection: a new endoscopic method for resection of rectal neuroendocrine tumor grade 1 (carcinoid) ≤ 10 mm in diameter
Publication History
submitted 17 August 2017
accepted after revision 10 November 2017
Publication Date:
16 January 2018 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00025476/201801/lookinside/thumbnails/1001_10-1055-s-0043-123467-1.jpg)
Abstract
Background and study aims Rectal neuroendocrine tumors grade 1 (NET G1; carcinoid) ≤ 10 mm in diameter often extend into the submucosa, making their complete histological resection difficult using endoscopic techniques. Endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device (ESMR-L) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are commonly used to overcome these difficulties. We also previously reported that underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) could facilitate resection of rectal NET G1. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of UEMR for removing rectal NET G1 ≤ 10 mm in diameter. 6 consecutive patients with rectal NET G1 ≤ 10 mm in diameter underwent UEMR at our hospital. The rate of en bloc resection was 100 %, and the rate of R0 resection was 83 %. The median procedure time was 8 min (range 5 – 12 min). No perforations or delayed bleeding occurred in this study. In conclusion, UEMR allows the safe and reliable resection of rectal NET G1 ≤ 10 mm in diameter with comparable results to ESMR-L or ESD, including high en bloc and R0 resection rates with no increase in significant adverse events. A multicenter trial is required to confirm the validity of the present results.
-
References
- 1 Soga J. Carcinoids of the rectum: an evaluation of 1271 reported cases. Surg Today 1997; 27: 112-119
- 2 Mashimo Y, Matsuda T, Uraoka T. et al. Endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device is an effective and safe treatment for carcinoid tumors in the lower rectum. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 23: 218-221
- 3 Lee DS, Jeon SW, Park SY. et al. The feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal carcinoid tumors: comparison with endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 647-651
- 4 Marui S, Yamashina T, Henmi S. et al. A New Endoscopic Resection Method for Rectal Carcinoid Tumor: Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection. Glob J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 4: 24-25
- 5 Binmoeller KF, Weilert F, Shah J. et al. “Underwater”; EMR without submucosal injection for large sessile colorectal polyps (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 1086-1091
- 6 Uedo N, Nemeth A, Johansson GW. et al. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal lesions. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 172-174
- 7 Kawaguti FS, de Oliveira JF, da Costa Martins B. et al. Underwater endoscopic resection of a neuroendocrine rectal tumor. Endoscopy 2015; 47: E513-E514
- 8 Harada H, Suehiro S, Murakami D. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for small submucosal tumors of the rectum compared with endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 9: 70-76
- 9 Choi CW, Kang DH, Kim HW. et al. Comparison of Endoscopic Resection Therapies for Rectal Carcinoid Tumor: endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection using band ligation. J Clin Gastroenterol 2013; 47: 432-436
- 10 Ponugoti PL, Rex DK. Perforation during underwater EMR. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84: 543-544